ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science

Home → Science → News

Most Back Pain Treatments Don’t Work—Here’s What Actually Helps

Sometimes, the simplest solutions—moving more, staying strong, and managing stress—are the best we have.

Alexandra GereabyAlexandra Gerea
March 20, 2025
in Health, Mind & Brain, News
A A
Edited and reviewed by Tibi Puiu
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterSubmit to Reddit
a woman on a bed holding her lower back
Image credits: Sasun Bughdaryan.

Low back pain is one of the most common medical complaints in the world. Globally, over 600 million people suffer from it. That means at any given moment, millions of people are searching for relief—visiting doctors, trying alternative therapies, or popping painkillers. This has created an enormous industry that includes some questionable interventions.

But what if most of these treatments don’t actually work?

Seriously, if you feel like nothing is helping your back pain… you’re probably right. A new systematic review (a study of studies) found that only 10% of lower back pain treatments offer significant relief. Researchers found that the vast majority of non-surgical and non-interventional treatments for low back pain are ineffective or have uncertain benefits. So what works?

Most Treatments Hardly Outperform Placebo

This study—the largest of its kind—put various treatments for acute (lasting less than 12 weeks) and chronic (lasting more than 12 weeks) low back pain to the test. The results were startling.

For acute back pain, just one treatment—NSAIDs (like ibuprofen or naproxen)—showed a small but meaningful benefit. Meanwhile, paracetamol (acetaminophen) and glucocorticoid injections, though frequently recommended, were found to have no significant benefit over placebo. Other treatments, like exercise therapy, were also ineffective for acute pain, despite their benefits for chronic pain.

For chronic back pain, only five treatments had moderate-certainty evidence of effectiveness:

  • Exercise therapy;
  • Spinal manipulative therapy (like chiropractic adjustments);
  • Taping (like kinesiology tape);
  • Antidepressants;
  • TRPV1 agonists (such as topical capsaicin creams).

That’s it. Everything else either didn’t work or had too little evidence to say for sure. But here’s the thing: even the things that did work had modest benefits.

RelatedPosts

At least a third of Brits live with chronic pain
You’re probably taking your blood pressure reading wrong
Most Americans with a medical marijuana license use it to treat an evidence-based condition
New imaging method reveals stunning methods of brain connections

We Really Need Better Back Pain Treatments

Some pills work… but most don’t, or provide just modest relief. Image credits: Myriam Zilles.

Overall, the researchers looked at a total of 301 trials (377 comparisons) which provided data on 56 different treatments or treatment combinations. Out of these, just one treatment for acute pain and five for chronic pain worked. Already, that’s concerning, as 9/10 prescribed treatments do almost nothing. But no treatment delivered a major and lasting reduction in pain, and most provided only slight relief.

“Our review did not find reliable evidence of large effects for any of the included treatments, which is consistent with clinical guidelines and our previous review. While we would like to provide more certain recommendations for where to invest and disinvest in treatments, it is not possible at this time,” the study reads.

Researchers emphasize that the evidence for these treatments is weak and unreliable. Many of the studies had small sample sizes, meaning there weren’t enough participants to draw strong conclusions. Some results were inconsistent, with different studies showing conflicting outcomes. For example, glucocorticoid injections and paracetamol for acute back pain, and antibiotics for chronic pain, all had results that overlapped with no effect, suggesting they likely provide little to no benefit. This doesn’t mean they don’t work for some people, just that based on current research, they lack hard proof.

Overall, this study shows that we urgently need better research and more reliable solutions for back pain.

“Evidence is inconclusive for other treatments due to few participants, imprecision, or being of low or very low certainty. Further large, high-quality trials may help reduce the uncertainty in the evidence for these treatments,” the researchers write in the study.

So, What Should You Do for Back Pain?

Some evidence-based interventions.

Again, it’s not that these interventions don’t work necessarily, but the evidence is weak. Based on existing science, nothing is really, truly, guaranteed to make a difference. But based on existing evidence, here’s what seems to have the best chance of working.

For chronic pain, exercise is the best long-term solution. Exercise therapy was one of the few treatments with moderate-certainty evidence of effectiveness. Strength training, stretching, yoga, and aerobic activity can all help. Make sure you don’t make any movements that put unnecessary pressure on your lower back, however. Don’t wait for your back pain to “go away” before exercising. Movement is often the cure. Start slow and build up over time.

NSAIDs also help with acute pain, but they should be used sparingly. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) like ibuprofen or naproxen are the only proven pharmacological treatment for short-term back pain. However, they should not be used long-term due to potential side effects (stomach issues, kidney damage, and cardiovascular risks).

Chiropractic adjustments or osteopathic spinal manipulation showed a small benefit for chronic low back pain. However, the effect was modest, and results varied. Capsaicin, a compound found in chili peppers, can desensitize pain receptors when applied as a cream. The study found moderate-certainty evidence that it helps some people with chronic low back pain.

Also, rather curiously, antidepressants were one of the few pharmaceutical treatments that worked for chronic pain. This suggests a strong mind-body connection in how we experience pain. So taking care of your mental health could also be important as a long-term treatment. This isn’t the first study to suggest a connection between back pain and mental health.

