Innovative tech generates electricity from where rivers meet the ocean

Researchers at Penn State University used a hybrid technology to produce electrical power at the transition zone from seawater to freshwater on coasts. It relies on the difference in saline concentration between the two water mediums to generate power. The team estimates the locked energy potential in such a medium is enough to meet 40% of the world’s electricity demand.

The method could supply 40% of the world’s electricity needs. Credit: Pixabay.

Making electricity from varying saline concentrations in water or a saline gradient isn’t exactly a new idea. In 1973, Prof. Sidney Loeb from Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel, invented such a power generation method called pressure retarded osmosis (PRO). This technique selectively allows water to pass through a semi-permeable membrane littered with tiny holes but blocks salt. The resulting osmotic pressure is what generates power by driving a turbine.

Since Loeb introduced PRO, it has become the most common and best technology for generating energy from a saline energy gradient. The process can be run in reverse to desalinate saltwater too.

The problem with PRO, however, is that in time the transport membrane becomes unusable after bacteria congregate as biofilms on its surface or particles get stuck in the holes. Moreover, PRO isn’t very good when the water is super-salty.

Then there’s reverse electrodialysis (RED), which was invented by the same Prof. Loeb in 1977. RED uses an electrochemical gradient instead of a difference in the electric field to develop voltages across ion-exchange membranes. These membranes only allow either positively charged or negatively charged ions to pass through them. Essentially, the difference in ion concentration between either chloride or sodium ions is what drives power generation. Unlike PRO, the ion-exchange membranes in RED do not require water to flow through them so there’s no fouling risk. The downside is that RED isn’t capable of generating large amounts of power.

Finally, there’s a third method called capacitive mixing (CapMix). Relatively recently develop, CapMix involves capturing energy from the voltage that naturally unfolds when two identical electrodes are sequentially exposed to two different kinds of water of varying salinity — freshwater vs saltwater, for instance. Just like RED, CapMix doesn’t generate impressive amounts of voltage.

Two in one

Looking to revamp saline gradient energy power generation, a team at Penn State combined RED and CapMix to create a hybrid tech that generates unprecedented power in an electrochemical flow cell.

Inside the flow cell, there are two channels separated by an anion-exchange membrane. Inside each of the two channels, the researchers placed a copper hexacyanoferrate electrode with a graphite foil acting as a current collector. The cell is completely sealed by two end plates with nuts and bolts.

One of the channels is fed with synthetic seawater while the other is fed with synthetic freshwater. Periodically switching the water’s flow paths allowed the cell to recharge and further produce power.

“By combining the two methods, they end up giving you a lot more energy,” said Christopher Gorski, assistant professor in environmental engineering at Penn State.
“There are two things going on here that make it work,” said Gorski. “The first is you have the salt going to the electrodes. The second is you have the chloride transferring across the membrane. Since both of these processes generate a voltage, you end up developing a combined voltage at the electrodes and across the membrane.”

During experiments, the team varied the type of membrane used as well as the salinity difference and recorded the open-circuit cell voltages while two solutions were fed at a rate of 15 milliliters per minute. This is how they learned that:

stacking multiple cells influences electricity generation;
the method generates unprecedently high peak power densities of 12.6 watts/m^2 compared to 2.9 watts/m^2 for RED and 9.2 watts/m^2 for PRO. That’s 36% more power density than PRO and all without fouling problems.

“What we’ve shown is that we can bring that power density up to what people have reported for pressure retarded osmosis and to a value much higher than what has been reported if you use these two processes alone,” Gorski said.

In a time where solar and wind are growing rapidly to the point they’re becoming recognized as ‘mainstream’ as opposed to ‘alternative’, it’s refreshing to hear about other, novel means of generating renewable energy. In the face of climate change and growing demand for energy, there is never one solution to our problems but a mix.