ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science

Home → Health

Pregnant women with COVID-19 don’t seem to pass the coronavirus to newborns

This is the second study that found no evidence of pregnant mothers with COVID-19 passing the infection to their children.

Tibi PuiubyTibi Puiu
March 16, 2020
in Health, News
A A
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterSubmit to Reddit

Amid reports of country-wide lockdowns and market crashes, finally there’s some good news. According to a recent study from China, pregnant mothers sick with COVID-19, the respiratory disease caused by the novel coronavirus, don’t seem to pass the infection on to their newborn babies.

Although the mothers had COVID-19, their babies tested negative

The researchers Huazhong University of Science and Technology in China monitored the health of four pregnant women who arrived at Wuhan’s Union Hospital sick with COVID-19.

Wuhan, located in Hubei Province, China, is widely considered to be the epicenter of the new pandemic, which has so far infected more than 170,000 people in 153 countries. Most cases have been reported in China, but many countries, particularly in Europe and the USA, are reporting exponential increases in cases on a daily basis.

The four women delivered their babies while they were still infected. However, three of the babies tested negative for COVID-19 and showed no symptoms associated with the disease, such as fever or cough. The fourth baby couldn’t be tested due to the mother declining the procedure, the authors wrote in the journal Frontiers in Pediatrics.

For precaution, all the babies were immediately isolated in neonatal intensive care units and fed formula.

One of the newborns experienced a minor breathing issue, which was resolved after three days of treatment by mechanical ventilation. Two babies, including the one with breathing problems, also had body rashes, but these went away on their own.

Whether or not there’s a connection between the mothers’ COVID-19 and these minor medical problems is rather impossible to determine at this point.

RelatedPosts

Small study showed colchicine improved outcomes in COVID-19 patients
Phase 2 study shows 3-drug combo shortens COVID-19 viral shedding
How to make your own, improvised, effective filtration face mask
Up to one-in-five COVID-19 patients in a new analysis co-infected with another respiratory virus

“We are not sure the rash was due to the mother’s COVID-19 infection,” said study co-author Dr. Yalan Liu at Huazhong University of Science and Technology.

This is the second study that found pregnant mothers seem unlikely to transmit the virus to their newborns.

Previously, a study published in The Lancet, also by Chinese researchers, found no evidence that the viral infection can jump from pregnant women to their offspring at birth.

“Findings from this small group of cases suggest that there is currently no evidence for intrauterine infection caused by vertical transmission in women who develop COVID-19 pneumonia in late pregnancy,” the authors reported in The Lancet.

C-section is deemed safer than natural birth

All nine births were brought to term by C-section, while three of the four pregnancies in the current study were also delivered by C-section.

“To avoid infections caused by perinatal and postnatal transmission, our obstetricians think that C-section may be safer,” Liu said. “Only one pregnant mother adopted vaginal delivery because of the onset of the labor process. The baby was normal. Maybe vaginal delivery is OK. It needs further study.”

The findings are in line with previous coronavirus outbreaks. Studies have not found evidence of viral transmission from mother to child when pregnant women were infected with SARS and MERS, which are caused by different coronavirus strains. However, these outbreaks — which were extremely severe among infected patients compared to COVID-19 — were associated with “critical maternal illness, spontaneous abortion, or even maternal death,” according to Liu.

The two studies have rather small sample sizes. In typical conditions, the low number of reported cases cannot be used to draw definite conclusions. Mothers in other countries might also behave differently, depending on how they’ve been treated by local medical staff.

On Monday, March 16, a newborn baby in England tested positive for COVID-19. The baby’s mother was taken to a north London hospital days before the birth with suspected pneumonia — she also tested positive. Doctors do not know whether the baby became infected in the womb (which the two studies in the article suggest shouldn’t happen) or after birth.

In the future, the researchers plan on conducting more studies. The sensitivity of the diagnostic test used to detect the virus is around 71%, but its reliability in babies is not well understood. To investigate, the researchers plan on collecting and analyzing samples of the placenta, amniotic fluid, neonatal blood, and gastric fluid, among others, to detect possible receptors for the virus.

Tags: coronavirusCOVID-19

ShareTweetShare
Tibi Puiu

Tibi Puiu

Tibi is a science journalist and co-founder of ZME Science. He writes mainly about emerging tech, physics, climate, and space. In his spare time, Tibi likes to make weird music on his computer and groom felines. He has a B.Sc in mechanical engineering and an M.Sc in renewable energy systems.

