You’ve heard it a thousand times: sugar is terrible for your teeth. It really is. But are artificial sweeteners actually any better?

The short answer? Yes—artificial sweeteners don’t feed the bacteria that cause cavities. But here’s the twist: many of the sugar-free products they’re used in can still damage your teeth in a different way—through acid erosion.

Let’s break it down.

Sugar’s Sticky Legacy: Why It Wrecks Your Teeth

Sugar is more than just empty calories—it’s the favorite fuel of harmful mouth bacteria like Streptococcus mutans. These bacteria feast on sugars and produce acid as waste. That acid eats away at your enamel (the hard outer coating of your teeth). When this happens on and on, it leads to dental caries, what you know as cavities.

It gets even worse. Sugar doesn’t just encourage acid production. It helps bacteria build thick, sticky biofilms (plaque) that cling stubbornly to your teeth, making it harder for saliva or brushing to wash them away.

That’s why dental experts and public health organizations—from the World Health Organization (WHO) to the American Dental Association (ADA)—consistently warn against high sugar consumption.

But if sugar is the villain, does that make artificial sweeteners the heroes?

Sugar Substitutes: Artificial, Natural, and In-Between

Artificial sweeteners, also known as non-nutritive sweeteners, fall into three major categories:

• High-Intensity Artificial Sweeteners like aspartame (Equal), sucralose (Splenda), and saccharin (Sweet’N Low). These are hundreds to thousands of times sweeter than sugar but contain virtually no calories.
• Sugar Alcohols (Polyols) like xylitol, erythritol, and sorbitol. These resemble sugar in structure and sweetness but are not fully absorbed by the body.
• Novel or Natural-Derived Sweeteners like stevia and monk fruit extract. These originate from plants but are often refined in labs.

All of these sweeteners share this dental trait: they don’t fuel the bacteria that cause cavities. If you take a look at your teeth before and after you swap sugar for artificial sweeteners, there’s a good chance you’ll see a difference

Unlike sugar, most artificial sweeteners can’t be fermented by mouth bacteria. That means they don’t produce acid and don’t lower the pH of your dental plaque to cavity-forming levels.

Take xylitol, for example. Not only is it non-cariogenic (non-cavity-causing), but it may actively fight cavities. S. mutans tries to consume xylitol but ends up wasting energy in a so-called “futile cycle,” stalling its own growth. Xylitol also boosts saliva flow—another line of defense against enamel damage.

Erythritol, a rising substitute among sugar alcohols, may go even further. Early studies suggest it might reshape the oral microbiome by discouraging harmful bacteria and supporting friendlier strains.

Even high-intensity sweeteners like sucralose and aspartame have shown promise in lab tests, with some evidence suggesting they may hinder bacteria associated with gum disease, such as Porphyromonas gingivalis.

So should you switch all your sweets to xylitol or sucralose?

Not So Fast

Here’s the catch: while the sweeteners themselves may be tooth-friendly, the products they’re used in often are not.

Think of diet sodas, energy drinks, or sour sugar-free candies. These items are frequently loaded with acids like citric, phosphoric, or malic acid—not for sweetness, but for flavor, fizz, and shelf life. These acids can chemically erode tooth enamel, even without any bacteria involved.

This process, called dental erosion, is silent but destructive. Once enamel is worn away, it doesn’t grow back. That’s why a seemingly “safe” sugar-free lemon candy or cola can still do serious damage to your smile.

In fact, studies show diet sodas can be just as erosive—or more so—than their sugary counterparts. For instance, one study found that Diet Coke, despite lacking sugar, caused more enamel softening than regular Coke due to its mix of phosphoric and citric acids.

Moral of the story? “Sugar-free” is not the same as “tooth-safe.”

What the Experts Are Saying

We’ve scoured the web and several high-profile studies to try and draw some conclusions. Most dental and health agencies agree:

• Artificial sweeteners are non-cariogenic. That means they don’t directly cause cavities.
• Chewing sugar-free gum with xylitol or sorbitol can be beneficial by increasing saliva flow.
• Acid exposure from drinks and candies—sweetened or not—is a major threat.
• Xylitol shows promise, but more long-term studies are needed for official endorsements.

The FDA and European Food Safety Authority have declared approved sweeteners safe within daily intake limits. The WHO, however, has warned against long-term reliance on non-sugar sweeteners for weight loss, though this doesn’t directly relate to dental health.

Bottom line? Sweeteners can help reduce sugar intake, but they’re not magic bullets.

Artificial sweeteners are a major upgrade from sugar when it comes to cavity prevention. They deprive harmful bacteria of food, and some may even help balance your oral ecosystem.

But the story doesn’t end there. If those sweeteners come packaged with acid-heavy additives, like in diet sodas or sour candies, you’re simply trading one dental danger for another.

So, yes—artificial sweeteners are better for your teeth than sugar. But “better” doesn’t mean “perfect.” Think of them as a tool, not a ticket to eat and drink freely without consequences.