ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science

Home → Science → News

EPA dismisses climate change scientists ‘to replace them with industry reps’

Things are getting scarier and scarier.

Mihai AndreibyMihai Andrei
May 8, 2017
in Climate, News
A A
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterSubmit to Reddit

Under president Trump and administrator Scott Pruitt, the Environmental Protection Agency is not staying true to its name — instead, it’s becoming more of an agency protecting the industry. The latest signal of this movement is the dismissal of at least five members of a major scientific review board, rumored to be replaced with industry representatives.

It’s ‘eyes on the prize’ for EPA’s administrator Scott Pruit, and the prize is the fossil fuel industry. Image credits: Gage Skidmore.

According to The New York Times, EPA spokesman J.P. Freire suggested that Scott Pruitt is not interested in maintaining the science-only direction of the board.

“The administrator believes we should have people on this board who understand the impact of regulations on the regulated community,” Freire told the Times.

Freire said the agency wanted “to take as inclusive an approach to regulation as possible,” but his statement is little more than smoke and mirrors. For starters, the move was not announced or properly justified. Although all the scientists being dismissed are at the ends of their three-year terms, they are not political actors and the mandates are generally renewed, barring special circumstances. Still, Freire made it clear that this administration will do everything in its power to wipe the environmental legacy of the Obama administration.

“We’re not going to rubber-stamp the last administration’s appointees. Instead, they should participate in the same open competitive process as the rest of the applicant pool.” Freire added, “We’re making a clean break with the last administration’s approach.”

Scientists have also been vocal against this action, seeing it as a political move which has nothing to do with protecting the environment.

“Most of us on the council are academic people,” said Ponisseril Somasundaran, a chemist at Columbia University who focuses on managing hazardous waste. “I think they want to bring in business and industry people.”

Indeed, it has to be said that this is not an isolated move. It’s not just the fact that president Trump has been vocal about undoing all things environmental or that he believes climate change to be a hoax, but the way his administration has been treating the EPA is very telling of their intentions. Right after he was elected, Trump has issued a media blackout at the EPA, and has ordered employees to remove the climate science pages from the website. Then, administrator Scott Pruit said he doesn’t believe CO2 causes climate change and is taking active steps towards lowering EPA regulations to according to industry lobby. This seems to be the main prize sought by Pruitt and Trump in this regard — favoring the fossil fuel industry.

“This is completely part of a multifaceted effort to get science out of the way of a deregulation agenda,” said Ken Kimmell, the president of the Union of Concerned Scientists. “What seems to be premature removals of members of this Board of Science Counsellors when the board has come out in favour of the EPA strengthening its climate science, plus the severe cuts to research and development – you have to see all these things as interconnected.”

In this context, with all these moves adding up to this, it’s becoming increasingly clear that the EPA is being corrupted from the inside. The science is out there, but Pruitt and like-minded lawmakers in Congress are not interested in hearing it.

“I see the dismissal of the scientists from the Board of Scientific Counsellors as a test balloon,” said Joseph Arvai, an environmental scientist at the University of Michigan who is on the Scientific Advisory Board. “This is clearly very political, and we should be very concerned if it goes further.”

 

RelatedPosts

The lid stays shut on methane emissions despite Pruitt’s wishes, Columbia Court of Appeals judges rule
Eighteen U.S states are taking the EPA to court over weakening emission regulations
EPA moves forward with new standards for drinking water in the US
E.P.A. removes climate science sections from its website
Tags: EPAScott Pruitt

ShareTweetShare
Mihai Andrei

Mihai Andrei

Dr. Andrei Mihai is a geophysicist and founder of ZME Science. He has a Ph.D. in geophysics and archaeology and has completed courses from prestigious universities (with programs ranging from climate and astronomy to chemistry and geology). He is passionate about making research more accessible to everyone and communicating news and features to a broad audience.

Related Posts

Environment

Trump-Appointed EPA Plans to Let Most Polluters Stop Reporting CO2 Emissions

byTibi Puiu
1 month ago
Environment

New Environmental Protection Agency regulations take aim at phasing out hydrofluorocarbons

byAlexandru Micu
4 years ago
Diseases

Trump gives companies “license to pollute” amid coronavirus outbreak

byFermin Koop
5 years ago
News

EPA moves forward with new standards for drinking water in the US

byFermin Koop
5 years ago

Recent news

A Team of Researchers Brought the World’s First Chatbot Back to Life After 60 Years

May 22, 2025
default

From Farms to Lost Cities, Drones Are Quietly Revolutionizing Modern Science

May 22, 2025

Professional Bodybuilders Are Five Times More Likely to Die Suddenly Than Amateurs. Yes, it’s Because of the Drugs

May 22, 2025
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • How we review products
  • Contact

© 2007-2025 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Science News
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Space
  • Future
  • Features
    • Natural Sciences
    • Physics
      • Matter and Energy
      • Quantum Mechanics
      • Thermodynamics
    • Chemistry
      • Periodic Table
      • Applied Chemistry
      • Materials
      • Physical Chemistry
    • Biology
      • Anatomy
      • Biochemistry
      • Ecology
      • Genetics
      • Microbiology
      • Plants and Fungi
    • Geology and Paleontology
      • Planet Earth
      • Earth Dynamics
      • Rocks and Minerals
      • Volcanoes
      • Dinosaurs
      • Fossils
    • Animals
      • Mammals
      • Birds
      • Fish
      • Amphibians
      • Reptiles
      • Invertebrates
      • Pets
      • Conservation
      • Animal facts
    • Climate and Weather
      • Climate change
      • Weather and atmosphere
    • Health
      • Drugs
      • Diseases and Conditions
      • Human Body
      • Mind and Brain
      • Food and Nutrition
      • Wellness
    • History and Humanities
      • Anthropology
      • Archaeology
      • History
      • Economics
      • People
      • Sociology
    • Space & Astronomy
      • The Solar System
      • Sun
      • The Moon
      • Planets
      • Asteroids, meteors & comets
      • Astronomy
      • Astrophysics
      • Cosmology
      • Exoplanets & Alien Life
      • Spaceflight and Exploration
    • Technology
      • Computer Science & IT
      • Engineering
      • Inventions
      • Sustainability
      • Renewable Energy
      • Green Living
    • Culture
    • Resources
  • Videos
  • Reviews
  • About Us
    • About
    • The Team
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
    • Editorial policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact

© 2007-2025 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.