Related Posts

Diseases

That 2022 Hepatitis Outbreak in Kids? It Was Apparently COVID

byMihai Andrei
4 months ago
Genetics

Finally, mRNA vaccines against cancer are starting to become a reality

byMihai Andrei
5 months ago
Diseases

FLiRT and FLuQE, the new COVID variants making the rounds

byMihai Andrei
1 year ago
Diseases

Moderna’s flu + Covid jab produces “higher immune response” than two separate shots

byMihai Andrei
1 year ago

Recent news

The UK Government Says You Should Delete Emails to Save Water. That’s Dumb — and Hypocritical

August 16, 2025

In Denmark, a Vaccine Is Eliminating a Type of Cervical Cancer

August 16, 2025
This Picture of the Week shows a stunning spiral galaxy known as NGC 4945. This little corner of space, near the constellation of Centaurus and over 12 million light-years away, may seem peaceful at first — but NGC 4945 is locked in a violent struggle. At the very centre of nearly every galaxy is a supermassive black hole. Some, like the one at the centre of our own Milky Way, aren’t particularly hungry. But NGC 4945’s supermassive black hole is ravenous, consuming huge amounts of matter — and the MUSE instrument at ESO’s Very Large Telescope (VLT) has caught it playing with its food. This messy eater, contrary to a black hole’s typical all-consuming reputation, is blowing out powerful winds of material. This cone-shaped wind is shown in red in the inset, overlaid on a wider image captured with the MPG/ESO telescope at La Silla. In fact, this wind is moving so fast that it will end up escaping the galaxy altogether, lost to the void of intergalactic space. This is part of a new study that measured how winds move in several nearby galaxies. The MUSE observations show that these incredibly fast winds demonstrate a strange behaviour: they actually speed up far away from the central black hole, accelerating even more on their journey to the galactic outskirts. This process ejects potential star-forming material from a galaxy, suggesting that black holes control the fates of their host galaxies by dampening the stellar birth rate. It also shows that the more powerful black holes impede their own growth by removing the gas and dust they feed on, driving the whole system closer towards a sort of galactic equilibrium. Now, with these new results, we are one step closer to understanding the acceleration mechanism of the winds responsible for shaping the evolution of galaxies, and the history of the universe. Links  Research paper in Nature Astronomy by Marconcini et al. Close-up view of NGC 4945’s nucleus

Astronomers Find ‘Punctum,’ a Bizarre Space Object That Might be Unlike Anything in the Universe

August 15, 2025
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • How we review products
  • Contact

© 2007-2025 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Science News
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Space
  • Future
  • Features
    • Natural Sciences
    • Physics
      • Matter and Energy
      • Quantum Mechanics
      • Thermodynamics
    • Chemistry
      • Periodic Table
      • Applied Chemistry
      • Materials
      • Physical Chemistry
    • Biology
      • Anatomy
      • Biochemistry
      • Ecology
      • Genetics
      • Microbiology
      • Plants and Fungi
    • Geology and Paleontology
      • Planet Earth
      • Earth Dynamics
      • Rocks and Minerals
      • Volcanoes
      • Dinosaurs
      • Fossils
    • Animals
      • Mammals
      • Birds
      • Fish
      • Amphibians
      • Reptiles
      • Invertebrates
      • Pets
      • Conservation
      • Animal facts
    • Climate and Weather
      • Climate change
      • Weather and atmosphere
    • Health
      • Drugs
      • Diseases and Conditions
      • Human Body
      • Mind and Brain
      • Food and Nutrition
      • Wellness
    • History and Humanities
      • Anthropology
      • Archaeology
      • History
      • Economics
      • People
      • Sociology
    • Space & Astronomy
      • The Solar System
      • Sun
      • The Moon
      • Planets
      • Asteroids, meteors & comets
      • Astronomy
      • Astrophysics
      • Cosmology
      • Exoplanets & Alien Life
      • Spaceflight and Exploration
    • Technology
      • Computer Science & IT
      • Engineering
      • Inventions
      • Sustainability
      • Renewable Energy
      • Green Living
    • Culture
    • Resources
  • Videos
  • Reviews
  • About Us
    • About
    • The Team
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
    • Editorial policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact

© 2007-2025 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.