Quantcast
ZME Science
  • News
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Future
  • Space
  • Features
    Menu
    Natural Sciences
    Health
    History & Humanities
    Space & Astronomy
    Technology
    Culture
    Resources
    Natural Sciences

    Physics

    • Matter and Energy
    • Quantum Mechanics
    • Thermodynamics

    Chemistry

    • Periodic Table
    • Applied Chemistry
    • Materials
    • Physical Chemistry

    Biology

    • Anatomy
    • Biochemistry
    • Ecology
    • Genetics
    • Microbiology
    • Plants and Fungi

    Geology and Paleontology

    • Planet Earth
    • Earth Dynamics
    • Rocks and Minerals
    • Volcanoes
    • Dinosaurs
    • Fossils

    Animals

    • Mammals
    • Birds
    • Fish
    • Reptiles
    • Amphibians
    • Invertebrates
    • Pets
    • Conservation
    • Animals Facts

    Climate and Weather

    • Climate Change
    • Weather and Atmosphere

    Geography

    Mathematics

    Health
    • Drugs
    • Diseases and Conditions
    • Human Body
    • Mind and Brain
    • Food and Nutrition
    • Wellness
    History & Humanities
    • Anthropology
    • Archaeology
    • Economics
    • History
    • People
    • Sociology
    Space & Astronomy
    • The Solar System
    • The Sun
    • The Moon
    • Planets
    • Asteroids, Meteors and Comets
    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Cosmology
    • Exoplanets and Alien Life
    • Spaceflight and Exploration
    Technology
    • Computer Science & IT
    • Engineering
    • Inventions
    • Sustainability
    • Renewable Energy
    • Green Living
    Culture
    • Culture and Society
    • Bizarre Stories
    • Lifestyle
    • Art and Music
    • Gaming
    • Books
    • Movies and Shows
    Resources
    • How To
    • Science Careers
    • Metascience
    • Fringe Science
    • Science Experiments
    • School and Study
    • Natural Sciences
    • Health
    • History and Humanities
    • Space & Astronomy
    • Culture
    • Technology
    • Resources
  • Reviews
  • More
    • Agriculture
    • Anthropology
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Electronics
    • Geology
    • History
    • Mathematics
    • Nanotechnology
    • Economics
    • Paleontology
    • Physics
    • Psychology
    • Robotics
  • About Us
    • About
    • The Team
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science

No Result
View All Result
ZME Science

Home → Health

Handwashing with hot water doesn’t kill more germs than cold water. We also need surprisingly little soap

Hot water might be more comfortable but it's wasted energy when it comes to sanitizing your hands.

Tibi Puiu by Tibi Puiu
June 6, 2017
in Health, News

Handwashing with plain soap and water is one of the easiest things and most efficient any person can do to stave off a potentially cumbersome bacterial infection. This alone can slash the presence of bacteria dramatically but can we do anything more? A new study performed by scientists at Rutgers University suggests rinsing with hot water removes just as much bacteria as cold water. Moreover, antibacterial soap wasn’t found to be any more effective at removing bacteria like E. coli than regular soap.

hand washing
Credit: Pixabay.

For the study, 21 healthy volunteers agreed to have their hands sprayed with a lot of bacteria for six months. The bacterial species were harmless. Over the span of these six months, scientists counted the bacterial samples after each participant washed their hands using 60-degree, 79-degree or 100-degree water (15-degree C to 38-degree C) and 0.5 ml, 1 ml or 2 ml of soap. The findings suggest the water’s temperature makes no difference as far as removing bacteria is concerned.

“People need to feel comfortable when they are washing their hands but as far as effectiveness, this study shows us that the temperature of the water used didn’t matter,” said Donald Schaffner, distinguished professor and extension specialist in food science.

Another surprising finding was that the amount of soap used seems to make no difference when removing bacteria. Researchers say more work is needed to understand exactly how much and what type of soap is needed to remove harmful microbes from hands. After all, ‘some soap’ definitely makes a difference. Even so, this investigation tells us that we need very little soap to expel potentially harmful bacteria. You don’t need to cover everything in lather to gain benefits. And like other studies before it, the Rutgers team found antibacterial soap consisting of 1% disinfectant chloroxylenol was no more effective than regular ol’ soap. In light of this, using antibacterial soap is actually a very idea because it promotes antibiotic resistance.

Hot water might be more comfortable but it’s wasted energy when it comes to sanitizing your hands

The fact that water temperature doesn’t matter, though, is by far the most important finding from this study. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issues guidelines, every four years, to states recommending plumbing systems at food establishments and restaurants deliver water at 100 degrees Fahrenheit for handwashing. In many places, this recommendation is seen as a requirement.

“I think this study indicates that there should be a policy change,” said Schaffner. “Instead of having a temperature requirement, the policy should only say that comfortable or warm water needs to be delivered. We are wasting energy to heat water to a level that is not necessary.”

Moving on, the researchers had more very useful findings to share. One of them was that handwashing for even 10 mere seconds was enough to remove bacteria. The Centers for Disease Control recommends washing your hands for at least 20 seconds, though. If counting to 20 sounds like a drag, you can always hum the ‘Happy Birthday’ song twice. That should do the trick. Also, the CDC insists people don’t forget to lather and scrub the backs of the hands, between the fingers and, most importantly, underneath the nails where microbes are especially prevalent. Washing your hands seems trivial to most people — after all, it’s one of the first hygienic habit parents teach us. A previous study from Michigan State University, however, found only 5 percent of people actually do it right. 

Dane A. Jensen, David R. Macinga, David J. Shumaker, Roberto Bellino, James W. Arbogast, Donald W. Schaffner. Quantifying the Effects of Water Temperature, Soap Volume, Lather Time, and Antimicrobial Soap as Variables in the Removal of Escherichia coli ATCC 11229 from Hands. Journal of Food Protection, 2017; 80 (6): 1022 DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-370.

 

 

Was this helpful?


Thanks for your feedback!

Related posts:
  1. Antibacterial soap is no better at killing germs than regular soap
  2. New technology could kill 99.9% of the deadly germs in the air
  3. How to make soap at home — the science and art behind soap making
  4. Solid soap vs liquid soap: which is more eco friendly?
  5. Why does hot water freezes faster than cold water? Enter the Mpemba effect
Tags: bacteriahandwashing

ADVERTISEMENT
  • News
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Future
  • Space
  • Features
  • Reviews
  • More
  • About Us

© 2007-2021 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Future
  • Space
  • Features
    • Natural Sciences
    • Health
    • History and Humanities
    • Space & Astronomy
    • Culture
    • Technology
    • Resources
  • Reviews
  • More
    • Agriculture
    • Anthropology
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Electronics
    • Geology
    • History
    • Mathematics
    • Nanotechnology
    • Economics
    • Paleontology
    • Physics
    • Psychology
    • Robotics
  • About Us
    • About
    • The Team
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact

© 2007-2021 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.

Don’t you want to get smarter every day?

YES, sign me up!

Over 35,000 subscribers can’t be wrong. Don’t worry, we never spam. By signing up you agree to our privacy policy.

✕
ZME Science News

FREE
VIEW