homehome Home chatchat Notifications


Do the math on PV efficiency

I recently came across a great article discussing solar photovoltaic (PV) efficiency. You can read it in its entirety on this website – here’s the gist. When people hear that the typical efficiency for solar power is somewhere around 15%, or even as low as 12% for organic photvoltaics, they scoff and start to mumble that […]

Mihai Andrei
January 22, 2013 @ 4:09 am

share Share

I recently came across a great article discussing solar photovoltaic (PV) efficiency. You can read it in its entirety on this website – here’s the gist.

panels When people hear that the typical efficiency for solar power is somewhere around 15%, or even as low as 12% for organic photvoltaics, they scoff and start to mumble that this is much to low to be efficient. Usually, most people justs say that they’ll wait until the numbers start to go up – but this is a trap; why?

Well, you’ve probably heard of over 40% efficiency in lab tests and space travel, and therefore you think that 15% is just too low to even consider. But perhaps you drive a car; just a typical, average, car. The efficiency is around 15–25%, for a finite resource that pollutes. Should we wait for better?

Maybe you don’t know, but in some ways, you’re similar to a car – you get your energy from fuel too, except your fuel is called food; and guess what? your body’s efficience is about as good as a car’s. Are you a fan of biofuels? Ow man, you really shouldn’t! By now, we already know that there’s many messed up things with biofuels, and traditional ones only go up to 2% efficiency! The much praise algae fuel goes up to 6%. Even photosynthesis, nature’s way of using the solar energy only goes for 6% – so it’s quite remarkable that in a few decades, we managed to outperform nature by a factor of almost 3!

Ok, what the article I told you about doesn’t discuss one thing – it takes a lot to produce efficient solar panels. The high purity silicon and indium are valuable resources, and they’re not that cheap. However, the alternatives also take valuable resources to build – and we’re talking about a ubiquitous renewable energy source.

Hare, tortoise and eco efficiency

But if you really want to wait for the next big thing what’s great, and I mean great as in the next big thing – are organic photovoltaics. They have slightly lower efficiency at about 12%, but they’re much more eco friendly, and while expensive at the moment, will go to reasonable prices in just a few years

share Share

This New Coating Repels Oil Like Teflon Without the Nasty PFAs

An ultra-thin coating mimics Teflon’s performance—minus most of its toxicity.

To Fight Invasive Pythons in the Everglades Scientists Turned to Robot Rabbits

Scientists are unleashing robo-rabbits to trick and trap giant invasive snakes

The AI Boom Is Thirsty for Water — And Communities Are Paying the Price

What if the future of artificial intelligence depends on your town running out of water?

What If We Built Our Skyscrapers from Wood? It's Just Crazy Enough to Work (And Good for the Planet)

Forget concrete and steel. The real future is wood.

Nearly Three-Quarters of New Solar and Wind Projects Are Being Built in China

China is driving a global shift in energy with a record-breaking expansion of solar and wind power.

Over 90% of global renewable power projects are now cheaper than fossil fuels

Solar is 40% cheaper, and onshore wind is under half the price.

Melting Glaciers May Unleash Hundreds of Dormant Volcanoes and Scientists Are Worried

Glacier retreat is triggering more explosive eruptions, with global consequences

For the first time in history, solar was Europe's top source of electricity

Europe is quietly becoming a solar powerhouse.

Glass bottles shed up to 50 times more microplastics into drinks than plastic or cans -- and the paint on the cap may be to blame

Glass bottles may surprisingly release more plastic particles than plastic ones.

A Massive Study Just Proved Plastic Bag Bans Actually Work

Reductions in shoreline litter offer rare good news.