ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science

Home → Science → News

Time’s ticking out for us on the Doomsday Clock — we’ve got 150 seconds to midnight

The night is dark and full of terror. But we won't be around to see it.

Alexandru MicubyAlexandru Micu
January 26, 2017
in News, Science, World Problems
A A
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterSubmit to Reddit

The Doomsday Clock struck two and a half minutes to annihilation today, the closest it has ever been since 1953 when the US armed up with hydrogen bombs.

Image via Youtube.

Tick-tock

The Doomsday Clock was set up by a group of Manhattan Project researchers who were basically working on world-ending weapons back in 1947. It was a nifty way to keep track of how close humanity threaded to a nuclear Armageddon. Over time, the clock also came to take into account other humanity-busting factors, such as climate change, advances in artificial intelligence, or dangerous pursuits in biotechnology.

Last month, the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists — who is in charge of setting the ‘time’ — suggested that Doomsday was closer than the clock revealed and it was to be reset. Which happened today.

The hand now points 2 and a half minutes to midnight — 30 seconds closer than it has ever been since the height of the Cold War.

Their initial statement listed “tensions between the United States and Russia […] at levels reminiscent of the Cold War, […] climate change, and nuclear proliferation concerns” as the main reasons behind the change. In a statement issued last week, the Bulletin further explained their decision, as well as citing the accomplishments of reality show star US President Donald Trump in setting the time.

“A rise in strident nationalism worldwide, President Donald Trump’s comments on nuclear arms and climate issues, a darkening global security landscape that is colored by increasingly sophisticated technology, and a growing disregard for scientific expertise,” were among these reasons it states.

“The board’s decision to move the clock less than a full minute reflects a simple reality: As this statement is issued, Donald Trump has been the US president only a matter of days.”

Minute changes with huge implications

So just how bad is the current situation? Let’s get some context.

[panel style=”panel-info” title=”The time throughout time.” footer=””]1947 — The clock is set at 7′ to midnight with the advent of nuclear weapons in the USA.

RelatedPosts

“Rogue” National Park Twitter Accounts Emerge After Trump Issues Media Ban
Investors that manage $47 trillion urge companies to commit to net-zero emissions pathway
Climate change is making Europeans vote for Green parties — in some places more than others
Earthquakes could tell how fast the ocean is warming

1949 — As Russia tests its own bomb, the clock ticks 3′ to midnight.

1953 — Russia and the US both detonate nukes within 9 months of one another. 2′ to go gang! This is the closest the clock ever got to 00:00.

1960 — A global sigh of relief is sighed as the US and Russia back down from political hot-spots, start cooperating, and even allow scientific discourse between their researchers. The clock is drawn back to 7′.

1963 — Signing of the Partial Test Ban Treaty, which limits atmospheric nuclear weapon testing. 12′ now.

1968 — China and France test their own nukes. The US commits to the Vietnam War. Both take the clock up to 7′.

1969 — Almost everyone signs the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act, and the clock goes back down to 10′.

1972 — The clock eases back to 12′ after Russia and the US agree to freeze the number of nuclear warheads and ballistic missiles under the SALT I and ABM treaties.

1974 — Tensions rise to 9′ as further disarmament talks (SALT II) grind to a halt, missile development continues, and India tests its first nuclear weapon (the Smiling Buddha).

1980 — The Soviet-Afghan War begins. USA rejects SALT II. 7′.

1981-1984 — Animosity increases between the NATO and Soviet blocks, Ronald Reagan restarts the arms race. The clock ticks 3′ to midnight.

1988-1991 — Things start looking up with further disarmament treaties, the fall of the Iron Curtain, dissolution of the Soviet Union, and the end of the Cold War. It’s now 17′ to midnight and it’s as good as it’s ever gonna get.

1995-2007 — Like a bad hangover after a good time, the clock ups up to 5′. Military spending continues at Cold War levels, nuclear material and know-how disseminates from the former Soviet block and more countries test their own nukes. The US refuses further arms control treaties and announces its intention of restarting ballistic missile development. Climate change is added as a factor for the clock in 2007.

2010 — Not a bad year. One more minute added to the clock brings it to 6′. Presidents Obama and Medvedev ratify further arms reduction treaties, and the first COP takes place in Copenhagen.

2012-2017 — Bad. Repeated failure to address climate change on the part of governments, lousy tracking of the global weapon stockpile, further development of nuclear weapons, growing nuclear waste, and finally the arguments of today’s change, bring us up to 2’30”.[/panel]

So we’re somewhere between official nuclear war and low-key nuclear war. Awesome.

