homehome Home chatchat Notifications


New simple genetic test could distinguish between viral and bacterial infections

It may not seem like much, but by differentiating between bacterial and viral fevers, this new test could help doctors decide whether or not to prescribe antibiotics. Fevers are a common symptom in many infectious diseases, but it’s often difficult to know if the cause is bacterial or viral, and thus, antibiotics are often needlessly […]

Mihai Andrei
July 17, 2013 @ 4:32 am

share Share

It may not seem like much, but by differentiating between bacterial and viral fevers, this new test could help doctors decide whether or not to prescribe antibiotics.

virus bacteria

Fevers are a common symptom in many infectious diseases, but it’s often difficult to know if the cause is bacterial or viral, and thus, antibiotics are often needlessly prescribed, something which in the long run does a great harm to humanity, because more often than not, some germs survive the treatment, and they are “trained” to resist antibiotics. Some have classified drug-resistant germs as dangerous as terrorism.

However, by measuring the gene activity in the blood of 22 sick children, Gregory Storch, a pediatrician and infectious disease researcher at Washington University in St. Louis was able to distinguish between fevers caused by bacteria and viruses. He and his team found that even though the activity of hundreds of genes was affected by the fever as the immune system tried to cope with the threat, gauging the response of just 18 genes could correctly distinguish between viral and bacterial infections 90 percent of the time.

The research is a step toward improving diagnosis. In the future, being able to quickly determine the cause of fevers should help prevent unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions – antibiotics kill bacteria, but are pretty much useless against viruses.

Scientific reference: X. Hu et al. Gene expression profiles in febrile children with defined viral and bacterial infection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences published online July 15, 2013. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1302968110

share Share

This New Coating Repels Oil Like Teflon Without the Nasty PFAs

An ultra-thin coating mimics Teflon’s performance—minus most of its toxicity.

People in Thailand were chewing psychoactive nuts 4,000 years ago. It's in their teeth

The teeth Chico, they never lie.

We Might Be Ingesting Thousands of Lung-Penetrating Microplastics Daily in Our Homes and Cars — 100x More Than Previously Estimated

Microscopic plastic particles are everywhere and there's more than we thought.

This Scientist Stepped Thousands of Times on Deadly Snakes So You Don't Have To. What He Found Could Save Lives

This scientist is built different.

Scientists Say Junk Food Might Be as Addictive as Drugs

This is especially hurtful for kids.

Tooth nerves aren't just for pain. They also protect your teeth

We should be more thankful for what's in our mouths.

Temporary Tattoo Turns Red If Your Drink Has Been Spiked

This skin-worn patch can detect GHB in drinks in under one second

7,000 Steps a Day Keep the Doctor Away

Just 7,000 steps a day may lower your risk of death, dementia, and depression.

Amish Kids Almost Never Get Allergies and Scientists Finally Know Why

How Amish barns could hold the secret to preventing the onset of allergies.

Surgeons Found a Way to Resuscitate Dead Hearts and It Already Saved A Baby's Life

Can we reboot the human heart? Yes, we can, and this could save many dying babies and adults who are waiting for a transplant.