Natural News (formerly Newstarget) is a website with approximately 7 million unique monthly visitors (according to Wikipedia) and a massive Facebook following (1.5 million fans). They claim to tackle controversial issues and cover various conspiracy theories, as well as purported health problems caused by allegedly “toxic” ingredients in vaccines, including the now-discredited link to autism. Oh, and of course, they promote and sell dietary supplements. But wait, it gets even better: their founder, Mike Adams doesn’t “believe” in AIDS, he thinks biological engineers are akin to Nazis, he thinks Obama doesn’t have an American citizenship and endorses all sorts of anti-scientific quackery. But hey, let’s meet the rest of the team! Here’s David Icke, the man who believes that the world is controlled by a race of reptiles from outer space who reside in underground tunnels:
“HIV does NOT cause AIDS. HIV does not cause anything. A staggering statement given the hype and acceptance by the scientific establishment and, through them, the public that the HIV virus is the only cause of AIDS. HIV is a weak virus and does not dismantle the immune system. Nor is AIDS passed on sexually.”
Next Level Pseudoscience
We encounter pseudoscience every day, and we generally just ignore it and shake our heads; at most, we’ll explain why they are wrong and highlight what the science actually says. Why then, are we paying so much attention to Natural News? Ironically, the reason lies in the numbers: they do have millions of readers every month, and they user base is growing – they managed to get a huge traction especially on Facebook, and that’s troubling. They’re spreading wrong information, manipulating their readers, and they’re good at it – they’re especially good, as Slate puts it, at moving unsophisticated readers from harmless dietary balderdash to medical quackery to anti-government zealotry.
Also, they’re trying to convince people to reject science and medicine, as well as attempting to convince them to accept completely unsubstantiated and unreasonable conspiracy theories. But it goes even further – they’re spreading hate against actual scientists and the people who actually promote science. Recently, Natural News published a post indirectly calling for the killing of scientists, publishers and journalists who covered GMOs.
“Just as history needed to record the names and deeds of Nazi war criminals, so too must all those collaborators who are promoting the death and destruction caused by GMOs be named for the historical record. The true extent of their collaboration with an anti-human regime will all become readily apparent once the GMO delusion collapses and mass global starvation becomes an inescapable reality.”
Needless to say, in this cesspool of hate and ignorance they’ve created there’s no more room for science. Let’s just have a look at some of the things they were claiming – these are not cherry picked topics, these are the core of what this website is writing:
Astrology is real!
Astrology, the simplest way you can determine if someone is scientifically literate – the belief that groups of stars that look somewhat like… things define your personality and your future! Natural News once claimed that a paper in Nature Neuroscience provided evidence for astrology. Spoiler alert: that’s not what the paper claimed – it actually had nothing to do with planets or stars, as you’d expect from a paper published in Nature Neuroscience.
Eating whole lemons prevents cancer
Sure, some things are healthier than others, and eating some foods encourages cancer, but whenever you read “eating [this food] prevents cancer”, your BS radar should go through the roof.
“The study, published in the journal Nutrition and Cancer in 2000, purported to show a correlation between consumption of lemon peel and diminished cancer risk. The authors surveyed 242 skin cancer survivors and 228 controls about their citrus consumption habits, but the questionnaire wasn’t externally validated and has some screwy definitions. (Eating citrus peel “often,” for example, is defined as “50-75 percent of the time.” What does that mean?),” Slate writes.
This one is actually a bit more complicated. In case you’ve missed all the fuss about vaccines and autism (congrats if you did), a 1998 paper in the influential medical journal The Lancet claimed that the vaccine for measles, mumps, and rubella caused autism. After countless preventable measles outbreaks and a lot of debate, we now know for sure that theclaim is wrong. Literally hundreds of thousands of children have participated in studies around the world showing no association between vaccines and autism. Furthermore, The Lancet has withdrawn that paper and the author has lost his medical license.
Still, a small but very vocal group of people claim that there is an international conspiracy meant to cover up for vaccines. In fact, Natural News has a long history of trying to prey on vulnerable parents and claiming conspiracy theories around everything from gluten to air pollution to antidepressants to the “Western lifestyle.”
I could go on for ages; most of their articles are flawed, instigating, or down right wrong. The fact that such a non-scientific website has such a large following and somehow manages to convince people that they’re presenting real facts is sad, and shouldn’t happen. If you’re interested in actual science and not delusional quackery, you’d do well to stay away from Natural News.