homehome Home chatchat Notifications


Scientists call for end of deep water fishing

In recent years, fishing is going out of control, and deep water fishing especially has to stop, because it depleted fish stocks that take longer to recover than other species. This is exactly the conclusion of a paper published by an international team of marine biologists, published in Marine Policy. The article describes how fishing […]

Mihai Andrei
September 8, 2011 @ 4:44 am

share Share

In recent years, fishing is going out of control, and deep water fishing especially has to stop, because it depleted fish stocks that take longer to recover than other species. This is exactly the conclusion of a paper published by an international team of marine biologists, published in Marine Policy.

The article describes how fishing operations in recent decades have targeted the unregulated high seas after stocks near shore were overfished. Describing the ocean as “more akin to a watery desert”, researchers argue that fishing vessels always deplete the fish and destroy deep-sea corals before moving to a newer area.

Another troubling issue is that certain species have become increasingly demanded as specialties, only to be totally destroyed by overfishing.

Elliott Norse, president of the Marine Conservation Institute and the paper’s lead author claims the world doesn’t even come close to realize how much deep water stocks take to recover.

“We’re now fishing in the worst places to fish,” Norse said in an interview. “These things don’t come back.”

Bottom-trawling can crush deep-sea corals, which can live for as long as 4,000 years, but take incredibly long to recover. Researchers also compared the situation with the mainland, where forests were mindlessly cut down in an attempt to gain more agricultural fields. But as always, money talks.

“Some of these habitats will probably be changed by fishing. Some of those corals will be gone,” Ray Hilborn, a University of Washington professor of aquatic and fisheries science said. “From a conservation perspective, maybe we shouldn’t fish at all, and the ocean should be left pristine. Where is the food going to come from?”

Daniel Pauly, a marine biologist at the University of British Columbia also points out that the costs of deep water fishing greatly outweight the benefits.

“It’s a waste of resources, it’s a waste of biodiversity, it’s a waste of everything,” Pauly said. “In the end, there is nothing left.”

Again, as always, we can only hope that the scientific world can impact the industrial world.

Via Washington Post

share Share

Parked Dark-Colored Cars Are Like Mini Heat Islands That Make City Streets Several Degrees Hotter

The color of your car may be heating your street—and your city

Beef is Driving Huge Deforestation and Emissions, But Is Regenerative Grazing a Solution?

Beef production contributes to numerous global crises, from climate change to habitat destruction to biodiversity loss.

A swarm of jellyfish just shut down 10% of France's nuclear power

On a hot August night, jellyfish jammed a nuclear giant.

A Radioactive Wasp Nest Was Just Found at an Old U.S. Nuclear Weapons Site and No One Knows What Happened

Wasp nest near nuclear waste tanks tested 10 times above safe radiation limits

This New Coating Repels Oil Like Teflon Without the Nasty PFAs

An ultra-thin coating mimics Teflon’s performance—minus most of its toxicity.

To Fight Invasive Pythons in the Everglades Scientists Turned to Robot Rabbits

Scientists are unleashing robo-rabbits to trick and trap giant invasive snakes

The AI Boom Is Thirsty for Water — And Communities Are Paying the Price

What if the future of artificial intelligence depends on your town running out of water?

What If We Built Our Skyscrapers from Wood? It's Just Crazy Enough to Work (And Good for the Planet)

Forget concrete and steel. The real future is wood.

Melting Glaciers May Unleash Hundreds of Dormant Volcanoes and Scientists Are Worried

Glacier retreat is triggering more explosive eruptions, with global consequences

Glass bottles shed up to 50 times more microplastics into drinks than plastic or cans -- and the paint on the cap may be to blame

Glass bottles may surprisingly release more plastic particles than plastic ones.