Ultimately, there’s no magic cure for low back pain; or we haven’t found it yet. Most non-surgical treatments don’t work—or barely outperform a placebo. But a few strategies do offer real, albeit modest, relief. If you’re struggling with back pain, your best bet is to stay active, manage expectations, and avoid falling for ineffective or overpriced treatments. Sometimes, the simplest solutions—moving more, staying strong, and managing stress—are the best we have.

The findings are published in the medical journal BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine.

Tags: back pain treatmentschiropractic carechronic painexercise therapyhealth advicelow back painmedical researchNSAIDspain reliefplacebo effect

ShareTweetShare
Alexandra Gerea

Alexandra Gerea

Alexandra is a naturalist who is firmly in love with our planet and the environment. When she's not writing about climate or animal rights, you can usually find her doing field research or reading the latest nutritional studies.

Related Posts

Health

Pulse Oximeters Seem To Be Misreading Oxygen in Darker Skin

byMihai Andrei
4 months ago
Diseases

Women With Endometriosis Say Cutting These 4 Foods Eased Their Pain

byAlexandra Gerea
4 months ago
Genetics

Finally, mRNA vaccines against cancer are starting to become a reality

byMihai Andrei
5 months ago
Health

This Cannabis-Inspired Drug Kills Pain Without Getting You High or Hooked

byTibi Puiu
5 months ago

Recent news

The UK Government Says You Should Delete Emails to Save Water. That’s Dumb — and Hypocritical

August 16, 2025

In Denmark, a Vaccine Is Eliminating a Type of Cervical Cancer

August 16, 2025
This Picture of the Week shows a stunning spiral galaxy known as NGC 4945. This little corner of space, near the constellation of Centaurus and over 12 million light-years away, may seem peaceful at first — but NGC 4945 is locked in a violent struggle. At the very centre of nearly every galaxy is a supermassive black hole. Some, like the one at the centre of our own Milky Way, aren’t particularly hungry. But NGC 4945’s supermassive black hole is ravenous, consuming huge amounts of matter — and the MUSE instrument at ESO’s Very Large Telescope (VLT) has caught it playing with its food. This messy eater, contrary to a black hole’s typical all-consuming reputation, is blowing out powerful winds of material. This cone-shaped wind is shown in red in the inset, overlaid on a wider image captured with the MPG/ESO telescope at La Silla. In fact, this wind is moving so fast that it will end up escaping the galaxy altogether, lost to the void of intergalactic space. This is part of a new study that measured how winds move in several nearby galaxies. The MUSE observations show that these incredibly fast winds demonstrate a strange behaviour: they actually speed up far away from the central black hole, accelerating even more on their journey to the galactic outskirts. This process ejects potential star-forming material from a galaxy, suggesting that black holes control the fates of their host galaxies by dampening the stellar birth rate. It also shows that the more powerful black holes impede their own growth by removing the gas and dust they feed on, driving the whole system closer towards a sort of galactic equilibrium. Now, with these new results, we are one step closer to understanding the acceleration mechanism of the winds responsible for shaping the evolution of galaxies, and the history of the universe. Links  Research paper in Nature Astronomy by Marconcini et al. Close-up view of NGC 4945’s nucleus

Astronomers Find ‘Punctum,’ a Bizarre Space Object That Might be Unlike Anything in the Universe

August 15, 2025
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • How we review products
  • Contact

© 2007-2025 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Science News
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Space
  • Future
  • Features
    • Natural Sciences
    • Physics
      • Matter and Energy
      • Quantum Mechanics
      • Thermodynamics
    • Chemistry
      • Periodic Table
      • Applied Chemistry
      • Materials
      • Physical Chemistry
    • Biology
      • Anatomy
      • Biochemistry
      • Ecology
      • Genetics
      • Microbiology
      • Plants and Fungi
    • Geology and Paleontology
      • Planet Earth
      • Earth Dynamics
      • Rocks and Minerals
      • Volcanoes
      • Dinosaurs
      • Fossils
    • Animals
      • Mammals
      • Birds
      • Fish
      • Amphibians
      • Reptiles
      • Invertebrates
      • Pets
      • Conservation
      • Animal facts
    • Climate and Weather
      • Climate change
      • Weather and atmosphere
    • Health
      • Drugs
      • Diseases and Conditions
      • Human Body
      • Mind and Brain
      • Food and Nutrition
      • Wellness
    • History and Humanities
      • Anthropology
      • Archaeology
      • History
      • Economics
      • People
      • Sociology
    • Space & Astronomy
      • The Solar System
      • Sun
      • The Moon
      • Planets
      • Asteroids, meteors & comets
      • Astronomy
      • Astrophysics
      • Cosmology
      • Exoplanets & Alien Life
      • Spaceflight and Exploration
    • Technology
      • Computer Science & IT
      • Engineering
      • Inventions
      • Sustainability
      • Renewable Energy
      • Green Living
    • Culture
    • Resources
  • Videos
  • Reviews
  • About Us
    • About
    • The Team
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
    • Editorial policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact

© 2007-2025 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.