homehome Home chatchat Notifications


Humans think more rationally in a foreign language, study finds

“Would you make the same decisions in a foreign language as you would in your native tongue?” asks Boaz Keysar, a psychologist at the University of Chicago, who recently published a study that discusses this highly interesting question. The scientists involved in the study found that, indeed, counter to popular belief thinking in a foreign […]

Tibi Puiu
April 25, 2012 @ 6:11 pm

share Share

“Would you make the same decisions in a foreign language as you would in your native tongue?” asks Boaz Keysar, a psychologist at the University of Chicago, who recently published a study that discusses this highly interesting question. The scientists involved in the study found that, indeed, counter to popular belief thinking in a foreign language makes take you more rational decisions.

“It may be intuitive that people would make the same choices regardless of the language they are using, or that the difficulty of using a foreign language would make decisions less systematic. We discovered, however, that the opposite is true: Using a foreign language reduces decision-making biases,” wrote Keysar’s team.

foreign language To test this hypothesis, the researchers severed a series of tests to students based on the work of the eminent psychologist Daniel Kahneman, Nobel Prize laureate in 2002 for his work on prospect theory. Kahneman’s theory describes how people perceive risks and how this affects their decision-making abilities – according to his findings, humans inherently chose the safe decision when faced with gain, and take the risky decision when faced with loss.

With this in mind, the psychologists devised several experiments. For the first, they asked 121 American students who were studying Japanese to make a hypothetical choice – to fight a disease threatening the lives of 600,000 people, doctors could make a cure that would surely work for only 200,000, or a medicine that would have a 33,33% chance of curing all 600,000 and a 66,66% of not saving a single life.

When prompted to answer when the question when it was framed as “saving lives”, 80% of the students chose the safe option. When it was framed as “losing lives”, only 47% of the students chose the safe option. However, when asked in Japanese, the students chose the safe option in 40% proportion, no matter how the question was phrased. “Using a foreign language diminishes the framing effect,” wrote Keysar’s team.

A similar experiment was carried out in the company of South Korean students studying English, and English native speakers studying French. They were presented with a low-loss, high-gain betting game  – each student was offered a number of one-dollar bills to bet on a coin toss. If they lost the bet, they’d lose the 1$ bill, however if they won they would re-gain the dollar bill, plus another 1.5$. In the long run, choosing to place multiple bets would be profitable, however only  just 54 percent of students took the bets when the proceedings were made in the native-speaking language. When the proceedings were made in non-native speaking language, 71% of the students took the leap.

“They take more bets in a foreign language because they expect to gain in the long run, and are less affected by the typically exaggerated aversion to losses,” wrote Keysar and colleagues.

What the researchers conclude is that instinctive decision-making, made with the thought in a native language, is less rational and more emotionally based than those made in a second language.

“Given that more and more people use a foreign language on a daily basis, our discovery could have far-reaching implications,” they wrote, suggesting that people who speak a second language might use it when considering financial decisions. “Over a long time horizon, this might very well be beneficial.”

source: wired

The findings were reported in the journal Psychology Science.

share Share

Goodness, Gracious: New Study Finds Moral People Are Happier

Researchers uncover a link between moral character and long-term well-being.

Vegetarians Are More Rebellious (and Power Hungry) Than You Think

Forget the stereotype. Vegetarianism is becoming a cultural statement.

Psychologist Says Hitler, Putin and Trump Share One Startling Childhood Pattern

Unresolved trauma in childhood may feed a dangerous form of political narcissism.

How many people are actually exceptional? Less than 1 in 100,000

We all like to think we're exceptional. But statistically, you're probably not; and neither is anyone you know.

Why Reading Obituaries Every Weekend Turned Me Into a Creative Idea Machine

Reading obituaries can boost creativity by exposing you to distant ideas, fueling the associations that lead to unexpected breakthroughs.

Your smartphone is a parasite, according to evolution

Many of us are hostage to our phones – and it’s not unlike having head lice.

Why Some People Never Get Lost — and Others Always Do

It’s not really in your genes that much. It’s how you live, explore, and pay attention.

Just five minutes of junk food advertising are enough to get kids eating more calories

Junk food ads math: 5 minutes equals 130 more kilocalories per day.

What Your Emoji Use Really Says About You, According to Science

If you use a lot of emojis, you'll want to read this.

Scientists Tracked Countless Outcomes of Spanking Children and Found Zero Benefits. On the Contrary, There Is Only Harm

Even in countries where it’s culturally acceptable, physical punishment leads to negative outcomes.