homehome Home chatchat Notifications


Has our sense of morality evolved from disgust?

Our sense of morality has always been considered that something that separates us from the rest of the animal kingdom, making us superior through its complexity. But, like always, scientist come to tell us that we may not be in fact really that special and that our perception of what is moral and what is […]

Mara Bujor
March 4, 2009 @ 11:51 am

share Share

Our sense of morality has always been considered that something that separates us from the rest of the animal kingdom, making us superior through its complexity. But, like always, scientist come to tell us that we may not be in fact really that special and that our perception of what is moral and what is immoral may be strongly related to something as simple and primitive as our sense of disgust. So does immorality literally make us sick?
Our sense of disgust evolved as a necessity in order to avoid germs and disease, but lead author Hanah Chapman claims that studies have shown that is also involved in moral judgment, being as important as more complex processes of thought.
The study involved the examination of facial movements when the participants were asked to taste unpleasant liquids, watch photos depicting dirty toilets or wounds and then take part in a laboratory game, in which they were treated unfair. The results showed that seeing unpleasant photos or tasting disgusting liquids led to the same reactions as being subjected to unfair treatment.
Electromyography, which is a technique that uses small electrodes placed on the face in order to detect electrical activation when muscles contract was used especially to monitor the movement of the levator labii muscle, which raises the upper lip and makes the nose wrinkle,these are considered to be the main facial expressions of disgust. Te muscle contracted in all three cases.
This proves that our sense of morality may depend on instinct as much as on thought, possibly developing from an inborn’s preference for what tastes good, thus avoiding poisoning.
This discovery sheds new light on the origins of our distinction between what is good and wrong as it shows that we may rely more on instinct than we have previously thought.
Source: University of Toronto

share Share

China Now Uses 80% Artificial Sand. Here's Why That's A Bigger Deal Than It Sounds

No need to disturb water bodies for sand. We can manufacture it using rocks or mining waste — China is already doing it.

New research shows how Trump uses "strategic victimhood" to justify his politics

How victimhood rhetoric helped Donald Trump justify a sweeping global trade war

Long Before the Egyptians, The World's Oldest Mummies Were Smoked, Not Dried in the Desert

The 14,000-year-old smoked mummies in Southeast Asia are rewriting burial history

NASA Found Signs That Dwarf Planet Ceres May Have Once Supported Life

In its youth, the dwarf planet Ceres may have brewed a chemical banquet beneath its icy crust.

We can still easily get AI to say all sorts of dangerous things

Jailbreaking an AI is still an easy task.

A small, portable test could revolutionize how we diagnose Alzheimer's

A passive EEG scan could spot memory loss before symptoms begin to show.

Scientists Solved a Key Mystery Regarding the Evolution of Life on Earth

A new study brings scientists closer to uncovering how life began on Earth.

Stone Age Atlantis: 8,500-Year-Old Settlements Discovered Beneath Danish Seas

Archaeologists took a deep dive into the Bay of Aarhus to trace how Stone Age people adapted to rising waters.

Humans made wild animals smaller and domestic animals bigger. But not all of them

Why are goats and sheep so different?

Could AI and venom help us fight antibiotic resistance?

Scientists used AI to mine animal venom for potent new antibiotics.