Quantcast
ZME Science
  • CoronavirusNEW
  • News
  • Environment
    • Climate
    • Animals
    • Renewable Energy
    • Eco tips
    • Environmental Issues
    • Green Living
  • Health
    • Alternative Medicine
    • Anatomy
    • Diseases
    • Genetics
    • Mind & Brain
    • Nutrition
  • Future
  • Space
  • Feature
    • Feature Post
    • Art
    • Great Pics
    • Design
    • Fossil Friday
    • AstroPicture
    • GeoPicture
    • Did you know?
    • Offbeat
  • More
    • About
    • The Team
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
    • Our stance on climate change
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science

No Result
View All Result
ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
Home Health & Medicine

Non-invasive blood test could detect cancer four years before conventional diagnostic

It can detect cancer before it's even cancer, researchers say.

Mihai Andrei by Mihai Andrei
July 23, 2020
in Health & Medicine, News, Science

A game-changer in cancer detection might be just around the corner. A simple blood test could reveal cancer years before conventional tests — before symptoms even develop.

Image credits: National Cancer Institute.

The quicker you detect any type of cancer, the better your chances to eliminate it without any dangerous complications. Survival rates have improved substantially in recent years, in part due to earlier detection. Unfortunately, detecting cancer early is often difficult — especially before any actual symptoms show up — and the tests themselves are often expensive and unpleasant. But that might soon change.

Using a blood test to detect cancer is not a new idea. It’s extremely challenging, but in the past few years, there have been a few encouraging results. In the latest effort, an international team reports developing a blood test that can detect some types of cancer before it’s even cancer.

“We demonstrated that five types of cancer can be detected through a DNA methylation-based blood test up to four years before conventional diagnosis,” the authors write in the journal Nature Communications.

The team collected blood samples before people had any signs of cancer. They recruited over 123,000 healthy individuals in Taizhou, China, and asked them to undergo annual health checks. This was a huge effort that ultimately required building a specialized warehouse to store the 1.6 million samples that were gathered over time. These volunteers were tracked for 10 years.

The researchers analyzed the blood samples, looking for chemical alterations of the genetic code (called DNA methylation) or telltale blood proteins. They then used machine learning algorithms (a type of artificial intelligence) to look for signs of cancer. They focused on the five most common types of cancer: stomach, esophageal, colorectal, lung, and liver malignancies.

Get more science news like this...

Join the ZME newsletter for amazing science news, features, and exclusive scoops. More than 40,000 subscribers can't be wrong.

   

Out of the volunteers, around 1,000 developed cancer. The algorithm successfully flagged cancer in 88% of the participants who had already been diagnosed — and even more impressively, in 95% who were not diagnosed with cancer, but did go on to develop the disease later. The test, called PanSeer, also correctly identified those without cancer 96% of the time, encouragingly calling false positives in very few cases.

Researchers stress that this test isn’t a predictor of cancer — it’s detecting cancerous growths that are asymptomatic.

“While we have demonstrated early detection of cancer four years before conventional diagnosis through use of a longitudinal cohort, we would like to emphasize that the PanSeer assay is likely not predicting patients that will later develop cancer. Instead, the assay is most likely identifying patients who already have cancerous growths but who remain asymptomatic to current detection methods and standard of care, as many cancers do not cause the appearance of symptoms until late in disease development,” the study reads.

The study has some limitations (the storage is imperfect and could have affected some of the samples, the sample size is not very large, and there are always inherent questions with AI). The tests will also always be unable to detect all cancers. Some cancers evolve very slowly, while others grow quickly and might not even be detected with annual screening — but the results are very promising.

It will still be a while before blood cancer tests start becoming a reality, but if the results are confirmed, it seems like a tangible possibility. Even if the results are imperfect, this could, at the very least, direct other diagnostic mechanisms to where they are most needed.

For instance, this sort of test could be used in at-risk populations or even be incorporated into routine checks. If the results are validated in larger trials, this could be a very useful tool in our fight against cancer.

The study “Non-invasive early detection of cancer four years before conventional diagnosis using a blood test” has been published in Nature Communications.

Mihai Andrei

Mihai Andrei

Andrei's background is in geophysics, and he's been fascinated by it ever since he was a child. Feeling that there is a gap between scientists and the general audience, he started ZME Science -- and the results are what you see today.

Follow ZME on social media

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Coronavirus
  • News
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Future
  • Space
  • Feature
  • More

© 2007-2019 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Coronavirus
  • News
  • Environment
    • Climate
    • Animals
    • Renewable Energy
    • Eco tips
    • Environmental Issues
    • Green Living
  • Health
    • Alternative Medicine
    • Anatomy
    • Diseases
    • Genetics
    • Mind & Brain
    • Nutrition
  • Future
  • Space
  • Feature
    • Feature Post
    • Art
    • Great Pics
    • Design
    • Fossil Friday
    • AstroPicture
    • GeoPicture
    • Did you know?
    • Offbeat
  • More
    • About
    • The Team
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
    • Our stance on climate change
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact

© 2007-2019 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.