homehome Home chatchat Notifications


Science Museums asked to break ties with Koch Brothers

A group of leading scientists and non-profit organizations are urging museums of science and natural history to break their ties with the Koch brothers, climate-change deniers and industrialists. The two brothers of Koch Industries, the second largest privately-held company in the US, are funding misinformation campaigns regarding global warming and humanity’s impact on the planetary […]

Mihai Andrei
March 24, 2015 @ 9:25 am

share Share

A group of leading scientists and non-profit organizations are urging museums of science and natural history to break their ties with the Koch brothers, climate-change deniers and industrialists. The two brothers of Koch Industries, the second largest privately-held company in the US, are funding misinformation campaigns regarding global warming and humanity’s impact on the planetary climate.

Koch Industries are among the main supporters of climate-change deniers. Image via Huff Post.

“When some of the biggest contributors to climate change and funders of misinformation on climate science sponsor exhibitions in museums of science and natural history, they undermine public confidence in the validity of the institutions responsible for transmitting scientific knowledge,” the letter states. “This corporate philanthropy comes at too high a cost.”

The letter doesn’t name any companies nor the Koch brothers in particular, but it does single out David H. Koch, who sits on the boards of the American Museum of Natural History in New York and the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History and has given contributions of millions of dollars to those institutions.

But science isn’t the only thing he’s been investing in. The Koch brothers have put money into attempting to prove the climate change isn’t happening (or rather, to make it seem like it isn’t happening). In 2011, one of these studies they funded backfired as the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature team found a significant increase in global temperatures associated with human activity. They also wanted to change the school books in Texas to say that we don’t know what’s causing climate change, despite a basic scientific consensus on the issue (1, 2).

David and his brother Charles have also emerged as the nation’s top donors to a vast array of libertarian-conservative politicians and causes, supporting and basically sustaining a number of right wing think tanks such as the Heartland Institute, which likened climate scientists to criminals and terrorists. While many museums in the world are in dire need of funding at the moment, accepting money from groups such as the Koch brothers does seem to come at a too high cost.

“It is one thing for David Koch to give money to Lincoln Center or Carnegie Hall, but it is quite another to support a science/natural history museum that has a role to play in doing research on, and helping educate the public about, climate change, the greatest threat ever to confront humanity,” Nobel laureate Eric Chivian, a signer of the letter, said in a statement. “The philanthropy serves to silence any criticism of the practices of the donor, and even, any critical discussion of the issue.”

Forbes estimated in late 2014 that Charles and David Koch are the 6th and 7th richest people in the US, worth just over $40 billion each. Their agenda has become clearer and clearer in recent years, and their voice has become more and more powerful, especially with millions and tens of millions of dollars spent in philanthropy. But even as David Koch, who was diagnosed with cancer in the 1990s, invested $66.7 million in the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City and $100 million to the New York-Presbyterian Hospital to help build the David H. Koch Center, he and his company fought hard against the regulation of formaldehyde, a well known human carcinogen.

It’s a tough decision for museums to make. Do you take the “dirty money” and accept funding from the same sources groups like the Heartland Institute do, or do you maintain your integrity but miss out on tens of millions? This group of researchers urgest for the latter.

“Drawing on both our scientific expertise and personal care for our planet and people, we believe that the only ethical way forward for our museums is to cut all ties with the fossil fuel industry and funders of climate science obfuscation”, the letter reads at its end.

Read the full letter here.

 

share Share

Archaeologists May Have Found Odysseus’ Sanctuary on Ithaca

A new discovery ties myth to place, revealing centuries of cult worship and civic ritual.

The World’s Largest Sand Battery Just Went Online in Finland. It could change renewable energy

This sand battery system can store 1,000 megawatt-hours of heat for weeks at a time.

A Hidden Staircase in a French Church Just Led Archaeologists Into the Middle Ages

They pulled up a church floor and found a staircase that led to 1500 years of history.

The World’s Largest Camera Is About to Change Astronomy Forever

A new telescope camera promises a 10-year, 3.2-billion-pixel journey through the southern sky.

AI 'Reanimated' a Murder Victim Back to Life to Speak in Court (And Raises Ethical Quandaries)

AI avatars of dead people are teaching courses and testifying in court. Even with the best of intentions, the emerging practice of AI ‘reanimations’ is an ethical quagmire.

This Rare Viking Burial of a Woman and Her Dog Shows That Grief and Love Haven’t Changed in a Thousand Years

The power of loyalty, in this life and the next.

This EV Battery Charges in 18 Seconds and It’s Already Street Legal

RML’s VarEVolt battery is blazing a trail for ultra-fast EV charging and hypercar performance.

DARPA Just Beamed Power Over 5 Miles Using Lasers and Used It To Make Popcorn

A record-breaking laser beam could redefine how we send power to the world's hardest places.

Why Do Some Birds Sing More at Dawn? It's More About Social Behavior Than The Environment

Study suggests birdsong patterns are driven more by social needs than acoustics.

Nonproducing Oil Wells May Be Emitting 7 Times More Methane Than We Thought

A study measured methane flow from more than 450 nonproducing wells across Canada, but thousands more remain unevaluated.