The team behind Interstellar’s awesome special effects meant business when they set out to emulate space, celestial objects and black holes facts as scientifically accurate as possible. In a paper published in the journal Classical and Quantum Gravity, the special effects crew describe at length the innovative computer code they used to generate stunning imagery, but also make new scientific discoveries. Whenever a SciFi movie spews new scientific advancement, well, you know it’s a good one!

Rendering the science of black holes

gargantua black hole

The Gargantua black hole from Interstellar. Credit: Double Negative

Interstellar’s special effects was handled by the London-based visual effects company Double Negative. The people in charge there, per director Christopher Nolan’s request, wanted to work as realistically as possible, so they enlisted world renowned theoretical physicist Kip Thorne, a former professor at Caltech, to guide them towards the  most accurate simulation ever of what a black hole would look like. So,  Thorne started generating equations that would guide their effects software the way physics governs the real world. They all agreed to first start with wormholes. Hundreds of pages and memos were sent back and forth, and in the end all the effort paid off. They had made a stunning crystal ball that reflects back the Universe unto itself.

“Science fiction always wants to dress things up, like it’s never happy with the ordinary universe,” Thorne says. “What we were getting out of the software was compelling straight off.”

Thorne’s diagram of how a black hole distorts light. Credit: Kip Thorne

Thorne’s diagram of how a black hole distorts light. Credit: Kip Thorne

Black Holes were a lot more difficult. Light rays that pass close to the black hole get caught and cannot escape. Therefore, the region around the black hole is a dark disk. Light rays that pass a little further away don’t get caught but do get bent by the black hole’s gravity. This makes the starfield appear distorted, as in a funhouse mirror. It also produces multiple images. You would see two duplicate images of the same star on opposite sides of the black hole, because light rays passing the black hole on either side get bent toward you. In fact, there are infinitely many images of each star, corresponding to light rays that circle the black hole several times before coming toward you.

RELATED  No, a Nigerian didn't solve the Riemann Hypothesis

According to Wired:

Filmmakers often use a technique called ray tracing to render light and reflections in images. “But ray-tracing software makes the generally reasonable assumption that light is traveling along straight paths,” says Eugénie von Tunzelmann, a CG supervisor at Double Negative. This was a whole other kind of physics. “We had to write a completely new renderer,” she says.

Some individual frames took up to 100 hours to render, the computation overtaxed by the bendy bits of distortion caused by an Einsteinian effect called gravitational lensing. In the end the movie brushed up against 800 terabytes of data

Einstein’s theory of general relativity predicts that every object bends light rays through its gravity. This is called gravitational lensing. For our Sun this effect is very weak, but it has been measured. For more massive and distant objects in the Universe much stronger lensing has been seen. However, it has not yet been possible to observe this effect near a black hole, or to directly photograph the dark disk surrounding a black hole.

Gargantua

O'Neill cylinder rendering, one of my favorite shots from the movie. It's inspired by the ship in Arthur C. Clarke's Rendezvous with Rama, a book I highly recommend.

O’Neill cylinder rendering, one of my favorite shots from the movie. It’s inspired by the ship in Arthur C. Clarke’s Rendezvous with Rama, a book I highly recommend.

For their movie, the Double Negative team took an alternate path from conventional special effects for space movies. Instead of tracing individual light ray paths, they simulated bundles of light which proved to be great for mimicking gravitational lensing. In fact, their code is so accurate that astrophysicists are thinking of using it to model their cosmic oddities.

RELATED  How the human brain gets so wrinkled: basic physics

Eventually, Double Negative hit the jackpot and rendered one what’s already one of the most iconic images in science fiction, rivaling Space Odyssey’s Monolith: the Gargantua black hole. The computer code generated the black hole, completed with its glowing accretion disk with unparalleled clarity.

Co-author of the study and chief scientist at Double Negative, Oliver James, said: “To get rid of the flickering and produce realistically smooth pictures for the movie, we changed our code in a manner that has never been done before. Instead of tracing the paths of individual light rays using Einstein’s equations—one per pixel—we traced the distorted paths and shapes of light beams.”

Co-author of the study Kip Thorne said: “This new approach to making images will be of great value to astrophysicists like me. We, too, need smooth images.”

Oliver James continued: “Once our code, called DNGR for Double Negative Gravitational Renderer, was mature and creating the images you see in the movie Interstellar, we realised we had a tool that could easily be adapted for scientific research.”

Here’s an interesting tidbit from the paper. It seems like Gargantua, although stunning and quite accurate, isn’t actually the most faithful rendition of a black hole they could make. The final version of Gargantua features additional code that takes into account the  vast rotational forces that would be created as the black hole spins. Gargantua now looks considerably different, with more matter spewed across one side, while an observer would see different colour because of the Doppler effect.

A more accurate version of Gargantua, published in a science paper recently. Credit: IOP

A more accurate version of Gargantua, published in a science paper recently. Credit: IOP

 

 

Enjoyed this article? Join 40,000+ subscribers to the ZME Science newsletter. Subscribe now!

Like us on Facebook