Running out of time

In their 2016 statement, the scientists winding the clock said:

“Three minutes is too close. Far too close. We, the members of the Science and Security Board of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, want to be clear about our decision not to move the hands of the Doomsday Clock in 2016.”

“That decision is not good news, but an expression of dismay that world leaders fail to focus their efforts and the world’s attention on reducing the extreme danger posed by nuclear weapons and climate change.”

“When we call these dangers existential, that is exactly what we mean: They threaten the very existence of civilisation and therefore should be the first order of business for leaders who care about their constituents and their countries.”

This year’s statement took a bird’s eye view of the problems humanity has to tackle, and made one of its most stringent points on the issue of climate change and political-scientific disengagement. The text sadly also betrayed a much darker, and a much more urgent, tone.

“[We are] extremely concerned about the willingness of governments around the world — including the incoming US administration — to ignore or discount sound science and considered expertise during their decision-making processes.”

“It is well past time to move beyond arguments over the reality of climate change and on to solutions, including fiscal measures — such as carbon markets and carbon taxes or fees — that encourage efficiency and put a price on carbon emissions.”

“Wise public officials should act immediately, guiding humanity away from the brink. If they do not, wise citizens must step forward and lead the way.”

So don’t run for the shelter just yet. We’ve still got two and a half minutes left. It’s cutting it awfully close, but we can still try to set things right in that time. So to officials, researchers, industry men and women, anyone out there: let’s put another hand on that clock. Make it 62,5′ to midnight. Then 122,5′.

Let’s add so much time to it, we turn the Doomsday clock into the Doomsday Calendar, then keep plastering so many pages on that baby it becomes a big, beautiful, physical wall of Doomsday Calendar pages we’ll never go through.

I bet that’s a wall Mexico would love to pay for.

Tags: climate changedoomsday clockNucear Weapons

ShareTweetShare
Alexandru Micu

Alexandru Micu

Stunningly charming pun connoisseur, I have been fascinated by the world around me since I first laid eyes on it. Always curious, I'm just having a little fun with some very serious science.

Related Posts

Champiñón Hongos Naturaleza Setas Reino Fungi
Animal facts

What do Fungi, Chameleons, and Humans All Have in Common? We’re all Heterotrophs

byShiella Olimpos
1 week ago
Climate

Climate Change Is Rewriting America’s Gardening Map and Some Plants Can’t Keep Up

byGrace van Deelen
2 weeks ago
Climate

Scientists Create “Bait” to Lure Baby Corals Back to Dying Reefs

byMihai Andrei
4 weeks ago
Science

This Tree Survives Lightning Strikes—and Uses Them to Kill Its Rivals

byTudor Tarita
2 months ago

Recent news

Science Just Debunked the ‘Guns Don’t Kill People’ Argument Again. This Time, It’s Kids

June 13, 2025

It Looks Like a Ruby But This Is Actually the Rarest Kind of Diamond on Earth

June 12, 2025

ChatGPT Got Destroyed in Chess by a 1970s Atari Console. But Should You Be Surprised?

June 12, 2025
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • How we review products
  • Contact

© 2007-2025 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Science News
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Space
  • Future
  • Features
    • Natural Sciences
    • Physics
      • Matter and Energy
      • Quantum Mechanics
      • Thermodynamics
    • Chemistry
      • Periodic Table
      • Applied Chemistry
      • Materials
      • Physical Chemistry
    • Biology
      • Anatomy
      • Biochemistry
      • Ecology
      • Genetics
      • Microbiology
      • Plants and Fungi
    • Geology and Paleontology
      • Planet Earth
      • Earth Dynamics
      • Rocks and Minerals
      • Volcanoes
      • Dinosaurs
      • Fossils
    • Animals
      • Mammals
      • Birds
      • Fish
      • Amphibians
      • Reptiles
      • Invertebrates
      • Pets
      • Conservation
      • Animal facts
    • Climate and Weather
      • Climate change
      • Weather and atmosphere
    • Health
      • Drugs
      • Diseases and Conditions
      • Human Body
      • Mind and Brain
      • Food and Nutrition
      • Wellness
    • History and Humanities
      • Anthropology
      • Archaeology
      • History
      • Economics
      • People
      • Sociology
    • Space & Astronomy
      • The Solar System
      • Sun
      • The Moon
      • Planets
      • Asteroids, meteors & comets
      • Astronomy
      • Astrophysics
      • Cosmology
      • Exoplanets & Alien Life
      • Spaceflight and Exploration
    • Technology
      • Computer Science & IT
      • Engineering
      • Inventions
      • Sustainability
      • Renewable Energy
      • Green Living
    • Culture
    • Resources
  • Videos
  • Reviews
  • About Us
    • About
    • The Team
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
    • Editorial policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact

© 2007-2025 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.