ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science

Home → Health

Scientists inch closer to having a universal cancer blood test

This could be a game changer.

Mihai AndreibyMihai Andrei
January 19, 2018
in Diseases, Health, News
A A
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterSubmit to Reddit

A simple test could revolutionize how we detect cancer and save millions of lives in the process. Johns Hopkins researchers say this could be a game changer.

Something as simple as a blood test could reveal whether people have cancer or not. Image credits: Tom Mallinson.

‘Enormously exciting’

Nowadays, many cancers are treatable — if we can find a way to detect them early on. The problem is, symptoms are often subtle or absent, and can usually be accounted for by a number of other conditions. Meanwhile, invasive cancer tests are unpleasant and can be quite expensive. Being able to detect cancer from a vial of blood would change the game entirely.

The idea isn’t new. Last year, Purdue scientists revealed a promising study focusing on a series of proteins that could effectively signpost the presence of cancer. A different Johns Hopkins team managed to identify mutated DNA in a blood sample as a marker of early-stage cancer.

This time, researchers went on a slightly different path: they wanted to identify eight cancer proteins as well as 16 cancer-related genetic mutations. They drew blood samples from 1,005 people with previously diagnosed ovarian, liver, stomach, pancreatic, esophageal, colorectal, lung, or breast cancer. They also looked at 812 people without cancer diagnoses. The results, researchers say, were ‘enormously exciting.’ Dr. Cristian Tomasetti, the corresponding author of the study, told the BBC:

“This field of early detection is critical, and the results are very exciting. I think this can have an enormous impact on cancer mortality.”

All in all, the team managed to identify cancer up to 98 percent of the time and had only a 1 percent false positive rate.

Cheap and available

To make things even better, the procedure is cheap enough to be administered during a routine physical, making it potentially accessible to the general population.

“The idea is this test would make its way into the public and we could set up screening centers,” says Nickolas Papadopoulos, one of the Johns Hopkins researchers behind the test. “That’s why it has to be cheap and noninvasive.”

The cost of CancerSEEK, as the test has been called, is less than $500 per patient — which is around the same price as a colonoscopy. The price will also likely go down significantly as mass production enters the scene.

RelatedPosts

‘Immortal’ hydras reveal insight about rare but scary contagious cancers
Chernobyl mutant wolves may have evolved resistance to cancer
Smart drug delivery via microcapsules could lead to safe cancer tumor treatment
One mutated protein can be used to make our immune system attack and destroy cancer cells

“I am incredibly excited by this new paper,” says Joshua Schiffman, an oncologist and cancer researcher at the Huntsman Cancer Center at the University of Utah who was not involved in the study. “This is the paper that’s going to set the field in motion.”

However, not everything is ideal. For instance, CancerSEEK was only successful about 40 percent of the time in patients with stage 1 cancers (the earliest stage). This means that it misses cancers more often than it finds them, which could give patients false reassurances — and no one wants that.

Schiffman says that this might end up doing more harm than good in some cases. He says that patients could tell themselves:

 “Even though I have this weird stomach pain that won’t go away, I know it’s not cancer. I’m not going to go to the doctor because the CancerSEEK test told me it was negative,” Schiffman says. “And that would be a terrible thing.”

Another problem is the fact that even if it does detect cancer, the test doesn’t always reveal where the cancer is (ovarian cancer was best detected, with a 98 percent rate of success, but other types had much lower rates). This means people will still have to undergo additional tests. Furthermore, it doesn’t say how advanced the cancer is.

Still, there are reasons to be optimistic. While there is still a great deal of uncertainty, this is the first step in a long journey — and the first step is always the hardest. More work is needed but so far, results are truly promising.

The team is now embarking on a large-scale study involving over 10,000 healthy subjects, to better assess the success rate of CancerSEEK.

Journal Reference: Joshua D. Cohen et al. Detection and localization of surgically resectable cancers with a multi-analyte blood test. DOI: 10.1126/science.aar3247

Tags: cancerdetection

ShareTweetShare
Mihai Andrei

Mihai Andrei

Dr. Andrei Mihai is a geophysicist and founder of ZME Science. He has a Ph.D. in geophysics and archaeology and has completed courses from prestigious universities (with programs ranging from climate and astronomy to chemistry and geology). He is passionate about making research more accessible to everyone and communicating news and features to a broad audience.

Related Posts

A unique eye accessory
Health

Miracle surgery: Doctors remove a hard-to-reach spinal tumor through the eye of a patient

byRupendra Brahambhatt
5 days ago
Health

This Futuristic Laser Blood Test May Be the Key to Beating Cancer Early

byTudor Tarita
4 weeks ago
Health

CT Scans Save Lives But Researchers Now Say They Could Also Be Behind 100,000 Future Cancer Cases

byTibi Puiu
4 weeks ago
Health

Scientists uncover how aspirin may help stop cancer from spreading

byAlexandra Gerea
2 months ago

Recent news

Ancient British Miners Shipped Tin All the Way to the Pharaohs

May 13, 2025

The UK just trained a health AI on 57 million people to predict disease

May 13, 2025

AI and Brain Scans Reveal Why You Struggle to Recognize Faces of People of Other Races

May 13, 2025
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • How we review products
  • Contact

© 2007-2025 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Science News
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Space
  • Future
  • Features
    • Natural Sciences
    • Physics
      • Matter and Energy
      • Quantum Mechanics
      • Thermodynamics
    • Chemistry
      • Periodic Table
      • Applied Chemistry
      • Materials
      • Physical Chemistry
    • Biology
      • Anatomy
      • Biochemistry
      • Ecology
      • Genetics
      • Microbiology
      • Plants and Fungi
    • Geology and Paleontology
      • Planet Earth
      • Earth Dynamics
      • Rocks and Minerals
      • Volcanoes
      • Dinosaurs
      • Fossils
    • Animals
      • Mammals
      • Birds
      • Fish
      • Amphibians
      • Reptiles
      • Invertebrates
      • Pets
      • Conservation
      • Animal facts
    • Climate and Weather
      • Climate change
      • Weather and atmosphere
    • Health
      • Drugs
      • Diseases and Conditions
      • Human Body
      • Mind and Brain
      • Food and Nutrition
      • Wellness
    • History and Humanities
      • Anthropology
      • Archaeology
      • History
      • Economics
      • People
      • Sociology
    • Space & Astronomy
      • The Solar System
      • Sun
      • The Moon
      • Planets
      • Asteroids, meteors & comets
      • Astronomy
      • Astrophysics
      • Cosmology
      • Exoplanets & Alien Life
      • Spaceflight and Exploration
    • Technology
      • Computer Science & IT
      • Engineering
      • Inventions
      • Sustainability
      • Renewable Energy
      • Green Living
    • Culture
    • Resources
  • Videos
  • Reviews
  • About Us
    • About
    • The Team
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
    • Editorial policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact

© 2007-2025 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.