ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science

Home → Science → News

California could go 100% renewable by 2050, Stanford study says

Mihai AndreibyMihai Andrei
August 12, 2014
in News, Renewable Energy
A A
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterSubmit to Reddit

RelatedPosts

Seals and bacteria are leaching mercury even in unpolluted waters
Germany cuts solar energy feed-in tariff by 50% in 8 years
No Sun? No Problem! Scientists Grow Plants Using Electricity Instead
Petroleum expert: Our Current Oil Use is “Suicidal Within 1 Generation” – eye opening video
Solar energy could play the most important role in Californian energy. Image via The Leaf Exchange.

A new study conducted by Stanford Researchers demonstrates a practical “roadmap” for converting California’s all-purpose energy infrastructure over to renewable sources by 2050. The paper proposes running the state on a mixture of wind, water and sunlight (WWS).

To make things even more interesting, the paper does it all with available technologies – of course, it is extremely likely that as years pass, renewable energy technology will become cheaper and more effective, which makes this paper even more admirable – California could go 100% renewable with today’s technology! The paper also takes into consideration population growth and other likely social trends.

Lead author Mark Z Jacobson, has previously outlined similar proposals on a global level; he explained how most (or, with a lot of effort, all) of civilization could switch to renewables in two decades. Now, on this analysis on California, he provides an explanation in much more detail, almost like a step-by-step how-to guide. In his vision, he rules out fossil fuels, nuclear energy, and biofuels – which are increasingly considered as a not-really renewable source of energy.

In the end, he concludes that the best solution would be a melange of renewables – solar would be the key for sunny California, providing 55 percent of the state’s energy. Wind would be the other major energy source, at 35 percent. Together, they would provide 90 percent of the state’s energy requirement, the rest being contributed by geothermal (5 percent), hidro (4 percent), and tidal energy (1 percent).

He also explains that in the long term, this would create 220.000 more jobs than in fossil fuels. eliminate between 3,800 and 23,200 premature deaths a year attributable to air pollution, and avoid the associated health system costs to the tune of between $31 billion to $232 billion per annum. Taking into consideration all these factors, the initial investment would be quickly recovered.

 “The California air-pollution health plus global climate cost benefits from eliminating California emissions could equal the $1.1 trillion installation cost of 603 GW of new power needed for a 100% all-purpose WWS system within ~7 (4–14) years.”

Scientific Reference: A roadmap for repowering California for all purposes with wind, water, and sunlight.

Tags: Californiageothermal energyrenewable energysolar energywind energy

ShareTweetShare
Mihai Andrei

Mihai Andrei

Dr. Andrei Mihai is a geophysicist and founder of ZME Science. He has a Ph.D. in geophysics and archaeology and has completed courses from prestigious universities (with programs ranging from climate and astronomy to chemistry and geology). He is passionate about making research more accessible to everyone and communicating news and features to a broad audience.

Related Posts

Future

Sinking Giant Concrete Orbs to the Bottom of the Ocean Could Store Massive Amounts of Renewable Energy

byTibi Puiu
1 week ago
Agriculture

America’s Cornfields Could Power the Future—With Solar Panels, Not Ethanol

byTudor Tarita
1 month ago
Climate

This Solar-Powered Device Sucks CO2 From the Air—and Turns It Into Fuel

byTibi Puiu
2 months ago
News

For the first time ever, wind and solar produced more electricity than coal in the US

byTudor Tarita
3 months ago

Recent news

Science Just Debunked the ‘Guns Don’t Kill People’ Argument Again. This Time, It’s Kids

June 13, 2025

It Looks Like a Ruby But This Is Actually the Rarest Kind of Diamond on Earth

June 12, 2025

ChatGPT Got Destroyed in Chess by a 1970s Atari Console. But Should You Be Surprised?

June 12, 2025
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • How we review products
  • Contact

© 2007-2025 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Science News
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Space
  • Future
  • Features
    • Natural Sciences
    • Physics
      • Matter and Energy
      • Quantum Mechanics
      • Thermodynamics
    • Chemistry
      • Periodic Table
      • Applied Chemistry
      • Materials
      • Physical Chemistry
    • Biology
      • Anatomy
      • Biochemistry
      • Ecology
      • Genetics
      • Microbiology
      • Plants and Fungi
    • Geology and Paleontology
      • Planet Earth
      • Earth Dynamics
      • Rocks and Minerals
      • Volcanoes
      • Dinosaurs
      • Fossils
    • Animals
      • Mammals
      • Birds
      • Fish
      • Amphibians
      • Reptiles
      • Invertebrates
      • Pets
      • Conservation
      • Animal facts
    • Climate and Weather
      • Climate change
      • Weather and atmosphere
    • Health
      • Drugs
      • Diseases and Conditions
      • Human Body
      • Mind and Brain
      • Food and Nutrition
      • Wellness
    • History and Humanities
      • Anthropology
      • Archaeology
      • History
      • Economics
      • People
      • Sociology
    • Space & Astronomy
      • The Solar System
      • Sun
      • The Moon
      • Planets
      • Asteroids, meteors & comets
      • Astronomy
      • Astrophysics
      • Cosmology
      • Exoplanets & Alien Life
      • Spaceflight and Exploration
    • Technology
      • Computer Science & IT
      • Engineering
      • Inventions
      • Sustainability
      • Renewable Energy
      • Green Living
    • Culture
    • Resources
  • Videos
  • Reviews
  • About Us
    • About
    • The Team
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
    • Editorial policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact

© 2007-2025 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.