homehome Home chatchat Notifications


Faster than light neutrinos ? Not so fast, says another study

An international team of researchers working in Italy recently conducted a study which concluded that the revolutionary results claimed by their colleagues at CERN may be faulty. They studied the same neutrino particles reported to travel faster than light and claim their test clearly shows this is wrong. The announcement was made in September, and […]

Mihai Andrei
November 21, 2011 @ 1:36 pm

share Share

An international team of researchers working in Italy recently conducted a study which concluded that the revolutionary results claimed by their colleagues at CERN may be faulty. They studied the same neutrino particles reported to travel faster than light and claim their test clearly shows this is wrong.

The announcement was made in September, and since then, it pretty much set the world of physics ablaze; after all, for a particle to travel faster than light, it would have to mean that we’ve been looking at physics wrong this whole time, and relativity is based on an incorrect premise.

In the supposedly ground breaking experiments, members from the OPERA experiment at the Gran Sasso laboratory south of Rome claim they noticed neutrinos arrive some 60 nanoseconds earlier than light, but ICARUS, another experiment at Gran Sasso, deeper underground and run by Italy’s National Institute of Physics argue that their measurements contradict these readings.

They explain, on the basis of two recently published US studies, that if the neutrinos would have gone even a fraction faster than the speed of light, then they would have lost a significant part of their energy. Physicist Tomasso Dorigo, who works at CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, and the U.S. Fermilab near Chicago said that according to him this paper was ‘simple and definitive’.

According to Einstein’s theory of special relativity, absolutely nothing can travel faster than light, and that idea is at the core of modern physics, regardless of field or application. After the people at CERN announced this revolutionary observation, the world of science has absolutely gone mad over this, and many have tried to back up Einstein’s theory; for now, even though it’s still in the fog, it seems like it will still stand.

Via Reuters

share Share

Why Blue Eyes Aren’t Really Blue: The Surprising Reason Blue Eyes Are Actually an Optical Illusion

What if the piercing blue of someone’s eyes isn’t color at all, but a trick of light?

The Moon Used to Be Much Closer to Earth. It's Drifting 1.5 Inches Farther From Earth Every Year and It's Slowly Making Our Days Longer

The Moon influences ocean tides – and ocean tides, in some ways, influence the Moon back.

Scientists Found That Bending Ice Makes Electricity and It May Explain Lightning

Ice isn't as passive as it looks.

We can still easily get AI to say all sorts of dangerous things

Jailbreaking an AI is still an easy task.

A small, portable test could revolutionize how we diagnose Alzheimer's

A passive EEG scan could spot memory loss before symptoms begin to show.

Scientists Solved a Key Mystery Regarding the Evolution of Life on Earth

A new study brings scientists closer to uncovering how life began on Earth.

Scientists Finally Prove Dust Helps Clouds Freeze and It Could Change Climate Models

New analysis links desert dust to cloud freezing, with big implications for weather and climate models.

Humans made wild animals smaller and domestic animals bigger. But not all of them

Why are goats and sheep so different?

Could AI and venom help us fight antibiotic resistance?

Scientists used AI to mine animal venom for potent new antibiotics.

They're 80,000 Years Old and No One Knows Who Made Them. Are These the World's Oldest Arrowheads?

Stone tips found in Uzbekistan could rewrite the history of bows and arrows.