ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science

Home → Science → News

Eradicating poverty requires surprisingly little energy

Pulling billions out of poverty and stabilizing climate change aren't necessarily at odds.

Tibi PuiubyTibi Puiu
November 18, 2019
in News
A A
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterSubmit to Reddit
Credit: MaxPexel.

Many argue that, although we have to address the climate emergency, we also have a responsibility to bring billions of people out of poverty. In order to do that, you need energy, which most often comes from greenhouse gas-emitting fossil fuels. But are the two goals really at odds? A new study suggests that the energy requirements for basic needs are not really that great — in fact, they’re well below the average global energy use per capita.

“People have long worried that economic development and climate mitigation aren’t compatible – that the growth required to bring billions of people out of poverty would make it impossible to reduce net emissions to zero – which is a requirement for climate stabilization. Until now, the research community however had no way to separate out the energy needs for eradicating poverty from countries’ overall demand growth. Without this, vast inequalities and unsustainable consumption patterns in developing countries were being ignored,” explains study lead author Narasimha Rao, a researcher in the IIASA Energy Program.

Rao and colleagues at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) set out to find out whether eradicating poverty truly runs counter to stabilizing climate change. To this end, they studied the material requirements underpinning basic human needs in three developing countries: Brazil, India, and South Africa.

Unlike previous methods, the researchers focused on energy demand from basic services rather than from economic growth. This way, the energy required to lift a population out of poverty is separated from that for affluence.

The results show that eradicating poverty in all three countries surprisingly requires energy that is well below their current national energy use and even well below the average global energy use per capita. The least taxing basic services energy-wise are health and education, while the more energy-intensive requirements are for physical infrastructure, transit, and buildings. Furthermore, the energy requirements for decent living standards can be reduced if a country provides affordable public transit and employs local materials for construction works.

“We didn’t expect that the energy needs for a minimally decent life would be so modest, even for countries like India where large gaps exist. It was also a pleasant surprise that the most essential human needs related to health, nutrition, and education, are cheap in terms of energy. Along the way, we also found that measuring poverty in terms of these material deprivations far exceeds the World Bank’s definition of income poverty,” Rao said in a statement.

This goes to show that it is possible to lift billions of people out of poverty without having to sacrifice climate goals, such as curbing emissions in order to prevent more than 1.5 degrees Celsius of warming, as stated in the Paris Agreement.

However, the findings also come with a stark warning: it is affluence that drives massive energy demand. This is of huge importance as more and more people living in developing countries transition into a middle-class lifestyle. For instance, a 2014 study found that if everyone in the world lived like the average American, we would need 3.9 planets in order to meet the need for resources.

Another important caveat is that each developing country is unique, having difference resource needs to meet the same human development goals. Due to its higher reliance on vehicles, Brazil has a high energy intensity of mobility compared to other countries. Therefore, it will face different costs and challenges to reduce emissions.

RelatedPosts

Time Lapse Video Shows Glacier Retreat
Compound droughts risk destabilizing the global food supply if we keep burning fossil fuels
China’s emissions soar despite remarkable climate action
Greenland is getting darker, increasing fears about global warming and sea level rise

“Eradicating poverty need not stand in the way of stabilizing climate at safe levels. Our study suggests that we need to measure societal progress in terms of these multiple dimensions, not just income, and we should also pay attention to the distribution of growth in developing countries. This can point us to new ways to improve wellbeing while reducing emissions. Policymakers should give particular attention to investing in public transit, green and locally sourced buildings, and encouraging sustainable diets and food systems. These insights can inform current negotiations under the Paris agreement. Countries should take stock and step up the ambition in their pledges,” Rao concludes.

The findings appeared in the journal Nature Energy.

Tags: climate changepoverty

ShareTweetShare
Tibi Puiu

Tibi Puiu

Tibi is a science journalist and co-founder of ZME Science. He writes mainly about emerging tech, physics, climate, and space. In his spare time, Tibi likes to make weird music on his computer and groom felines. He has a B.Sc in mechanical engineering and an M.Sc in renewable energy systems.

Related Posts

Climate

Scientists Create “Bait” to Lure Baby Corals Back to Dying Reefs

byMihai Andrei
1 week ago
Science

This Tree Survives Lightning Strikes—and Uses Them to Kill Its Rivals

byTudor Tarita
1 month ago
Environment

Trump-Appointed EPA Plans to Let Most Polluters Stop Reporting CO2 Emissions

byTibi Puiu
1 month ago
Climate

Japan’s Cherry Blossoms Are Blooming Earlier Than Ever. Guess Why

byMihai Andrei
2 months ago

Recent news

A Hawk in New Jersey Figured Out Traffic Signals and Used Them to Hunt

May 23, 2025

Anthropic’s new AI model (Claude) will scheme and even blackmail to avoid getting shut down

May 23, 2025

Researchers create contact lenses that let you see in the dark, even with your eyes closed

May 23, 2025
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • How we review products
  • Contact

© 2007-2025 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Science News
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Space
  • Future
  • Features
    • Natural Sciences
    • Physics
      • Matter and Energy
      • Quantum Mechanics
      • Thermodynamics
    • Chemistry
      • Periodic Table
      • Applied Chemistry
      • Materials
      • Physical Chemistry
    • Biology
      • Anatomy
      • Biochemistry
      • Ecology
      • Genetics
      • Microbiology
      • Plants and Fungi
    • Geology and Paleontology
      • Planet Earth
      • Earth Dynamics
      • Rocks and Minerals
      • Volcanoes
      • Dinosaurs
      • Fossils
    • Animals
      • Mammals
      • Birds
      • Fish
      • Amphibians
      • Reptiles
      • Invertebrates
      • Pets
      • Conservation
      • Animal facts
    • Climate and Weather
      • Climate change
      • Weather and atmosphere
    • Health
      • Drugs
      • Diseases and Conditions
      • Human Body
      • Mind and Brain
      • Food and Nutrition
      • Wellness
    • History and Humanities
      • Anthropology
      • Archaeology
      • History
      • Economics
      • People
      • Sociology
    • Space & Astronomy
      • The Solar System
      • Sun
      • The Moon
      • Planets
      • Asteroids, meteors & comets
      • Astronomy
      • Astrophysics
      • Cosmology
      • Exoplanets & Alien Life
      • Spaceflight and Exploration
    • Technology
      • Computer Science & IT
      • Engineering
      • Inventions
      • Sustainability
      • Renewable Energy
      • Green Living
    • Culture
    • Resources
  • Videos
  • Reviews
  • About Us
    • About
    • The Team
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
    • Editorial policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact

© 2007-2025 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.