homehome Home chatchat Notifications


Cloning a mammoth ? Not so fast!

In a recent post I was telling you about Russian and Japanese researchers working together with the purpose of cloning a mammoth from bone marrow DNA recently found in Siberia. However, many researchers are extremely skeptical about this, including some of the world’s leading experts. “C’mon, it’ll never happen. Not in my lifetime,” said Webb […]

Mihai Andrei
December 7, 2011 @ 1:55 pm

share Share

In a recent post I was telling you about Russian and Japanese researchers working together with the purpose of cloning a mammoth from bone marrow DNA recently found in Siberia. However, many researchers are extremely skeptical about this, including some of the world’s leading experts.

“C’mon, it’ll never happen. Not in my lifetime,” said Webb Miller, a Penn State computer scientist and genomicist who helped decipher the genetic code of a woolly mammoth.

Japanese and Russian scientists have been trying for a long time to find the key to cloning mammoths, and they recently declared they found a suitable candidate in the Siberian permafrost. Their plan is to take the nuclei of bone marrow cells, transplant them into egg cells extracted from elephants and then implant the cloned embryos into a surrogate elephant mother. Their news report claims “there is a high likelihood” that biologically active nuclei can be extracted from the frozen marrow. But Miller doesn’t believe that.

“DNA from a woolly mammoth is a mess,” he explained. “It’s fractured into very short pieces, and there’s a lot of postmortem DNA damage other than just breakage. The code gets damaged a lot.”

Even if they manage to go through with the procedure, the odds for cloned animals aren’t really that good – especially with extinct or near extinction species. There is no official number, but there are way, way more failures than successes. However, Miller says there is much value in studying and understanding extinct DNA, even without a ‘resurrection’.

“I’m looking out my window, and 13,000 years ago, there were some really interesting animals out there,” he mused. “They’re gone now, and I’d like to know why. … Understanding which species survived and which ones didn’t, looking at their genome and trying to figure that out, that’s interesting to me.”

share Share

Why Do Some Birds Sing More at Dawn? It's More About Social Behavior Than The Environment

Study suggests birdsong patterns are driven more by social needs than acoustics.

This Self-Assembling Living Worm Tower Might Be the Most Bizarre Escape Machine

The worm tower behaves like a superorganism.

Dehorning Rhinos Looks Brutal But It’s Slashing Poaching Rates by 78 Percent

Removing rhino horns drastically cuts poaching, new study reveals.

Fish Feel Intense Pain For 20 Minutes After Catch — So Why Are We Letting Them Suffocate?

Brutal and mostly invisible, the way we kill fish involves prolonged suffering.

Scientists stunned to observe that humpback whales might be trying to talk to us

These whales used bubble rings to seemingly send messages to humans.

This Wildcat Helped Create the House Cat and Is Now at Risk Because of It

The house cat's ancestor is in trouble.

Revolutionary single-dose cholesterol treatment could reduce levels by up to 69%

If confirmed, this could be useful for billilons of people.

Iron Deficiency Can Flip The Genetic Switch That Determines Sex, Turning Male Embryos into Female

Researchers show maternal iron levels can override genetic sex determination in mice.

Your Cat Can Smell the Difference Between You and a Stranger and They Prefer the Stranger

Cats know who you are and they're probably judging you.

Frog Saunas Offer a Steamy Lifeline Against a Deadly Amphibian Pandemic

For some frog species, sitting in a hot brick could mean the difference between life and death.