homehome Home chatchat Notifications


'It's not your fault': Two-thirds of cancers are due to random genetic mutations, but lifestyle is still very important

Only 29 percent of cancers can be attributed to lifestyle or environmental factors while heritability could explain 5 percent of cancer mutations.

Tibi Puiu
March 24, 2017 @ 3:41 pm

share Share

A staggering 66 percent of cancer mutations result from copying errors, according to a new study published by the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center. Only 29 percent of cancers can be attributed to lifestyle or environmental factors while heritability could explain 5 percent of cancer mutations, according to the researchers who are careful to point out that it’s still very important to avoid environmental agents that increase the risk of developing cancer mutations — such as smoking.

bad news

A game of chance

“It is well-known that we must avoid environmental factors such as smoking to decrease our risk of getting cancer. But it is not as well-known that each time a normal cell divides and copies its DNA to produce two new cells, it makes multiple mistakes,” says Cristian Tomasetti, Ph.D., assistant professor of biostatistics at the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center and the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. “These copying mistakes are a potent source of cancer mutations that historically have been scientifically undervalued, and this new work provides the first estimate of the fraction of mutations caused by these mistakes.”

Tomasetti and Bert Vogelstein, the co-director of the Ludwig Center at the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, previously reported in 2015 how random genetic mutations could explain why certain cancers in the U.S. are far more prevalent than others, such as colon cancer vs brain cancer. These findings proved controversial as critics pointed out the study only included data from the U.S. and other common cancers like breast or prostate cancers were not included.

This time, the two and their colleagues looked at data across 32 types of cancer using DNA sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and epidemiologic data from the Cancer Research UK database. Two or more critical gene mutations are necessary for cancer to surface, and according to a mathematical model developed at Johns Hopkin some 66 percent of cancer cases can be explained by random mutations. These findings seem to concur with previous epidemiologic studies which found 40 percent of cancers can be prevented by avoiding unhealthy environments and lifestyles.

That’s on average since other forms of cancer are more vulnerable to genetic mutations than others. For instance, for prostate, brain or bone cancer, 95 of cancer mutations are due to random copying errors. For lung cancer, on the other hand, 65 percent of the mutations were due to environmental factors, mostly related to smoking, and only 35 percent of the mutations were caused by DNA copying errors.

“We need to continue to encourage people to avoid environmental agents and lifestyles that increase their risk of developing cancer mutations. However, many people will still develop cancers due to these random DNA copying errors, and better methods to detect all cancers earlier, while they are still curable, are urgently needed,” says Vogelstein.

Vogelstein says his team’s approach to studying cancer mutations is akin to sorting out why typos typing a 20-volume book.

“You can reduce your chance of typographical errors by making sure you’re not drowsy while typing and that your keyboard isn’t missing some keys,” says Vogelstein. “But typos will still occur because no one can type perfectly. Similarly, mutations will occur, no matter what your environment is, but you can take steps to minimize those mutations by limiting your exposure to hazardous substances and unhealthy lifestyles.”

The findings might come as a surprise to many people. They mean that even if you follow a strict healthy lifestyle and even have no history of cancer in your family, you can still get it. At the same time, some might feel relieved knowing they didn’t do something particularly wrong to ‘deserve’ cancer. In most cases, it seems, a cancer patient’s biggest fault is growing older. That’s because the more cells divide, the higher the risk for copying mistakes in the DNA of cells in an organ.

“It’s not your fault,” says Vogelstein. “Nothing you did or didn’t do was responsible for your illness.”

As the population grows both in numbers and life expectancy, cancer will only become more prevalent as more DNA copying errors compound.

Reference: Cristian Tomasetti, Lu Li, Bert Vogelstein. Stem cell divisions, somatic mutations, cancer etiology, and cancer prevention. Science, 2017 DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf9011

share Share

The Universe’s First “Little Red Dots” May Be a New Kind of Star With a Black Hole Inside

Mysterious red dots may be a peculiar cosmic hybrid between a star and a black hole.

Peacock Feathers Can Turn Into Biological Lasers and Scientists Are Amazed

Peacock tail feathers infused with dye emit laser light under pulsed illumination.

Helsinki went a full year without a traffic death. How did they do it?

Nordic capitals keep showing how we can eliminate traffic fatalities.

Scientists Find Hidden Clues in The Alexander Mosaic. Its 2 Million Tiny Stones Came From All Over the Ancient World

One of the most famous artworks of the ancient world reads almost like a map of the Roman Empire's power.

Ancient bling: Romans May Have Worn a 450-Million-Year-Old Sea Fossil as a Pendant

Before fossils were science, they were symbols of magic, mystery, and power.

This AI Therapy App Told a Suicidal User How to Die While Trying to Mimic Empathy

You really shouldn't use a chatbot for therapy.

This New Coating Repels Oil Like Teflon Without the Nasty PFAs

An ultra-thin coating mimics Teflon’s performance—minus most of its toxicity.

Why You Should Stop Using Scented Candles—For Good

They're seriously not good for you.

People in Thailand were chewing psychoactive nuts 4,000 years ago. It's in their teeth

The teeth Chico, they never lie.

To Fight Invasive Pythons in the Everglades Scientists Turned to Robot Rabbits

Scientists are unleashing robo-rabbits to trick and trap giant invasive snakes