ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science

Home → Health

Handwashing with hot water doesn’t kill more germs than cold water. We also need surprisingly little soap

Hot water might be more comfortable but it's wasted energy when it comes to sanitizing your hands.

Tibi PuiubyTibi Puiu
June 6, 2017
in Health, News
A A
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterSubmit to Reddit

Handwashing with plain soap and water is one of the easiest things and most efficient any person can do to stave off a potentially cumbersome bacterial infection. This alone can slash the presence of bacteria dramatically but can we do anything more? A new study performed by scientists at Rutgers University suggests rinsing with hot water removes just as much bacteria as cold water. Moreover, antibacterial soap wasn’t found to be any more effective at removing bacteria like E. coli than regular soap.

hand washing
Credit: Pixabay.

For the study, 21 healthy volunteers agreed to have their hands sprayed with a lot of bacteria for six months. The bacterial species were harmless. Over the span of these six months, scientists counted the bacterial samples after each participant washed their hands using 60-degree, 79-degree or 100-degree water (15-degree C to 38-degree C) and 0.5 ml, 1 ml or 2 ml of soap. The findings suggest the water’s temperature makes no difference as far as removing bacteria is concerned.

“People need to feel comfortable when they are washing their hands but as far as effectiveness, this study shows us that the temperature of the water used didn’t matter,” said Donald Schaffner, distinguished professor and extension specialist in food science.

Another surprising finding was that the amount of soap used seems to make no difference when removing bacteria. Researchers say more work is needed to understand exactly how much and what type of soap is needed to remove harmful microbes from hands. After all, ‘some soap’ definitely makes a difference. Even so, this investigation tells us that we need very little soap to expel potentially harmful bacteria. You don’t need to cover everything in lather to gain benefits. And like other studies before it, the Rutgers team found antibacterial soap consisting of 1% disinfectant chloroxylenol was no more effective than regular ol’ soap. In light of this, using antibacterial soap is actually a very idea because it promotes antibiotic resistance.

Hot water might be more comfortable but it’s wasted energy when it comes to sanitizing your hands

The fact that water temperature doesn’t matter, though, is by far the most important finding from this study. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issues guidelines, every four years, to states recommending plumbing systems at food establishments and restaurants deliver water at 100 degrees Fahrenheit for handwashing. In many places, this recommendation is seen as a requirement.

“I think this study indicates that there should be a policy change,” said Schaffner. “Instead of having a temperature requirement, the policy should only say that comfortable or warm water needs to be delivered. We are wasting energy to heat water to a level that is not necessary.”

Moving on, the researchers had more very useful findings to share. One of them was that handwashing for even 10 mere seconds was enough to remove bacteria. The Centers for Disease Control recommends washing your hands for at least 20 seconds, though. If counting to 20 sounds like a drag, you can always hum the ‘Happy Birthday’ song twice. That should do the trick. Also, the CDC insists people don’t forget to lather and scrub the backs of the hands, between the fingers and, most importantly, underneath the nails where microbes are especially prevalent. Washing your hands seems trivial to most people — after all, it’s one of the first hygienic habit parents teach us. A previous study from Michigan State University, however, found only 5 percent of people actually do it right. 

Dane A. Jensen, David R. Macinga, David J. Shumaker, Roberto Bellino, James W. Arbogast, Donald W. Schaffner. Quantifying the Effects of Water Temperature, Soap Volume, Lather Time, and Antimicrobial Soap as Variables in the Removal of Escherichia coli ATCC 11229 from Hands. Journal of Food Protection, 2017; 80 (6): 1022 DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-370.

RelatedPosts

Amazing art made out of living cells
Oral sex might be helping the spread of unstoppable bacteria
Scientists film bacteria becoming virtually drug-immune — and it took them only 10 days
NYC mice are crawling with antibiotic-resistant bacteria and viruses

 

 

Tags: bacteriahandwashing

ShareTweetShare
Tibi Puiu

Tibi Puiu

Tibi is a science journalist and co-founder of ZME Science. He writes mainly about emerging tech, physics, climate, and space. In his spare time, Tibi likes to make weird music on his computer and groom felines. He has a B.Sc in mechanical engineering and an M.Sc in renewable energy systems.

Related Posts

Biology

These Bacteria Exhale Electricity and Could Help Fight Climate Change

byTudor Tarita
1 week ago
Biology

China’s Tiangong space station has some bacteria that are unknown to science

byMihai Andrei
4 weeks ago
Biology

The secret to making plant-based milk tastier and healthier: bacteria

byAlexandra Gerea
2 months ago
Biology

Can Bacteria Solve Crimes? The “Sexome” Could Help Catch Sexual Predators

byMihai Andrei
4 months ago

Recent news

This Plastic Dissolves in Seawater and Leaves Behind Zero Microplastics

June 14, 2025

Women Rate Women’s Looks Higher Than Even Men

June 14, 2025

AI-Based Method Restores Priceless Renaissance Art in Under 4 Hours Rather Than Months

June 13, 2025
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • How we review products
  • Contact

© 2007-2025 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Science News
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Space
  • Future
  • Features
    • Natural Sciences
    • Physics
      • Matter and Energy
      • Quantum Mechanics
      • Thermodynamics
    • Chemistry
      • Periodic Table
      • Applied Chemistry
      • Materials
      • Physical Chemistry
    • Biology
      • Anatomy
      • Biochemistry
      • Ecology
      • Genetics
      • Microbiology
      • Plants and Fungi
    • Geology and Paleontology
      • Planet Earth
      • Earth Dynamics
      • Rocks and Minerals
      • Volcanoes
      • Dinosaurs
      • Fossils
    • Animals
      • Mammals
      • Birds
      • Fish
      • Amphibians
      • Reptiles
      • Invertebrates
      • Pets
      • Conservation
      • Animal facts
    • Climate and Weather
      • Climate change
      • Weather and atmosphere
    • Health
      • Drugs
      • Diseases and Conditions
      • Human Body
      • Mind and Brain
      • Food and Nutrition
      • Wellness
    • History and Humanities
      • Anthropology
      • Archaeology
      • History
      • Economics
      • People
      • Sociology
    • Space & Astronomy
      • The Solar System
      • Sun
      • The Moon
      • Planets
      • Asteroids, meteors & comets
      • Astronomy
      • Astrophysics
      • Cosmology
      • Exoplanets & Alien Life
      • Spaceflight and Exploration
    • Technology
      • Computer Science & IT
      • Engineering
      • Inventions
      • Sustainability
      • Renewable Energy
      • Green Living
    • Culture
    • Resources
  • Videos
  • Reviews
  • About Us
    • About
    • The Team
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
    • Editorial policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact

© 2007-2025 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.