ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science

Home → Features → Health → Diseases and Conditions

Does eating processed meat cause cancer? The evidence suggest so

The link is nothing new, but some controversy still lingers.

Mihai AndreibyMihai Andrei
January 24, 2022 - Updated on May 2, 2023
in Diseases and Conditions, Food and Nutrition
A A
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterSubmit to Reddit

If your diet is rich in processed meat, you may want to reconsider. Although studies sometimes have different estimates of how bad processed meat is for you, there is a definite link between this type of meat and some forms of cancer.

Image in Wiki Commons.

A growing problem

The link between meat consumption and our health is complex, but processed meat, in particular, has been linked to a number of health problems.

Processed meat refers to any meat that has been transformed through processes like salting, curing, smoking, or any other form of processing, whether it’s to improve its flavor or for preservation. Most processed meat is red meat (either pork or beef), but can be made from other types of meat or meat by-products, including blood.

In North America, around 70% of people consume red or processed meat on any given day, with red meat consumption being slowly on the decline, but processed meat consumption being on the rise. In developing nations, processed meat consumption is generally lower, but also rising. Europe stands as an exception, with the consumption of processed meat being on the decline.

Clear figures are hard to find, because the definition of processed meat is so wide. Overall, though, the world seems to have quite an appetite for processed meat — and it’s a problem.

What the science says

The World Health Organization classifies processed meat as a Group 1 carcinogenic substance, a category that includes things like alcohol, tobacco, ionizing radiation, as well as several pathogens. This classification is mostly based on a report by the  International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a group of international experts that scrutinize large volumes of evidence on cancer research.

In this particular case, the IARC report is based on over 800 studies — it’s as close to scientific consensus as you can get on this issue.

RelatedPosts

Explosive made by alchemists 400 years ago detonates in purple. Scientists finally know why
These are the world’s most livable cities
Trees help keep cities cool and cozy — especially if there’s a lot of them
The Sixth Grand Extinction Will Be ‘Invisible’

Some individual or small scale studies may yield different results (either due to smaller sample size, other confounding factors, or less meticulous methodology), but when you look at the big picture, at all the relevant studies on the matter, processed meat is definitely carcinogenic.

“According to our own findings and from reviewing other quality literature, red/processed meat has a strong risk for carcinogenesis especially in the bowel,” explains Vinod Gopalan, a Senior Lecturer in Histopathology at Griffith University. Gopalan joined other experts on Metafact, a platform that attempts to assess scientific consensus on different topics .

“Our own studies have indicated that controlled dose dependent exposure of some of the chemical molecules from red/processed meat consumption increases normal bowel cell proliferation and activation of many cancer causing genes. This is in alignment with previous experimental studies. “

Other quoted experts expressed similar views. While one sausage won’t kill you, the link between processed meat and some types of cancer is undeniable.

How big is the risk

According to the IARC report, those who ate the most processed meat had around a 17% higher risk of developing bowel cancer (compared to those who ate the least). It’s not just just bowel cancer, either. A study of some 500,000 people published in 2019 found that the risk of colorectal cancer rises by 19% for every daily 25-gram serving. In other words, one slice of ham a day raises your relative risk of colorectal cancer by 19%.

It’s important to keep in mind that this is relative risk. A person has an average risk of around 5% over their entire lifetime (though this varies greatly based on a number of factors), so we’re talking about a 19% increase of this 5% — as in, a 1% overall increase.

Another way of looking at it, according to this study carried out in the UK, is that 1.5% of cancers are caused directly by processed meat. At the population level, this is a significant number — but whether it’s enough to change personal options… that’s a different problem.

Tim Crowe, a nutrition expert quoted by Metafact, comments:

“Even the highest-level committee members of the IARC were not saying that if you eat a sausage you are a candidate for cancer. What they were warning about was that if processed meats were a daily feature of your diet, your risk of bowel cancer would go up.”

“There are multiple factors which should be considered here. For example, hereditary predisposition, salting, other chemical additions during meat processing, fat/oil, alcohol, amount meat consumption and the use of vegetables during this consumption,” Gopalan adds.

