homehome Home chatchat Notifications


The 10% of the brain myth

The media seems to be repeating the idea that we use just 10% of our brains and taking it as a given. Scientists have tried for years to change this misconception and they have clearly stated that there is no scientific evidence to suggest that we use only 10% of our brains. In fact it […]

Mihai Andrei
November 7, 2007 @ 8:14 am

share Share

brain

The media seems to be repeating the idea that we use just 10% of our brains and taking it as a given. Scientists have tried for years to change this misconception and they have clearly stated that there is no scientific evidence to suggest that we use only 10% of our brains. In fact it is very hard to say what using just 10% of your brain means. It could mean that you could cut 90% of your brain and be just fine or that you just use only one out of every ten nerve cells is essential or used at any one time.Start with the beginning. This is a myth. It is hard to track down where it started from; it probably originates in the work that Karl Lashley conducted in the 1920s and 1930s when he removed large areas of the cerebral cortex in rats and found that these animals could still relearn specific tasks. But we know for a fact that even a tiny damaged area of the brain could have devastating effects which shows that his work was misunderstood.

Brain scans show that the regions which are activated when we move or think or do any activity are spread in every part of the brain. This goes to show that the brain activity is not limited to 10% of the brain and not even to 10% of the neurons. There may be some areas which have no particular tasks or whose tasks we have not fully understood but they are not inactive. Neurons are permanently stimulated because without stimulation they would just die. So 90% of the neurons would die. But the intriguing thing is that in most cases we are not able to perform a number of activities at the same time.

So the good thing is that without using every neuron we have we can improve our brains because it matters not how many neurons we have but how many connections they have between each other. And note that evolution has never created a species whose organ with the biggest energy consume was 90% useless.


share Share

People in Thailand were chewing psychoactive nuts 4,000 years ago. It's in their teeth

The teeth Chico, they never lie.

We Might Be Ingesting Thousands of Lung-Penetrating Microplastics Daily in Our Homes and Cars — 100x More Than Previously Estimated

Microscopic plastic particles are everywhere and there's more than we thought.

This Scientist Stepped Thousands of Times on Deadly Snakes So You Don't Have To. What He Found Could Save Lives

This scientist is built different.

Scientists Say Junk Food Might Be as Addictive as Drugs

This is especially hurtful for kids.

This 850,000-Year-Old Toddler’s Bone Is the Oldest Evidence of Cannibalism in Europe

Researchers say it’s the oldest direct evidence of cannibalism in Europe.

Tooth nerves aren't just for pain. They also protect your teeth

We should be more thankful for what's in our mouths.

Temporary Tattoo Turns Red If Your Drink Has Been Spiked

This skin-worn patch can detect GHB in drinks in under one second

7,000 Steps a Day Keep the Doctor Away

Just 7,000 steps a day may lower your risk of death, dementia, and depression.

Amish Kids Almost Never Get Allergies and Scientists Finally Know Why

How Amish barns could hold the secret to preventing the onset of allergies.

Surgeons Found a Way to Resuscitate Dead Hearts and It Already Saved A Baby's Life

Can we reboot the human heart? Yes, we can, and this could save many dying babies and adults who are waiting for a transplant.