homehome Home chatchat Notifications


30 million years ago, a group of monkeys sailed from Africa to South America

It's one of the craziest explorer stories you'll ever read.

Mihai Andrei
October 1, 2020 @ 6:26 pm

share Share

Millions of years before humans were doing any exploring, a group of monkeys made an epic, presumably involuntary journey across the Atlantic.

Researchers have traced this journey using a key fossil find: four teeth uncovered in Peru, belonging to primates that lived only in Africa.

Drying screen-washed sediment near the Santa Rosa fossil site. Image credits: Erik Seiffert.

The banks of Río Yurúa, turned out to be a valuable trove for paleontologists. Here, 32-million-year-old rocks contain a strange mix of things you’d expect and things you wouldn’t. Alongside the remnants of bats, capybaras, and early New World monkeys, researchers also found evidence of a second primate group: a group known as parapithecids, who only lived in Africa.

“This is a completely unique discovery,” said Erik Seiffert, the study’s lead author and Professor of Clinical Integrative Anatomical Sciences at Keck School of Medicine of USC. “It shows that in addition to the New World monkeys and a group of rodents known as caviomorphs—there is this third lineage of mammals that somehow made this very improbable transatlantic journey to get from Africa to South America.”

The study was based on only 4 teeth — but sometimes, that’s all you need to tell a paleontological story. To the untrained eye, these 4 teeth would look similar to those found in the Americas, but to experienced paleontologists, that couldn’t be further from the truth.

“The new molars were almost identical to those of the parapithecid Qatrania, which is known from sites that I worked in the Fayum area of Egypt,” Seiffert also says.

Teeth of the newly discovered Ucayalipithecus primate in Peru resemble those of primates that lived in northern Africa as early as around 56 million years ago. Image credits: Erik Seiffert.

The species is new to science (Seiffert and colleagues named it Ucayalipithecus perdita), but the group to which it belongs is clear — the African group. So how did African primates reach South America?

To answer that question, we need to look at the geology at the time.

“It is likely that the ancestors of this new species arrived via a transatlantic rafting event when sea levels dropped at the Eocene–Oligocene transition ∼32 to 35 million years ago,” the study authors note.

The Eocene-Oligocene transition was actually an extinction event marked by a decrease in sea levels. The glaciers in Antarctica were slowly building up at the time, which caused Africa and South America to be a little closer by land than they are today. The 1,770 miles that separate the two continents now would only have only been about 900-1,300 miles during that geological period.

“We’re suggesting that this group might have made it over to South America right around what we call the Eocene-Oligocene Boundary, a time period between two geological epochs, when the Antarctic ice sheet started to build up and the sea level fell,” said Seiffert. “That might have played a role in making it a bit easier for these primates to actually get across the Atlantic Ocean.”

However, even 900 miles would have been a hell of a passage — so how did they (or their ancestors) do it? As unlikely as it sounds, Seiffert believes they arrived to the Americas on a raft.

It’s not the first time something like this would have happened. The ancestors of Madagascar lemurs, for instance, reached the island by rafting from mainland Africa over more than 260 miles, and small mammals or lizards have been known to raft even longer distances. It’s not intentional (the primates weren’t exactly boldly going where no primates have gone before), but this type of long travel can sometimes happen.

But the bizareness of the situation doesn’t elude Seiffert.

“The thing that strikes me about this study more than any other I’ve been involved in is just how improbable all of it is,” said Seiffert. “The fact that it’s this remote site in the middle of nowhere, that the chances of finding these pieces is extremely small, to the fact that we’re revealing this very improbable journey that was made by these early monkeys, it’s all quite remarkable.”

Journal References:

  • E.R. Seiffert at University of Southern California in Los Angeles, CA el al., “A parapithecid stem anthropoid of African origin in the Paleogene of South America,” Science (2020).
  • M. Godinot at Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes in Paris, France el al., “Rafting on a wide and wild ocean,” Science (2020).

share Share

If You’re Nostalgic for a Place, It’s Probably Somewhere Near Water

There's just something about the sea.

Tuvalu Is on Track to Become the First Country Lost to Climate Change. More Than 80% of the Population Apply to Relocate to Australia Under World's First 'Climate Visa'

Tuvalu will likely become the first nation to vanish because of climate change.

This New Museum Lets You Order and Handle Unique, Ancient Exhibits

From Roman artifacts to Picasso's gowns, this museum lets you hold the past.

This 850,000-Year-Old Toddler’s Bone Is the Oldest Evidence of Cannibalism in Europe

Researchers say it’s the oldest direct evidence of cannibalism in Europe.

Pregnancy in Space Sounds Cool Until You Learn What Could Go Wrong

Growing a baby in space sounds like science fiction. Here’s why it might stay that way.

Nearly Three-Quarters of New Solar and Wind Projects Are Being Built in China

China is driving a global shift in energy with a record-breaking expansion of solar and wind power.

Temporary Tattoo Turns Red If Your Drink Has Been Spiked

This skin-worn patch can detect GHB in drinks in under one second

7,000 Steps a Day Keep the Doctor Away

Just 7,000 steps a day may lower your risk of death, dementia, and depression.

"Extremely rare" bronze armor from Czechia turns out to be a Trojan War era artifact

3,200-year-old warrior armor links Moravia to the world of Homeric myth.

Researchers tore down a Tesla and BYD battery to see which one's better

The two companies have different approaches, but is one better?