Quantcast
ZME Science
  • News
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Future
  • Space
  • Features
    Menu
    Natural Sciences
    Health
    History & Humanities
    Space & Astronomy
    Technology
    Culture
    Resources
    Natural Sciences

    Physics

    • Matter and Energy
    • Quantum Mechanics
    • Thermodynamics

    Chemistry

    • Periodic Table
    • Applied Chemistry
    • Materials
    • Physical Chemistry

    Biology

    • Anatomy
    • Biochemistry
    • Ecology
    • Genetics
    • Microbiology
    • Plants and Fungi

    Geology and Paleontology

    • Planet Earth
    • Earth Dynamics
    • Rocks and Minerals
    • Volcanoes
    • Dinosaurs
    • Fossils

    Animals

    • Mammals
    • Birds
    • Fish
    • Reptiles
    • Amphibians
    • Invertebrates
    • Pets
    • Conservation
    • Animals Facts

    Climate and Weather

    • Climate Change
    • Weather and Atmosphere

    Geography

    Mathematics

    Health
    • Drugs
    • Diseases and Conditions
    • Human Body
    • Mind and Brain
    • Food and Nutrition
    • Wellness
    History & Humanities
    • Anthropology
    • Archaeology
    • Economics
    • History
    • People
    • Sociology
    Space & Astronomy
    • The Solar System
    • The Sun
    • The Moon
    • Planets
    • Asteroids, Meteors and Comets
    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Cosmology
    • Exoplanets and Alien Life
    • Spaceflight and Exploration
    Technology
    • Computer Science & IT
    • Engineering
    • Inventions
    • Sustainability
    • Renewable Energy
    • Green Living
    Culture
    • Culture and Society
    • Bizarre Stories
    • Lifestyle
    • Art and Music
    • Gaming
    • Books
    • Movies and Shows
    Resources
    • How To
    • Science Careers
    • Metascience
    • Fringe Science
    • Science Experiments
    • School and Study
    • Natural Sciences
    • Health
    • History and Humanities
    • Space & Astronomy
    • Culture
    • Technology
    • Resources
  • Reviews
  • More
    • Agriculture
    • Anthropology
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Electronics
    • Geology
    • History
    • Mathematics
    • Nanotechnology
    • Economics
    • Paleontology
    • Physics
    • Psychology
    • Robotics
  • About Us
    • About
    • The Team
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact
No Result
View All Result
ZME Science

No Result
View All Result
ZME Science

Home → Science

US could be carbon neutral by 2050 – and it would cost $1 per citizen per day

Having a clean economy is much cheaper than the alternative.

Fermin Koop by Fermin Koop
February 23, 2021
in Climate, Environment, News, Science

Getting to net-zero emissions in the United States is not only surprisingly feasible but also affordable, according to a new study. Researchers found that transforming the country’s energy infrastructure to run mainly on renewables would have a net cost of about $1 per person per day.

An oil refinery. Image credit: Flickr / David Seibold

Per-capita carbon emissions in the US are some of the highest in the world, according to the World Bank, with the country emitting 17.6 tons of carbon per person in 2016. The country is second only to China in its total contributions to climate change, which means the climate actions that it takes can make a big difference for the entire world.

Researchers from the Berkeley Laboratory, the University of San Francisco and the consulting firm Evolved Energy Research looked at pathways by which the US could become carbon neutral by 2050. They focused on reductions in energy and industrial (E&I) emissions, which constitutes more than 80% of the country’s emissions.

“By methodically increasing energy efficiency, switching to electric technologies, utilizing clean electricity (especially wind and solar power), and deploying a small amount of carbon capture technology, the United States can reach zero emissions,” the authors write in the paper. “Cost is about $1 per person per day, not counting climate benefits.”

Berkeley Lab senior scientist Margaret Torn, one of the study’s lead authors, said that decarbonization of the American energy system would require a major infrastructure overhaul. The country would have to build new wind and solar plants and transmission lines, deploy a fleet of electric cars and light trucks and replace conventional furnaces and water heaters with heat pumps, he argued. But it can be done.

All pathways used four basic strategies: energy efficiency, decarbonized electricity, electrification, and carbon capture. Net costs of a carbon neutral economy ranged between 0.2% to 1.2% of the GDP. Least‐cost pathways were based on more than 80% wind and solar electricity plus thermal generation for reliability. A 100% renewable primary energy system was feasible but more expensive.

“We were pleasantly surprised that the cost of the transformation is lower now than in similar studies we did five years ago, even though this achieves much more ambitious carbon reduction,” Torn said in a statement. “The main reason is that the cost of wind and solar power and batteries for electric vehicles has declined faster than expected.”

Costs would actually be lower if the economic and climate benefits of decarbonizing the economy would be included, the study found. Leaving behind fossil fuels would mean less money spent on oil and fewer impacts of climate change, such as extreme droughts, air and water pollution from fossil fuels, and improved public health.

The researchers created the pathways using new energy models that included details of energy consumption and production for 16 geographic regions in the US. The costs were then calculated using projections for fossil fuel and renewable energy prices from the Annual Energy Outlook for the US Department of Energy, among other sources. They come mainly from building the new infrastructure.

Regardless of the long-term differences between each pathway, the study found that the actions that have to be taken in the next 10 years are actually very similar. The US has to increase the generation and transmission of renewable energy, ensure that all new infrastructure is low carbon, such as cars or buildings, and maintain its current gas capacity for reliability.

“We don’t need to have a big battle now over questions like the near-term construction of nuclear power plants, because new nuclear is not required in the next ten years to be on a net-zero emissions path. Instead, we should make policy to drive the steps that we know are required now.” study lead author Jim Williams said in a statement

Previous studies have made similar arguments over the transition of the US economy to decarbonization. But the researchers believe this is the first one to give a detailed description of how the US energy and industrial system can be a source of negative emissions by 2050 – meaning more CO2 is taken out of the atmosphere than added.

The study was published in the journal AGU Advances.

Was this helpful?
Thanks for your feedback!
Related posts:
  1. Japan, the sixth-largest emitter, pledges to become carbon neutral by 2050
  2. Europe wants to go carbon neutral by 2050. These four countries opposed it
  3. What does it mean for New Zealand to become carbon neutral?
  4. The recipe for a carbon-neutral UK? Less meat, more trees and peatland
  5. Will the World Cup in Qatar be carbon-neutral? Probably not, experts claim
Tags: decarbonizationnet zero

ADVERTISEMENT
  • News
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Future
  • Space
  • Features
  • Reviews
  • More
  • About Us

© 2007-2021 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Future
  • Space
  • Features
    • Natural Sciences
    • Health
    • History and Humanities
    • Space & Astronomy
    • Culture
    • Technology
    • Resources
  • Reviews
  • More
    • Agriculture
    • Anthropology
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Electronics
    • Geology
    • History
    • Mathematics
    • Nanotechnology
    • Economics
    • Paleontology
    • Physics
    • Psychology
    • Robotics
  • About Us
    • About
    • The Team
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact

© 2007-2021 ZME Science - Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.

Don’t you want to get smarter every day?

YES, sign me up!

Over 35,000 subscribers can’t be wrong. Don’t worry, we never spam. By signing up you agree to our privacy policy.

✕
ZME Science News

FREE
VIEW