homehome Home chatchat Notifications


Did WWI Dazzle Camouflage Actually Work? Scientists Revisit a 105-Year-Old Experiment to Find Out

Painting ships like zebras was a bold move, but it likely didn't fool U-boats. Something else worked though.

Tibi Puiu
March 18, 2025 @ 8:02 pm

share Share

Ship with stripped dazzle camouflage
Credit: Warfare History Network.

During World War I, the Atlantic was in chaos. German U-boats prowled the seas, looking for Allied ships to destroy. To counter this threat, Britain turned to an unlikely tool: art. Bold, irregular geometric patterns — known as dazzle camouflage — were painted on ships to confuse enemy submariners.

The idea was simple: distort the perception of a ship’s speed, direction, and size, making it harder to target. But did it ever work? A new study revisits a century-old experiment to find out.

The original research, conducted in 1919 by Leo Blodgett, an MIT student, claimed that dazzle camouflage could mislead observers by up to 60 degrees. But when Timothy Meese and Samantha Strong of Aston University reanalyzed Blodgett’s data, they found a much more diminished effect than claimed. The dazzle effect was just 7 degrees of misdirection.

Instead, a much larger perceptual bias, unrelated to the dazzle camouflage, was at play: the “horizon effect”.

Dazzled and Confused

Images of ships with dazzle camouflage
Examples of dazzle ships. Credit: i-Perception (2025). DOI: 10.1177/20416695241312316

Dazzle camouflage was born of desperation. Submarines were a relatively new weapon at the time and were wreaking havoc on Allied shipping. No good counter had yet been invented. Traditional camouflage, designed to blend ships into the ocean, was ineffective. Instead, artists like Norman Wilkinson proposed using high-contrast patterns to disrupt the enemy’s ability to judge a ship’s course. “The only course open is to paint [each ship] in such a way as to deceive the attacker as to her size and course,” Wilkinson wrote in 1917.

U-boat commanders had to fire in anticipation of where a ship was heading and dazzle aimed to break up the constructional lines, making it difficult to identify a ship and estimate its speed, range and course. Thousands of merchant ships and hundreds of naval vessels were “dazzled” by the end of WWI. Dazzle camouflage was resurrected by the U.S. during World War II, and was used on the decks of ships as well, in an effort to confuse enemy aircraft.

Diagram showing how dazzle camouflage is meant to work
The logic of dazzle camouflage. Credit: Wikimedia Commons.

It was only after the war that someone like Blodgett actually thought of doing an experiment to scientifically test this idea. Using scale models and mechanical simulations, he reported dramatic errors in observers’ perceptions of ship direction. But his methods were flawed. The study lacked modern statistical rigor, and its organization made it difficult to evaluate. Meese and Strong corrected these flaws and redid the experiment with modern tools.

The horizon beats the dazzle

What they discovered was surprising. While Blodgett had attributed the large perception errors to the dazzle patterns, Meese and Strong found that most of the misdirection came from a phenomenon they call “hysteresis.” This is a tendency for observers to perceive a ship’s direction as closer to the horizon, regardless of its actual course. This optical illusion is so powerful that even experienced naval officers fall for it.

The effect was substantial, causing errors of 19 to 23 degrees. The dazzle patterns themselves contributed only a small twist of about 7 degrees.

“The bow of the ship would sometimes twist towards the observer, not away,” said Meese, a vision scientist at Aston University. “This was unexpected and shows how complex visual perception can be.”

So the twist effect is real, but it’s much smaller than Blodgett thought. The bigger effect is this pull toward the horizon, which has nothing to do with the camouflage.

To confirm their findings, Meese and Strong conducted a new experiment using edited images of Blodgett’s original ship models. They replaced the dazzle patterns with neutral gray and asked participants to judge the ships’ directions. Both dazzle-painted ships and plain ones produced the horizon effect.

“This is a clear case where perception overrides knowledge,” said Professor Meese. “Back then, no one realized the horizon effect existed. Blodgett attributed all the confusion to dazzle camouflage. But now we know better.”

Why Did Dazzle Camouflage Fall Short?

Why didn’t dazzle camouflage live up to its promise? One possibility is that the patterns were too subtle to overcome the natural biases in human perception. Another is that the conditions at sea — changing light, weather, and waves — made it difficult for the patterns to have a consistent effect.

Its military effectiveness remains debated. While some reports claimed that dazzle-painted ships were less likely to be sunk, others found no clear evidence of its success. For instance, in the first quarter after dazzled ships entered service with the Royal Navy, around 72% of dazzled ships that were attacked were sunk, compared to around 62% of non-dazzled ships. However, during the second quarter the fortunes were reversed: 60% of attacked dazzled ships were sunk compared to 68% of no-dazzled ships. 

As for Blodgett, his work may have overestimated the power of dazzle, but it remains a fascinating chapter in the history of science and war. He was ahead of his time in trying to quantify these effects. Today’s scientists are just picking up where they left off.

The findings appeared in the journal i-Perception.

share Share

Cheese Before Bed Might Actually Be Giving You Nightmares

Eating dairy or sweets late at night may fuel disturbing dreams, new study finds.

Scientists Ranked the Most Hydrating Drinks and Water Didn't Win

Milk is more hydrating than water. Here's why.

Methane Leaks from Fossil Fuels Hit Record Highs. And We're Still Looking the Other Way

Powerful leaks, patchy action, and untapped fixes keep methane near record highs in 2024.

Astronomers Found a Star That Exploded Twice Before Dying

A rare double explosion in space may rewrite supernova science.

This Enzyme-Infused Concrete Could Turn Buildings into CO2 Sponges

A new study offers a greener path for concrete, the world’s dirtiest building material.

AI Helped Decode a 3,000-Year-Old Babylonian Hymn That Describes a City More Welcoming Than You’d Expect

Rediscovered text reveals daily life and ideals of ancient Babylon.

Peeling Tape Creates Microlightning Strong Enough To Power Chemistry

Microlightning from everyday tape may unlock cleaner ways to drive chemical reactions.

Menstrual Cups Passed a Brutal Space Test. They Could Finally Fix a Major Problem for Many Astronauts

Reusable menstrual cups pass first test in space-like flight conditions.

The Fungus Behind the Pharaoh’s Curse Might Help Cure Leukemia

A deadly fungus found in ancient tombs yields a powerful new anti-leukemia compound.

The Woman of Margaux: Reconstructing the Face and Life of a 10,500-Year-Old Hunter-Gatherer

A new facial reconstruction challenges old ideas about Europe’s ancient inhabitants