Quantcast
ZME Science
  • News
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Future
  • Space
  • Features
    Menu
    Natural Sciences
    Health
    History & Humanities
    Space & Astronomy
    Technology
    Culture
    Resources
    Natural Sciences

    Physics

    • Matter and Energy
    • Quantum Mechanics
    • Thermodynamics

    Chemistry

    • Periodic Table
    • Applied Chemistry
    • Materials
    • Physical Chemistry

    Biology

    • Anatomy
    • Biochemistry
    • Ecology
    • Genetics
    • Microbiology
    • Plants and Fungi

    Geology and Paleontology

    • Planet Earth
    • Earth Dynamics
    • Rocks and Minerals
    • Volcanoes
    • Dinosaurs
    • Fossils

    Animals

    • Mammals
    • Birds
    • Fish
    • Reptiles
    • Amphibians
    • Invertebrates
    • Pets
    • Conservation
    • Animals Facts

    Climate and Weather

    • Climate Change
    • Weather and Atmosphere

    Geography

    Mathematics

    Health
    • Drugs
    • Diseases and Conditions
    • Human Body
    • Mind and Brain
    • Food and Nutrition
    • Wellness
    History & Humanities
    • Anthropology
    • Archaeology
    • Economics
    • History
    • People
    • Sociology
    Space & Astronomy
    • The Solar System
    • The Sun
    • The Moon
    • Planets
    • Asteroids, Meteors and Comets
    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Cosmology
    • Exoplanets and Alien Life
    • Spaceflight and Exploration
    Technology
    • Computer Science & IT
    • Engineering
    • Inventions
    • Sustainability
    • Renewable Energy
    • Green Living
    Culture
    • Culture and Society
    • Bizarre Stories
    • Lifestyle
    • Art and Music
    • Gaming
    • Books
    • Movies and Shows
    Resources
    • How To
    • Science Careers
    • Metascience
    • Fringe Science
    • Science Experiments
    • School and Study
    • Natural Sciences
    • Health
    • History and Humanities
    • Space & Astronomy
    • Culture
    • Technology
    • Resources
  • Reviews
  • More
    • Agriculture
    • Anthropology
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Electronics
    • Geology
    • History
    • Mathematics
    • Nanotechnology
    • Economics
    • Paleontology
    • Physics
    • Psychology
    • Robotics
  • About Us
    • About
    • The Team
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science

No Result
View All Result
ZME Science

Home → Health

How a free press might have avoided the global pandemic

Electronic censorship and authoritarianism might have been key elements that allowed COVID-19 to spread from China into the world.

Mihai Andrei by Mihai Andrei
March 26, 2020
in Health, News, Science

A report published by Reporters Without Borders (RSF) claims that if China had a free press, which was allowed to function properly, the global pandemic might have been avoided altogether.

To say that China doesn’t have a free press would be an understatement. The so-called “Great Firewall of China” regulates what information can go from China into the world and from the outside world into China. Access to information is limited and censored and severely enforced — not only on the internet, but also in real life, according to instructions coming from the Communist party.

If this hadn’t been the case, RSF claims, there would have been a push for earlier action, preventing the spread of the disease.

“If the authorities had not hidden from the media the existence of an epidemic outbreak linked to a very popular market, the public would have stopped visiting this place long before its official closure on January 1st,” the RSF report reads.

Earlier action could have done all the difference

The study builds on a model from the University of Southampton, which suggests that the number of coronavirus cases in China could have been reduced by 86% if the first containment measures (which were taken on January 20th) had been implemented two weeks earlier.

Word caught on quickly in China when the first cases of a then-unknown type of pneumonia emerged in Wuhan. Doctors realized that several of the patients frequented the Huanan wet market. By December 20th, reports were already mounting.

“If the authorities had not hidden from the media the existence of an epidemic outbreak linked to a very popular market, the public would have stopped visiting this place long before its official closure on January 1st,” RSF explains.

Things took a dramatic turn in late December. The director of the emergency department at Wuhan Central Hospital, Ai Fen, and a group of doctors launch an alert regarding a “SARS-like coronavirus.” Eight of them were arrested by Wuhan police on January 3rd for circulating “false rumors”. Every attempt to communicate this news was squashed, and public awareness was again delayed.

Even as China officially alerted the World Health Organisation (WHO) on December 31st about a potential outbreak, it forced social media censorship of a large number of keywords referring to the epidemic.

Then, on January 5th, Professor Zhang Yongzhen’s team at the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Centre managed to sequence the virus, but the authorities refused to release the data. After six days, the researchers leaked the information to open-source genetics platforms — and their lab is closed as a punitive action. This piece of information would prove crucial for researchers, but again, censorship worked to tangle the situation and delay action.

“If the international media had had full access to information held by the Chinese authorities on the scale of the epidemic before January 13th, it is likely that the international community would have taken stock of the crisis and better anticipated it, reducing the risk of the epidemic spreading outside China and possibly avoiding its transformation into a pandemic,” RSF concludes, emphasizing that China ranks 177th out of 180 in the 2019 RSF World Press Freedom Index.

There is a certain amount of speculation to this conclusion. There’s no guarantee that the reduction in the number of cases would have been enough to prevent the spread of the pandemic, or that other countries would have taken more serious measures at an earlier date. Most nations seem to have not taken the outbreak seriously enough in its earlier phases, and it’s hard to say what the international reaction would have been if they had access to information from the start.

But the conclusion is a poignant one nonetheless: with a free press, the local population in Wuhan would have been better informed about a novel outbreak in their community. The doctors in the hospital would have communicated the emergence of a mysterious type of pneumonia, instead of being reprimanded and silenced by the police; and the researchers would have put scientific information out in the open for the world to see.

The government censors content for mainly political reasons, but also to maintain its control over the populace. The Chinese government asserts its legal right to do so and claims that the censorship rules do not infringe on the citizen’s right to free speech.

Censorship did exactly what it was supposed to: it prevented the spread of information. Except in this case, the stakes weren’t just political: it was an international health (and subsequently, economic) crisis.

It’s a striking reminder that the press plays an important role in a healthy society, and can be an effective watchdog, helping to communicate information when it is most needed.

Eventually, China did take draconic that helped contain the outbreak in Wuhan, but the cases had spread, ultimately leading to the situation we see now.

Was this helpful?
Thanks for your feedback!
Related posts:
  1. The worst of multiple sclerosis can be avoided or delayed with early treatment
  2. Most appendicitis surgeries can be avoided with antibiotics, reports the largest trial yet on the subject
  3. Chronic marijuana use could be avoided by inherent brain ‘high’
  4. Low-carb diets are unsafe and should be avoided
  5. Up to 11,000 deaths were avoided in Europe thanks to cleaner air

ADVERTISEMENT
  • News
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Future
  • Space
  • Features
  • Reviews
  • More
  • About Us

© 2007-2021 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Future
  • Space
  • Features
    • Natural Sciences
    • Health
    • History and Humanities
    • Space & Astronomy
    • Culture
    • Technology
    • Resources
  • Reviews
  • More
    • Agriculture
    • Anthropology
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Electronics
    • Geology
    • History
    • Mathematics
    • Nanotechnology
    • Economics
    • Paleontology
    • Physics
    • Psychology
    • Robotics
  • About Us
    • About
    • The Team
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact

© 2007-2021 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.

Don’t you want to get smarter every day?

YES, sign me up!

Over 35,000 subscribers can’t be wrong. Don’t worry, we never spam. By signing up you agree to our privacy policy.

✕
ZME Science News

FREE
VIEW