homehome Home chatchat Notifications


Camouflage or bright colours: what's better for survival?

The wild is often home to a game of hide or seek, and animals need to be well adapted to their part of the game. For those who are constantly juggling the role of prey, however, the game seems to always favor them less. We, as humans, have little direct contact with these underlying mechanics […]

Tibi Puiu
March 12, 2014 @ 9:13 am

share Share

The wild is often home to a game of hide or seek, and animals need to be well adapted to their part of the game. For those who are constantly juggling the role of prey, however, the game seems to always favor them less. We, as humans, have little direct contact with these underlying mechanics of survival, as we sit comfortably on the crown spot of the food chain. For the millions of species out there fighting for survival this is an entirely different matter, but of course nature has granted each of them with a trait or skill.

A macro shot of a Blue Poison Dart Frog (Dendrobates Azureus). You wouldn't want to eat this fellow, and its bright colours serve as a warning. (c) MSU

A macro shot of a Blue Poison Dart Frog (Dendrobates Azureus). You wouldn’t want to eat this fellow, and its bright colours serve as a warning. (c) MSU

It all boils down to avoid being eaten, and some of the paths evolution has taken involve hiding or poison. Being a poisonous species has its benefits and downfalls; for one the chances of you being eaten plummet as the trait is accompanied by bright colouring (yellow, black, red) which predators have learned to avoid, but secreting poison comes at huge energy expenses, so not a lot of species can afford it. The most beaten path involves hiding through camouflage. Some species however choose to go in between: they flatter they bright, venomous-like colouring out in the open, despite they lack the accompanying poison altogether. Their game is all bluff.

How dangerous is this approach? A team of researchers Michigan State University analyzed how coluor-coded communications evolve and found that this takes place in gradual steps, instead of a sudden leap for garish colouring adoption. This tells us that the route pass the middle ground from simple camouflage to poison mimicker is layered with many perils, which few may undergo.

“In some cases, nonpoisonous prey gave up their protection of camouflage and acquired bright colors,” said Kenna Lehmann, who conducted the research. “How did these imitators get past that tricky middle ground, where they can be easily seen, but they don’t quite resemble colorful toxic prey? And why take the risk?”

 MSU scientists show that nontoxic imposters, like king snakes, benefit from giving off a poisonous persona, even when the signals are not even close.

MSU scientists show that nontoxic imposters, like king snakes, benefit from giving off a poisonous persona, even when the signals are not even close.

Colourful impostors

The higher the risk, the higher the reward it seems. Predators, evolutionary conditioned to stay away from poisonous species, react to the impersonations and avoid eating the imposters. It seems to work. For instance coral snakes are truly toxic animals, while king snakes are not, but the two very much look alike. So, why don’t the imitators develop poison of their own and be done with it? The transition is in itself extremely costly – and developing poison comes at tremendous energy expenditure.

“Leaving the safety of the cryptic, camouflage peak to go through the exposed adaptive valley over many generations is a dangerous journey,” Lehmann explained. “To take the risk of traversing the dangerous middle ground – where they don’t look enough like toxic prey – is too great in many cases. Toxins can be costly to produce. If prey gain protection by colors alone, then it doesn’t make evolutionary sense to expend additional energy developing the poison.”

For the study, the scientists used evolving populations of digital organisms in a virtual world called Avida. Using this model, the researchers looked at how specialized programs compete and reproduce. The software is developed in such a manner that mutations occur when Avida beings reproduce, and thus scientists digital organisms evolve, just like living things.

Findings were reported in the journal PLOS ONE.

share Share

The perfect pub crawl: mathematicians solve most efficient way to visit all 81,998 bars in South Korea

This is the longest pub crawl ever solved by scientists.

This Film Shaped Like Shark Skin Makes Planes More Aerodynamic and Saves Billions in Fuel

Mimicking shark skin may help aviation shed fuel—and carbon

China Just Made the World's Fastest Transistor and It Is Not Made of Silicon

The new transistor runs 40% faster and uses less power.

Ice Age Humans in Ukraine Were Masterful Fire Benders, New Study Shows

Ice Age humans mastered fire with astonishing precision.

The "Bone Collector" Caterpillar Disguises Itself With the Bodies of Its Victims and Lives in Spider Webs

This insect doesn't play with its food. It just wears it.

University of Zurich Researchers Secretly Deployed AI Bots on Reddit in Unauthorized Study

The revelation has sparked outrage across the internet.

Giant Brain Study Took Seven Years to Test the Two Biggest Theories of Consciousness. Here's What Scientists Found

Both came up short but the search for human consciousness continues.

The Cybertruck is all tricks and no truck, a musky Tesla fail

Tesla’s baking sheet on wheels rides fast in the recall lane toward a dead end where dysfunctional men gather.

British archaeologists find ancient coin horde "wrapped like a pasty"

Archaeologists discover 11th-century coin hoard, shedding light on a turbulent era.

Astronauts May Soon Eat Fresh Fish Farmed on the Moon

Scientists hope Lunar Hatch will make fresh fish part of space missions' menus.