ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science

Home → Science → News

Cancer in demise: mortality rate plummets by 19.5% since 1991

Tibi PuiubyTibi Puiu
September 30, 2014
in Health, News
A A
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterSubmit to Reddit

RelatedPosts

Tall people are more likely to get cancer
Pap tests could one day tell women if they have breast or ovarian cancer
Bacterial defenders discovered inside cancer cells, breaking down chemo drugs
Microsoft sniffs for cancer clues in your search queries

Some people tend to believe that today’s society is excessively being eaten up by cancer, which is true to a certain degree. A lot more people are dying of cancer today than 100 years ago, but not because of GMO foods or chemtrails. The main reason people are dying of cancer is old age. In 1900, the average American lifespan was 46.3 years for males and 48.3 years for females, yet by 2010 life expectancy was 76.2 years for men and 81.1 years for women. During the same time frame, cancer has moved from the #8 position on the main cause of death list to #2, hence the confusion that some people experience. We have technology and medicine to thank for blacklisting pneumonia/influenza, tuberculosis, and gastrointestinal infections which were the top 3 leading causes of death in 1900, but how are we fairing in the war against cancer?

cancer_survivor
Simon James, UK: “In 2006 I was diagnosed with bowel cancer and underwent a series of operations followed by radiotherapy. This picture shows me with my original CT scan three years after my treatment. It’s now six years since the original diagnosis and I’m still cancer-free!” Photo: BBC

Here on ZME Science, we’ve written hundreds of articles about the most recent developments and treatments in cancer research. Still a ravaging disease that killed 8.2 million people worldwide in 2012, cancer as it stands now seems to be on the retreat.  Nearly 14.5 million Americans with a history of cancer were alive on January 1, 2014. Of these, 64% were diagnosed 5 or more years ago, and 15% were diagnosed 20 or more years ago. Almost half (45%) of cancer survivors are 70 years of age or older, while only 5% are younger than 40 years. Clearly, these stats show that we’re slowly winning against cancer.

These two graphs, however, may be the most revealing bits to highlight this idea. Published in a paper in the journal CA: Cancer Journal for Clinicians, the graphs show how early detection, preventative measures, improved treatment and other measures have helped reduce cancer mortality rate  a peak of 215 deaths per 100,000 people in 1991 to 172 deaths per 100,000 people in 2010. The red line shows how many people should have died by today if the trendline up to 1991 was to remain intact. Instead, we see the cancer mortality rate has steadily fallen, and will likely stabilize unless there’s a huge breakthrough.

Graph:  "Cancer Statistics, 2014." CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
Graph: “Cancer Statistics, 2014.” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians

Indeed, survival rates are still horrifyingly low but the gist is that we’re going somewhere and all of these painstaking efforts to fight cancer are paying off. Who knows what 100 years from now might look like.

 

Tags: cancer

ShareTweetShare
Tibi Puiu

Tibi Puiu

Tibi is a science journalist and co-founder of ZME Science. He writes mainly about emerging tech, physics, climate, and space. In his spare time, Tibi likes to make weird music on his computer and groom felines. He has a B.Sc in mechanical engineering and an M.Sc in renewable energy systems.

Related Posts

Health

AI Can Hear Cancer in the Voice Before Doctors Can Detect It

byMihai Andrei
5 days ago
Health

Sugar Compound from Deep-Sea Bacteria Causes Cancer Cells to Self-Destruct

byMihai Andrei
5 days ago
Health

A Popular Artificial Sweetener Could Be Making Cancer Treatments Less Effective

byTudor Tarita
2 weeks ago
Future

This Disturbing Phone Case Gets Sunburned Like Real Skin to Teach You a Lesson

byTibi Puiu
3 weeks ago

Recent news

The UK Government Says You Should Delete Emails to Save Water. That’s Dumb — and Hypocritical

August 16, 2025

In Denmark, a Vaccine Is Eliminating a Type of Cervical Cancer

August 16, 2025
This Picture of the Week shows a stunning spiral galaxy known as NGC 4945. This little corner of space, near the constellation of Centaurus and over 12 million light-years away, may seem peaceful at first — but NGC 4945 is locked in a violent struggle. At the very centre of nearly every galaxy is a supermassive black hole. Some, like the one at the centre of our own Milky Way, aren’t particularly hungry. But NGC 4945’s supermassive black hole is ravenous, consuming huge amounts of matter — and the MUSE instrument at ESO’s Very Large Telescope (VLT) has caught it playing with its food. This messy eater, contrary to a black hole’s typical all-consuming reputation, is blowing out powerful winds of material. This cone-shaped wind is shown in red in the inset, overlaid on a wider image captured with the MPG/ESO telescope at La Silla. In fact, this wind is moving so fast that it will end up escaping the galaxy altogether, lost to the void of intergalactic space. This is part of a new study that measured how winds move in several nearby galaxies. The MUSE observations show that these incredibly fast winds demonstrate a strange behaviour: they actually speed up far away from the central black hole, accelerating even more on their journey to the galactic outskirts. This process ejects potential star-forming material from a galaxy, suggesting that black holes control the fates of their host galaxies by dampening the stellar birth rate. It also shows that the more powerful black holes impede their own growth by removing the gas and dust they feed on, driving the whole system closer towards a sort of galactic equilibrium. Now, with these new results, we are one step closer to understanding the acceleration mechanism of the winds responsible for shaping the evolution of galaxies, and the history of the universe. Links  Research paper in Nature Astronomy by Marconcini et al. Close-up view of NGC 4945’s nucleus

Astronomers Find ‘Punctum,’ a Bizarre Space Object That Might be Unlike Anything in the Universe

August 15, 2025
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • How we review products
  • Contact

© 2007-2025 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Science News
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Space
  • Future
  • Features
    • Natural Sciences
    • Physics
      • Matter and Energy
      • Quantum Mechanics
      • Thermodynamics
    • Chemistry
      • Periodic Table
      • Applied Chemistry
      • Materials
      • Physical Chemistry
    • Biology
      • Anatomy
      • Biochemistry
      • Ecology
      • Genetics
      • Microbiology
      • Plants and Fungi
    • Geology and Paleontology
      • Planet Earth
      • Earth Dynamics
      • Rocks and Minerals
      • Volcanoes
      • Dinosaurs
      • Fossils
    • Animals
      • Mammals
      • Birds
      • Fish
      • Amphibians
      • Reptiles
      • Invertebrates
      • Pets
      • Conservation
      • Animal facts
    • Climate and Weather
      • Climate change
      • Weather and atmosphere
    • Health
      • Drugs
      • Diseases and Conditions
      • Human Body
      • Mind and Brain
      • Food and Nutrition
      • Wellness
    • History and Humanities
      • Anthropology
      • Archaeology
      • History
      • Economics
      • People
      • Sociology
    • Space & Astronomy
      • The Solar System
      • Sun
      • The Moon
      • Planets
      • Asteroids, meteors & comets
      • Astronomy
      • Astrophysics
      • Cosmology
      • Exoplanets & Alien Life
      • Spaceflight and Exploration
    • Technology
      • Computer Science & IT
      • Engineering
      • Inventions
      • Sustainability
      • Renewable Energy
      • Green Living
    • Culture
    • Resources
  • Videos
  • Reviews
  • About Us
    • About
    • The Team
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
    • Editorial policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact

© 2007-2025 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.