homehome Home chatchat Notifications


NASA gets $19.285B in 2016 budget - slightly more than requested

After months of delays and years of underfunding, the US Congress finally revealed its plans for funding the federal government in 2016.

Dragos Mitrica
December 16, 2015 @ 5:38 pm

share Share

After months of delays and years of underfunding, the US Congress finally revealed its plans for funding the federal government in 2016. If the budget passes without major modifications, NASA will finally get what it asked for – and even a bit more. The space agency is set to receive $19.3 billion—nearly $1.3 billion more than in 2015.

Finally, a budget

nasa budget

It’s been a tough few years for NASA in terms of funding. The Obama administration significantly slashed NASA’s budget, and Republicans wanted to push it even further – they wanted NASA to stop studying Earth completely, annoyed by the agency’s findings on climate change. So it’s quite surprising to see that the space agency’s budget was not only approved, but even surpassed.

This money will allow both the MER Opportunity rover and the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter to continue science operations, as stressed by researchers. It also provides $175 million for the new Europa mission, allowing them to develop a lander, and an additional $25 million for “icy satellites surface technology” development. The Mars 2020 rover gets an additional $22 million to keep the project on track.

In terms of commercial crew, NASA will get $1.243 billion to keep both Boeing’s CST-100 Starliner and SpaceX’s Dragon V2 on track for 2017.

Putting things into perspective

Sure, it’s great that they got what they asked for (and a very small bonus, to preempt potential delays), but when you think about it, $19 billion is not that much for the US budget. The country spent 3% of their GDP on military projects – that translates into $581 billion, 30 times more than NASA. Even the so-called black budget, the budget allocated for confidential projects or money that the military doesn’t want to justify was estimated at $50 billion in 2009. A single warship, the USS Gerald Ford, deployed in 2016, costs upward of $13 billion. A single Air Force F-35A costs a whopping $148 million, while a Marine Corps F-35B costs an unbelievable $251 million. A lone Navy F-35C costs a mind-boggling $337 million. This simply dwarfs NASA’s budget by comparison.

Still, if passed, the budget will be very significant – if not for anything else, then for breaking a chain of saddening budget cuts.

The bill was labeled an “omnibus” because it mushes together what would have been twelve separate pieces of legislation into a single, 2,000 page epic.

share Share

Why You Should Stop Using Scented Candles—For Good

They're seriously not good for you.

People in Thailand were chewing psychoactive nuts 4,000 years ago. It's in their teeth

The teeth Chico, they never lie.

To Fight Invasive Pythons in the Everglades Scientists Turned to Robot Rabbits

Scientists are unleashing robo-rabbits to trick and trap giant invasive snakes

Lab-Grown Beef Now Has Real Muscle Fibers and It’s One Step Closer to Burgers With No Slaughter

In lab dishes, beef now grows thicker, stronger—and much more like the real thing.

From Pangolins to Aardvarks, Unrelated Mammals Have Evolved Into Ant-Eaters 12 Different Times

Ant-eating mammals evolved independently over a dozen times since the fall of the dinosaurs.

Potatoes were created by a plant "love affair" between tomatoes and a wild cousin

It was one happy natural accident.

Quakes on Mars Could Support Microbes Deep Beneath Its Surface

A new study finds that marsquakes may have doubled as grocery deliveries.

Scientists Discover Life Finds a Way in the Deepest, Darkest Trenches on Earth

These findings challenge what we thought we knew about life in the deep sea.

Solid-State Batteries Charge in 3 Minutes, Offer Nearly Double the Range, and Never Catch Fire. So Why Aren't They In Your Phones and Cars Yet?

Solid state are miles ahead lithium-ion, but several breakthroughs are still needed before mass adoption.

What if the Secret to Sustainable Cities Was Buried in Roman Cement?

Is Roman concrete more sustainable? It's complicated.