homehome Home chatchat Notifications


New simple genetic test could distinguish between viral and bacterial infections

It may not seem like much, but by differentiating between bacterial and viral fevers, this new test could help doctors decide whether or not to prescribe antibiotics. Fevers are a common symptom in many infectious diseases, but it’s often difficult to know if the cause is bacterial or viral, and thus, antibiotics are often needlessly […]

Mihai Andrei
July 17, 2013 @ 4:32 am

share Share

It may not seem like much, but by differentiating between bacterial and viral fevers, this new test could help doctors decide whether or not to prescribe antibiotics.

virus bacteria

Fevers are a common symptom in many infectious diseases, but it’s often difficult to know if the cause is bacterial or viral, and thus, antibiotics are often needlessly prescribed, something which in the long run does a great harm to humanity, because more often than not, some germs survive the treatment, and they are “trained” to resist antibiotics. Some have classified drug-resistant germs as dangerous as terrorism.

However, by measuring the gene activity in the blood of 22 sick children, Gregory Storch, a pediatrician and infectious disease researcher at Washington University in St. Louis was able to distinguish between fevers caused by bacteria and viruses. He and his team found that even though the activity of hundreds of genes was affected by the fever as the immune system tried to cope with the threat, gauging the response of just 18 genes could correctly distinguish between viral and bacterial infections 90 percent of the time.

The research is a step toward improving diagnosis. In the future, being able to quickly determine the cause of fevers should help prevent unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions – antibiotics kill bacteria, but are pretty much useless against viruses.

Scientific reference: X. Hu et al. Gene expression profiles in febrile children with defined viral and bacterial infection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences published online July 15, 2013. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1302968110

share Share

This new blood test could find cancerous tumors three years before any symptoms

Imagine catching cancer before symptoms even appear. New research shows we’re closer than ever.

CAR T Breakthrough Therapy Doubles Survival Time for Deadly Stomach Cancer

Scientists finally figured out a way to take CAR-T cell therapy beyond blood.

A Man Lost His Voice to ALS. A Brain Implant Helped Him Sing Again

It's a stunning breakthrough for neuroprosthetics

In the UK, robotic surgery will become the default for small surgeries

In a decade, the country expects 90% of all keyhole surgeries to include robots.

Bioengineered tooth "grows" in the gum and fuses with existing nerves to mimic the real thing

Implants have come a long way. But we can do even better.

Science Just Debunked the 'Guns Don’t Kill People' Argument Again. This Time, It's Kids

Guns are the leading cause of death of kids and teens.

A Chemical Found in Acne Medication Might Help Humans Regrow Limbs Like Salamanders

The amphibian blueprint for regeneration may already be written in our own DNA.

Scientists Created an STD Fungus That Kills Malaria-Carrying Mosquitoes After Sex

Researchers engineer a fungus that kills mosquitoes during mating, halting malaria in its tracks

Drinking Sugar May Be Far Worse for You Than Eating It, Scientists Say

Liquid sugars like soda and juice sharply raise diabetes risk — solid sugars don't.

Muscle bros love their cold plunges. Science says they don't really work (for gains)

The cold plunge may not be helping those gains you work so hard for.