ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science

Home → Science → News

Another energy rating scandal, Volkswagen style, this time with vacuum cleaners

Couple of weeks ago, Volkswagen admitted it had cheated US tests to make its diesel cars seem more green than they actually were. Later, ZME Science reported companies like Renault, Nissan, Hyundai, Citroen, Fiat or Volvo were also cheating. Then, independent lab tests showed some Samsung TVs were rigged to use less energy during official testing conditions than they do during real-world use. Now, famous British inventor James Dyson is accusing German companies Bosch and Siemens of doing the same thing, gaming energy ratings for their vacuum cleaners.

Tibi PuiubyTibi Puiu
October 22, 2015
in Environment, News
A A
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterSubmit to Reddit

RelatedPosts

Japan, the sixth-largest emitter, pledges to become carbon neutral by 2050
Cutting calories delays ageing, new study shows
Samsø – The World’s Greenest Guinea Pig
Turning waste material into ethanol
James Dyson and one of his vacuum cleaners. Image: Dyson
James Dyson and one of his vacuum cleaners. Image: Dyson

Couple of weeks ago, Volkswagen admitted it had cheated US tests to make its diesel cars seem more green than they actually were. Later, ZME Science reported companies like Renault, Nissan, Hyundai, Citroen, Fiat or Volvo could be also cheating. Independent lab tests showed  some Samsung TVs were rigged to use less energy during official testing conditions than they do during real-world use. Now, famous British inventor James Dyson is accusing German companies Bosch and Siemens of doing the same thing – gaming energy ratings for their vacuum cleaners.

“Bosch has installed control electronics into some of its machines to wrongfully increase energy consumption when in use — to cheat the EU energy label,” said Dyson. “It seems that industry is rife with manufacturers engineering to find their way around tests, rather than engineering better, more efficient technology. This behavior is seriously misleading customers.”

James Dyson is the founder of Dyson, a company that sells vacuum cleaners, bladeless fans, hand dryers and other products in this range. Dyson says the German companies’ vacuum cleaners are actually using twice as much energy as they claim, based on independent testing. At home, these vacuum cleaners apparently use  1,600W of power, instead of the rated 750W. How? Well, Dyson says that all of these tests are made with the dust bag empty. Sensors inside send a signal to the motor once more dust gathers to turn up the power and make the vacuum cleaner actually useful. In this case, a rating of AAAA in test conditions could drop to an E or F in the home.

For Dyson, this kind of cheating also means a lot of lost business. Most of Dyson’s vacuum cleaners are below 1400W, but the best selling models use half as much energy – or so they’re labeled. Dyson says consumers choose these vacuum cleaners, not because they believe they’re better than Dyson models, but because they think they’ll save money on electricity bills.

“It seems that industry is rife with manufacturers engineering to find their way around tests, rather than engineering better, more efficient technology. This behaviour is seriously misleading customers,” Dyson said who also launched legal action against the two companies.

BSH Home Appliances, on behalf of Bosch and Siemens, rejects these accusations.

“All Bosch and Siemens vacuum cleaners are measured in compliance with European energy regulations. Appliance performance at home is consistent with laboratory performance – and any suggestion to the contrary is grossly misleading.

“The purpose of energy labelling is to give consumers a clear and independently-validated indication of energy consumption and broader performance criteria. We have a long and proud tradition of stringent testing.

“We are committed to providing full disclosure on the energy ratings and broader performance of our vacuum cleaners so that consumers can make an informed decision. For reasons we fail to understand, this is not something that Dyson choose to do.

“European commission regulations and energy labelling on vacuum cleaners provide a valuable and reassuring guide that benefits the consumer. We believe that clear, accurate and independent performance information should be available to all consumers – and we are proud to share this.”

Dyson is far from convinced. In fact, the British inventor is quite fed up with the way EU runs its tests.

“[There are] fridges tested with no food, vacuum cleaners tested with no dust, and washing machines tested at inaccurate temperatures,” he claimed. “The regulators clearly live in a place that looks nothing like the real world and manufacturers are taking advantage,” Dyson said speaking for The Telegraph.

If this is true, then Dyson is right: the EU energy ratings are useless and should be overhauled. How many companies are actually cheating these energy ratings? Next year we might be in for some surprises as more and more tests show up.

Tags: energy

ShareTweetShare
Tibi Puiu

Tibi Puiu

Tibi is a science journalist and co-founder of ZME Science. He writes mainly about emerging tech, physics, climate, and space. In his spare time, Tibi likes to make weird music on his computer and groom felines. He has a B.Sc in mechanical engineering and an M.Sc in renewable energy systems.

Related Posts

Future

Everyone Thought ChatGPT Used 10 Times More Energy Than Google. Turns Out That’s Not True

byTibi Puiu
3 weeks ago
Mind & Brain

Your Brain Uses Only 5% More Energy Whether You’re Actively Thinking or Not. So, What Causes Mental Fatigue?

byTibi Puiu
4 weeks ago
News

We Could One Day Power a Galactic Civilization with Spinning Black Holes

byTibi Puiu
3 months ago
Health

Scientists sawed a human brain into 703 cubes to map its energy system for the first time

byTibi Puiu
3 months ago

Recent news

Tennis May Add Nearly 10 Years to Your Life and Most People Are Ignoring It

July 4, 2025

Humans Have Been Reshaping Earth with Fire for at Least 50,000 Years

July 4, 2025

The Strangest Microbe Ever Found Straddles The Line Between Life and Non-Life

July 4, 2025
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • How we review products
  • Contact

© 2007-2025 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Science News
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Space
  • Future
  • Features
    • Natural Sciences
    • Physics
      • Matter and Energy
      • Quantum Mechanics
      • Thermodynamics
    • Chemistry
      • Periodic Table
      • Applied Chemistry
      • Materials
      • Physical Chemistry
    • Biology
      • Anatomy
      • Biochemistry
      • Ecology
      • Genetics
      • Microbiology
      • Plants and Fungi
    • Geology and Paleontology
      • Planet Earth
      • Earth Dynamics
      • Rocks and Minerals
      • Volcanoes
      • Dinosaurs
      • Fossils
    • Animals
      • Mammals
      • Birds
      • Fish
      • Amphibians
      • Reptiles
      • Invertebrates
      • Pets
      • Conservation
      • Animal facts
    • Climate and Weather
      • Climate change
      • Weather and atmosphere
    • Health
      • Drugs
      • Diseases and Conditions
      • Human Body
      • Mind and Brain
      • Food and Nutrition
      • Wellness
    • History and Humanities
      • Anthropology
      • Archaeology
      • History
      • Economics
      • People
      • Sociology
    • Space & Astronomy
      • The Solar System
      • Sun
      • The Moon
      • Planets
      • Asteroids, meteors & comets
      • Astronomy
      • Astrophysics
      • Cosmology
      • Exoplanets & Alien Life
      • Spaceflight and Exploration
    • Technology
      • Computer Science & IT
      • Engineering
      • Inventions
      • Sustainability
      • Renewable Energy
      • Green Living
    • Culture
    • Resources
  • Videos
  • Reviews
  • About Us
    • About
    • The Team
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
    • Editorial policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact

© 2007-2025 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.