homehome Home chatchat Notifications


NASA says a gargantuan supermassive black hole is somehow missing

The hunt is on for black hole with up 100 billion solar masses that is nowhere to be found.

Tibi Puiu
December 18, 2020 @ 7:25 pm

share Share

This image of Abell 2261 contains X-ray data from Chandra (pink) showing hot gas pervading the cluster as well as optical data from Hubble and the Subaru Telescope that show galaxies in the cluster and in the background. Astronomers used these telescopes to search the galaxy in the center of the image for evidence of a black hole, weighing between 3 and 100 billion times the Sun, that is expected to be there. No sign of this black hole was found, deepening a mystery about what is happening in this system. Credit: NSF/NASA/University of Michigan.

Astronomers surveying the heart of the giant galaxy cluster Abell 2261 were expecting to find a hefty supermassive black hole, with an appetite for matter and energy that matched the enormous scale of its cosmic home. But although the supermassive black hole should have had a mass between 3 to 100 billion times that of the sun — very conspicuous to most observations — there was no object to be found. NASA scientists don’t know what to make of the missing black hole and its elusive nature may be yet another reminder that we still know very little about these mysterious objects.

Just like stars cluster around the core of a galaxy, so do galaxies group together, bound by the gravity of an extremely dense core. Most known galaxies, including the Milky Way, have a supermassive black hole at their core that keeps their stars together. Similarly, clusters of hundreds or thousands of galaxies have a core, with an even larger supermassive black hole bounding all those galaxies in place. The galaxy nearest this core is known as the brightest cluster galaxy (BCG) — this is where the cluster’s most important supermassive black hole should be found.

Abell 2261’s BCG is a staggering one million light-years across, making it about 10 times larger than the Milky Way. What’s more, it has a huge core 10,000 light-years across, the largest galactic core ever found.

But, defying all expectations, a team of astronomers led by Kayhan Gultekin from the University of Michigan couldn’t find any supermassive black hole in the galaxy in the middle of Abell 2261, located about 2.7 billion light-years from Earth.

The giant elliptical galaxy in the center of this image, taken by the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, is the most massive and brightest member of the galaxy cluster Abell 2261. Astronomers refer to it as the brightest cluster galaxy (BCG). Spanning a little over one million light-years, the galaxy is about 20 times the diameter of our Milky Way galaxy. Credit: NASA, HST.

The astronomers employed the most sophisticated techniques and searched the sky using NASA’s Chandra X-Ray Observatory and the Hubble Space Telescope, however they were quite surprised when they came out empty-handed. After all, an object that could weigh as much as 100 billion times the mass of the sun shouldn’t be able to hide easily. For comparison, the Milky Way’s supermassive black hole has 4 million solar masses.

As a black hole devours matter, some of the material becomes superheated at it falls towards the black hole, producing X-rays in the process. However, the scientists did not detect any such source. This is the second time that researchers have failed to find the supermassive black hole at the center of Abell 2261’s large central galaxy, after previous attempts that employed Chandra data obtained in 1999 and 2004. So perhaps there really isn’t any black hole — at least not where scientists have been expecting.

It’s possible the black hole was ejected from the host galaxy’s center as a result of two galaxies merging to form the observed one. When two black holes merge, they produce gravitational waves that may be stronger in one direction than another, so the newly formed supermassive black hole might have been ejected from the center of the galaxy in the opposite direction. Scientists call this a recoiling black hole.

But that’s all in theory. We don’t have any evidence that supermassive black holes can merge, let alone evidence of a black hole recoiling. To date, researchers have only confirmed the mergers of much smaller black holes.

Alternatively, the black hole may not be active enough to produce noticeable amounts of X-rays to show up in Chandra observations, although that sounds a bit implausible given the expected scale. Finally, the black hole may simply not exist.

These hypotheses may be verified once NASA’s upcoming James Webb Telescope comes into operation.

The findings are due to be published in the journal of the American Astronomical Society. In the meantime, it is available online on the pre-print server arXiv.

share Share

Why You Should Stop Using Scented Candles—For Good

They're seriously not good for you.

People in Thailand were chewing psychoactive nuts 4,000 years ago. It's in their teeth

The teeth Chico, they never lie.

To Fight Invasive Pythons in the Everglades Scientists Turned to Robot Rabbits

Scientists are unleashing robo-rabbits to trick and trap giant invasive snakes

Lab-Grown Beef Now Has Real Muscle Fibers and It’s One Step Closer to Burgers With No Slaughter

In lab dishes, beef now grows thicker, stronger—and much more like the real thing.

From Pangolins to Aardvarks, Unrelated Mammals Have Evolved Into Ant-Eaters 12 Different Times

Ant-eating mammals evolved independently over a dozen times since the fall of the dinosaurs.

Potatoes were created by a plant "love affair" between tomatoes and a wild cousin

It was one happy natural accident.

Quakes on Mars Could Support Microbes Deep Beneath Its Surface

A new study finds that marsquakes may have doubled as grocery deliveries.

Scientists Discover Life Finds a Way in the Deepest, Darkest Trenches on Earth

These findings challenge what we thought we knew about life in the deep sea.

Solid-State Batteries Charge in 3 Minutes, Offer Nearly Double the Range, and Never Catch Fire. So Why Aren't They In Your Phones and Cars Yet?

Solid state are miles ahead lithium-ion, but several breakthroughs are still needed before mass adoption.

What if the Secret to Sustainable Cities Was Buried in Roman Cement?

Is Roman concrete more sustainable? It's complicated.