ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science

Home → Science → Physics

Is it better to run or walk in the rain to stay as dry as possible? A lifelong physics question

Tibi PuiubyTibi Puiu
July 24, 2012 - Updated on July 24, 2019
in Physics, Studies
A A
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterSubmit to Reddit

RelatedPosts

Researchers create fuel from water, CO2, and artificial photosynthesis
Climate change might be brewing a megadrought in the western US
More than a third of all planets bigger than Earth may be ‘water worlds’
Why does it rain so much in London? Well, it’s not that much really

rain walk or run You just got out of the office, looking to head home to a soothing dinner, only to find that it’s raining cats and dogs outside – and you forgot your umbrella of course. Do you walk or run to your car to stay as dry as possible? It might sound trivial, but this is a question that has gained a considerable amount of attention from physicists, and other scientists alike. Various suggestions have been made, the most recent of which comes from Franco Bocci of University of Brescia‘s Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering. Bocci used mathematics to describe the problem, and found that running is usually best during most situations, however concludes that there’s an optimal pace for particular conditions.

If you run in the rain, you get exposed to rain for a smaller interval of time than walking, however you also maximize the body surface that directly comes into contact with the rain droplets. Bocci take on the issue comes with a twist as he used simplified geometrical bodies, when previous attempts assumed people to be thin sheets or upright, rectangular boxes.

From his paper, which you can read here in its entirety, complete with equations and thorough statements, the author derived these conclusions:

  • “For rain falling vertically, the best strategy is to run as quickly as possible. The same is also true for motion into the wind.”
  • “For motion downwind, there may be an optimal speed, which equals the component along the direction of motion of the wind velocity. This happens only if the ratio between the cross-section of the body perpendicular to the motion and the horizontal one is large enough; otherwise, the best choice is again to run at the maximum speed one can reach.”

In short, the answer depends on the shape and orientation of the moving bod, as well as  the wind direction and intensity. You can say that in the majority of cases, when rain is joined by little to no wind, it is better to run if your intentions are of staying as dry as possible.

Bocci’s paper was published in the journal European Journal of Physics.

[Image credit / story source]

Tags: rainwater

ShareTweetShare
Tibi Puiu

Tibi Puiu

Tibi is a science journalist and co-founder of ZME Science. He writes mainly about emerging tech, physics, climate, and space. In his spare time, Tibi likes to make weird music on his computer and groom felines. He has a B.Sc in mechanical engineering and an M.Sc in renewable energy systems.

Related Posts

Mars waterbeds
News

Scientists Discover 9,000 Miles of Ancient Riverbeds on Mars. The Red Planet May Have Been Wet for Millions of Years

byJordan Strickler
1 month ago
News

Scientists Ranked the Most Hydrating Drinks and Water Didn’t Win

byTibi Puiu
1 month ago
Environment

New Global River Map Is the First to Include River Bifurcations and Canals

byRebecca Owen
3 months ago
Environment

Mexico Will Give U.S. More Water to Avert More Tariffs

byKimberly M. S. Cartier
4 months ago

Recent news

The UK Government Says You Should Delete Emails to Save Water. That’s Dumb — and Hypocritical

August 16, 2025

In Denmark, a Vaccine Is Eliminating a Type of Cervical Cancer

August 16, 2025
This Picture of the Week shows a stunning spiral galaxy known as NGC 4945. This little corner of space, near the constellation of Centaurus and over 12 million light-years away, may seem peaceful at first — but NGC 4945 is locked in a violent struggle. At the very centre of nearly every galaxy is a supermassive black hole. Some, like the one at the centre of our own Milky Way, aren’t particularly hungry. But NGC 4945’s supermassive black hole is ravenous, consuming huge amounts of matter — and the MUSE instrument at ESO’s Very Large Telescope (VLT) has caught it playing with its food. This messy eater, contrary to a black hole’s typical all-consuming reputation, is blowing out powerful winds of material. This cone-shaped wind is shown in red in the inset, overlaid on a wider image captured with the MPG/ESO telescope at La Silla. In fact, this wind is moving so fast that it will end up escaping the galaxy altogether, lost to the void of intergalactic space. This is part of a new study that measured how winds move in several nearby galaxies. The MUSE observations show that these incredibly fast winds demonstrate a strange behaviour: they actually speed up far away from the central black hole, accelerating even more on their journey to the galactic outskirts. This process ejects potential star-forming material from a galaxy, suggesting that black holes control the fates of their host galaxies by dampening the stellar birth rate. It also shows that the more powerful black holes impede their own growth by removing the gas and dust they feed on, driving the whole system closer towards a sort of galactic equilibrium. Now, with these new results, we are one step closer to understanding the acceleration mechanism of the winds responsible for shaping the evolution of galaxies, and the history of the universe. Links  Research paper in Nature Astronomy by Marconcini et al. Close-up view of NGC 4945’s nucleus

Astronomers Find ‘Punctum,’ a Bizarre Space Object That Might be Unlike Anything in the Universe

August 15, 2025
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • How we review products
  • Contact

© 2007-2025 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Science News
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Space
  • Future
  • Features
    • Natural Sciences
    • Physics
      • Matter and Energy
      • Quantum Mechanics
      • Thermodynamics
    • Chemistry
      • Periodic Table
      • Applied Chemistry
      • Materials
      • Physical Chemistry
    • Biology
      • Anatomy
      • Biochemistry
      • Ecology
      • Genetics
      • Microbiology
      • Plants and Fungi
    • Geology and Paleontology
      • Planet Earth
      • Earth Dynamics
      • Rocks and Minerals
      • Volcanoes
      • Dinosaurs
      • Fossils
    • Animals
      • Mammals
      • Birds
      • Fish
      • Amphibians
      • Reptiles
      • Invertebrates
      • Pets
      • Conservation
      • Animal facts
    • Climate and Weather
      • Climate change
      • Weather and atmosphere
    • Health
      • Drugs
      • Diseases and Conditions
      • Human Body
      • Mind and Brain
      • Food and Nutrition
      • Wellness
    • History and Humanities
      • Anthropology
      • Archaeology
      • History
      • Economics
      • People
      • Sociology
    • Space & Astronomy
      • The Solar System
      • Sun
      • The Moon
      • Planets
      • Asteroids, meteors & comets
      • Astronomy
      • Astrophysics
      • Cosmology
      • Exoplanets & Alien Life
      • Spaceflight and Exploration
    • Technology
      • Computer Science & IT
      • Engineering
      • Inventions
      • Sustainability
      • Renewable Energy
      • Green Living
    • Culture
    • Resources
  • Videos
  • Reviews
  • About Us
    • About
    • The Team
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
    • Editorial policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact

© 2007-2025 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.