More recent research also recommends cutting down on processed meat, especially if you’re a regular consumer. According to a meta-analysis (a study of studies), diets low in processed meat are associated with:

  • 13% lower risk of premature death;
  • 14% reduction in cardiovascular mortality;
  • 14% reduction in non-fatal stroke;
  • 24% reduction in type 2 diabetes;
  • 10% reduction in overall cancer incidence;
  • 11% reduction in cancer mortality.

All these findings are statistically significant and are unlikely to be owed to chance.

However, data is more abundant in wealthier countries, and scarcer in less developed countries, which makes it hard to draw wide conclusions. However, according to some peer-reviewed estimates, some 4.4% of all global deaths worldwide are directly associated with red or processed meat. This link is strong enough that some researchers are debating taxing processed meat as a carcinogen due to its negative impact — much like tobacco is taxed. This type of call is still controversial, but the connection between processed meat and some types of cancer is undeniable. There’s still a very important debate about just how bad it is, and whether it’s optimal to reduce or eliminate processed meat, but the consensus suggests that the link does exist.

The bottom line

The regular consumption of processed meat will likely increase your risk of cancer. Of course, one slice of ham or bacon won’t kill you (neither will one cigarette), but there is a growing body of evidence suggesting that the more processed meat you eat, the more your risk increases.

Eating less processed meat can make a difference, especially if it’s coupled with a healthy diet and an active lifestyle.

ShareTweetShare
Mihai Andrei

Mihai Andrei

Dr. Andrei Mihai is a geophysicist and founder of ZME Science. He has a Ph.D. in geophysics and archaeology and has completed courses from prestigious universities (with programs ranging from climate and astronomy to chemistry and geology). He is passionate about making research more accessible to everyone and communicating news and features to a broad audience.

Related Posts

Culture & Society

What’s Seasonal Body Image Dissatisfaction and How Not to Fall into Its Trap

byAlexandra Gerea
2 days ago
Mind & Brain

Why a 20-Minute Nap Could Be Key to Unlocking ‘Eureka!’ Moments Like Salvador Dalí

byTibi Puiu
2 days ago
Anthropology

The world’s oldest boomerang is even older than we thought, but it’s not Australian

byMihai Andrei
2 days ago
Future

Swarms of tiny robots could go up your nose, melt the mucus and clean your sinuses

byMihai Andrei
2 days ago

Recent news

What’s Seasonal Body Image Dissatisfaction and How Not to Fall into Its Trap

June 28, 2025

Why a 20-Minute Nap Could Be Key to Unlocking ‘Eureka!’ Moments Like Salvador Dalí

June 28, 2025

The world’s oldest boomerang is even older than we thought, but it’s not Australian

June 27, 2025
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • How we review products
  • Contact

© 2007-2025 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Science News
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Space
  • Future
  • Features
    • Natural Sciences
    • Physics
      • Matter and Energy
      • Quantum Mechanics
      • Thermodynamics
    • Chemistry
      • Periodic Table
      • Applied Chemistry
      • Materials
      • Physical Chemistry
    • Biology
      • Anatomy
      • Biochemistry
      • Ecology
      • Genetics
      • Microbiology
      • Plants and Fungi
    • Geology and Paleontology
      • Planet Earth
      • Earth Dynamics
      • Rocks and Minerals
      • Volcanoes
      • Dinosaurs
      • Fossils
    • Animals
      • Mammals
      • Birds
      • Fish
      • Amphibians
      • Reptiles
      • Invertebrates
      • Pets
      • Conservation
      • Animal facts
    • Climate and Weather
      • Climate change
      • Weather and atmosphere
    • Health
      • Drugs
      • Diseases and Conditions
      • Human Body
      • Mind and Brain
      • Food and Nutrition
      • Wellness
    • History and Humanities
      • Anthropology
      • Archaeology
      • History
      • Economics
      • People
      • Sociology
    • Space & Astronomy
      • The Solar System
      • Sun
      • The Moon
      • Planets
      • Asteroids, meteors & comets
      • Astronomy
      • Astrophysics
      • Cosmology
      • Exoplanets & Alien Life
      • Spaceflight and Exploration
    • Technology
      • Computer Science & IT
      • Engineering
      • Inventions
      • Sustainability
      • Renewable Energy
      • Green Living
    • Culture
    • Resources
  • Videos
  • Reviews
  • About Us
    • About
    • The Team
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
    • Editorial policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact

© 2007-2025 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.