homehome Home chatchat Notifications


Popular blood pressure app not accurate, research finds

Researchers found that the app misses high blood pressure in 8 out of 10 cases, giving patients a false sense of security.

Mihai Andrei
March 3, 2016 @ 2:43 pm

share Share

The Instant Blood Pressure (IBP) app claims to accurately monitor blood pressure with only a smartphone and no other hardware, but a new study found that this isn’t really the case. Researchers found that the app misses high blood pressure in 8 out of 10 cases, giving patients a false sense of security.

Smartphone app fails to accurately identify high blood pressure. Photo by Thomas Nilsson.

Timothy B. Plante, M.D., of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, and coauthors looked at the accuracy and precision of IBP. The app works simply by placing a cellphone on the chest with a finger. It seemed to be quite an intriguing new way of measuring blood pressure, and not one that was rigorously tested, at least not in a scientific way. Plante and Seth Martin, M.D., M.H.S., an assistant professor in the Division of Cardiology at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine wanted to see just how accurate IBP is.

“We were skeptical that even very talented people could design an app that could accurately measure blood pressure in such a different way,” Martin says. “Because of the absence of any rigorous scientific testing, there was no evidence that it worked or didn’t work.”

The results were overwhelmingly inaccurate. Close to 80 percent of those with clinically high blood pressure showed normal blood pressure on the app. That’s much worse than even just random guesses, and it could be a big problem. IBP has been downloaded by over 100,000 people which could be misled to believe that they blood pressure is normal, when in fact it isn’t.

“Because this app does such a terrible job measuring blood pressure,” says Plante, “it could lead to irreparable harm by masking the true risk of heart attacks and strokes in people who rely on the accuracy of this information.”

Smartphone apps are become more and more popular, but they are in no way a reliable replacement for proper medical information. The technology could provide valuable, personalized information, but it has to use a scientific approach.

“We think there is definitely a role for smartphone technology in health care, but because of the significant risk of harm to users who get inaccurate information, the results of our study speak to the need for scientific validation and regulation of these apps before they reach consumers,” says Timothy B. Plante, M.D., a fellow in the Division of General Internal Medicine at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

The app has been discontinued in 2015 for unclear reasons, but since it has been so heavily downloaded, many people could still be at risk.

share Share

This new blood test could find cancerous tumors three years before any symptoms

Imagine catching cancer before symptoms even appear. New research shows we’re closer than ever.

CAR T Breakthrough Therapy Doubles Survival Time for Deadly Stomach Cancer

Scientists finally figured out a way to take CAR-T cell therapy beyond blood.

A Man Lost His Voice to ALS. A Brain Implant Helped Him Sing Again

It's a stunning breakthrough for neuroprosthetics

In the UK, robotic surgery will become the default for small surgeries

In a decade, the country expects 90% of all keyhole surgeries to include robots.

Bioengineered tooth "grows" in the gum and fuses with existing nerves to mimic the real thing

Implants have come a long way. But we can do even better.

Science Just Debunked the 'Guns Don’t Kill People' Argument Again. This Time, It's Kids

Guns are the leading cause of death of kids and teens.

Big Tech Said It Was Impossible to Create an AI Based on Ethically Sourced Data. These Researchers Proved Them Wrong

A massive AI breakthrough built entirely on public domain and open-licensed data

A Chemical Found in Acne Medication Might Help Humans Regrow Limbs Like Salamanders

The amphibian blueprint for regeneration may already be written in our own DNA.

Drinking Sugar May Be Far Worse for You Than Eating It, Scientists Say

Liquid sugars like soda and juice sharply raise diabetes risk — solid sugars don't.

Lawyers are already citing fake, AI-generated cases and it's becoming a problem

Just in case you're wondering how society is dealing with AI.