Quantcast
ZME Science
  • CoronavirusNEW
  • News
  • Environment
    • Climate
    • Animals
    • Renewable Energy
    • Eco tips
    • Environmental Issues
    • Green Living
  • Health
    • Alternative Medicine
    • Anatomy
    • Diseases
    • Genetics
    • Mind & Brain
    • Nutrition
  • Future
  • Space
  • Feature
    • Feature Post
    • Art
    • Great Pics
    • Design
    • Fossil Friday
    • AstroPicture
    • GeoPicture
    • Did you know?
    • Offbeat
  • More
    • About
    • The Team
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
    • Our stance on climate change
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science

No Result
View All Result
ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
Home Space

Difficult decisions ahead for Mars exploration

Mihai Andrei by Mihai Andrei
March 9, 2011
in Space
ADVERTISEMENT
The report submitted by Steve Squyres will weigh heavily on this project, and not only this one

The joint exploration by NASA and ESA, encompassing joint efforts from the American and European space agency seemed like a dream come true for astronomers from both sides. Especially after the European side designed and started building the Mars Rover, everything appeared to go in the right direction. But the issues NASA is facing at the moment will take their toll on this project too, as with so many others.

A new report from the US National Research Council claims that the esimated budget of $3.5bn for the American part is too high; one billion dollars too high, to be more exact. This leaves the joint initiative facing major problems, as the two sides will have to find a way to solve one side’s problems and work together to achieve the goal they set, with a huge budget gap.

Get more science news like this...

Join the ZME newsletter for amazing science news, features, and exclusive scoops. More than 40,000 subscribers can't be wrong.

   

“We’re quite confident that a really good mission can be done for $2.5bn,” said the survey’s chairman Professor Steve Squyres, “but we leave it to those two agencies to work out exactly the details of what that would look like.

So yeah, we cut one third of all your money, but we’re positive you guys will be able to figure something out – sounds like a good plan to me.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Critically, we feel that the de-scopes have to be shared equitably between Nasa and Esa because it’s so important to preserve the partnership with Esa. We can’t force all the bad news on to Esa; it’s got to be a fair split.”

Things seem to be a bit stuck, and until the two space agencies can find out some sort of brilliant solution to this problem, what wil be done exactly in 2018 remains a matter of debate for everyone. I’m just hoping NASA will rid itself of this kind of issues, because the report I told you about above will be extremely influential.

Tags: esaMarsnasarover
Mihai Andrei

Mihai Andrei

Andrei's background is in geophysics, and he's been fascinated by it ever since he was a child. Feeling that there is a gap between scientists and the general audience, he started ZME Science -- and the results are what you see today.

Follow ZME on social media

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Coronavirus
  • News
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Future
  • Space
  • Feature
  • More

© 2007-2019 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Coronavirus
  • News
  • Environment
    • Climate
    • Animals
    • Renewable Energy
    • Eco tips
    • Environmental Issues
    • Green Living
  • Health
    • Alternative Medicine
    • Anatomy
    • Diseases
    • Genetics
    • Mind & Brain
    • Nutrition
  • Future
  • Space
  • Feature
    • Feature Post
    • Art
    • Great Pics
    • Design
    • Fossil Friday
    • AstroPicture
    • GeoPicture
    • Did you know?
    • Offbeat
  • More
    • About
    • The Team
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
    • Our stance on climate change
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact

© 2007-2019 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.