ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science

Home → Science → Geology

The giant, prehistoric squid that wasn’t

Mihai AndreibyMihai Andrei
October 11, 2011
in Geology
A A
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterSubmit to Reddit

RelatedPosts

Jurassic Predator found in Scotland – It Munched on Sharks and Dinosaurs
Bus sized Triassic marine monster sheds light on ecosystems
Fossil pigments show the true colors of ancient sea monsters
What is the Loch Ness monster: myth or kernel of truth?

A day or two ago, a whole lot of science websites (including ourselves, let’s be fair), wrote about the big Triassic ‘kraken’; basically, everyone was talking about a super intelligent predatory squid which fed on ichtyosaurs. Funny enough, but when I asked the paleontologists working at my University, they all smiled ironically. Why, you may ask? Well, because there’s not one shred of evidence to back that up.

Now, of course it is unfortunate that the press was all over this story and promoting it like crazy, despite the lack of scientific backup, but when science sites make mistakes such as this one – this just can’t be pardoned. If you have no idea what the original story, here’s the main idea:

There were a lot of ichtyosaur bones found in central Nevada, in what is now called the Berlin-Ichtyosaur State Park. Now, why these 15 meter long reptiles (Shonisaurus popularis) were found in such larg numbers is not known, so paleontologists have come up with several theories, such as poisoning or strange tides, etc. Mark McMenamin and wife Dianna Schulte-McMenamin of Mount Holyoke College have come up with their own theory: that it was an old cemetery, where a squid like none has ever been seen used to eat and throw its meals. Now, nothing wrong with that mind you – it’s as good a theory as any, but THERE IS NO CLEAR EVIDENCE TO BACK IT UP. You see, unlike politics, that’s how things work in science: when somebody SAYS something, that doesn’t really matter; when somebody BACKS IT UP with clear evidence – that’s when people start listening.

At the moment, there’s no fossil indication of what they call ‘the kraken’. No fossil, no preserved body parts, no hooks, nothing! The whole theory (I insist, theory) is based on the fact that there are a lot of ichtyosaurs in the area; and if a giant ichtyosaur eating kraken wasn’t enough, guess what – it even played with its food. An extraordinary claim like this requires extraordinary evidence, and there is none. Sorry if I’m repeating myself, but hopefully this will make it clear. Hey, and you don’t have to be a paleontologist to realize this.

Tags: ichtyosaurkraken

ShareTweetShare
Mihai Andrei

Mihai Andrei

Dr. Andrei Mihai is a geophysicist and founder of ZME Science. He has a Ph.D. in geophysics and archaeology and has completed courses from prestigious universities (with programs ranging from climate and astronomy to chemistry and geology). He is passionate about making research more accessible to everyone and communicating news and features to a broad audience.

Related Posts

Culture & Society

What is the Loch Ness monster: myth or kernel of truth?

byTibi Puiu
4 years ago
An artist's impression of the ichthyosaur recently unearthed in Scotland Photo: Todd Marshall/PA
Biology

Jurassic Predator found in Scotland – It Munched on Sharks and Dinosaurs

byDragos Mitrica
10 years ago
Representation of an Ichtyosaur.
Biology

Fossil pigments show the true colors of ancient sea monsters

byMihai Andrei
11 years ago
Biology

Bus sized Triassic marine monster sheds light on ecosystems

byMihai Andrei
12 years ago

Recent news

This Plastic Dissolves in Seawater and Leaves Behind Zero Microplastics

June 14, 2025

Women Rate Women’s Looks Higher Than Even Men

June 14, 2025

AI-Based Method Restores Priceless Renaissance Art in Under 4 Hours Rather Than Months

June 13, 2025
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • How we review products
  • Contact

© 2007-2025 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Science News
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Space
  • Future
  • Features
    • Natural Sciences
    • Physics
      • Matter and Energy
      • Quantum Mechanics
      • Thermodynamics
    • Chemistry
      • Periodic Table
      • Applied Chemistry
      • Materials
      • Physical Chemistry
    • Biology
      • Anatomy
      • Biochemistry
      • Ecology
      • Genetics
      • Microbiology
      • Plants and Fungi
    • Geology and Paleontology
      • Planet Earth
      • Earth Dynamics
      • Rocks and Minerals
      • Volcanoes
      • Dinosaurs
      • Fossils
    • Animals
      • Mammals
      • Birds
      • Fish
      • Amphibians
      • Reptiles
      • Invertebrates
      • Pets
      • Conservation
      • Animal facts
    • Climate and Weather
      • Climate change
      • Weather and atmosphere
    • Health
      • Drugs
      • Diseases and Conditions
      • Human Body
      • Mind and Brain
      • Food and Nutrition
      • Wellness
    • History and Humanities
      • Anthropology
      • Archaeology
      • History
      • Economics
      • People
      • Sociology
    • Space & Astronomy
      • The Solar System
      • Sun
      • The Moon
      • Planets
      • Asteroids, meteors & comets
      • Astronomy
      • Astrophysics
      • Cosmology
      • Exoplanets & Alien Life
      • Spaceflight and Exploration
    • Technology
      • Computer Science & IT
      • Engineering
      • Inventions
      • Sustainability
      • Renewable Energy
      • Green Living
    • Culture
    • Resources
  • Videos
  • Reviews
  • About Us
    • About
    • The Team
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
    • Editorial policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact

© 2007-2025 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.