Recently, a video published on Vine by Logan Gendizzle went viral. The video claims to show what the guitar strings look like up close while the author is playing Weezer’s “Say it Ain’t So”. The result is pretty spectacular, it got tons of shares and likes… and it’s fake. The good news is that reality is even cooler.

Guitar Strings and Reality

As anyone who plays the guitar or knows the basic physics of strings could tell, guitar strings just don’t vibrate like that. Just to be extra sure, the guys at Science Alert contacted Joe Wolfe, physics and acoustics expert from UNSW Science in Sydney, Australia. According to Wolfe, what we’re seeing is “almost certainly an artefact of a moderately slow camera”. He said:

“From the two frets in view, we can see that the whole field of view of the camera is only a few centimetres in the foreground. From this and the movie, we would naively deduce that the largest amplitude waves on the strings had wavelengths of only a centimetre or so. In reality, the waves with these wavelengths will have very small amplitudes, and the large amplitude vibrations will have wavelengths of tens of centimetres,” he explains.

So why then do we see things like this? The key lies in the way the camera films the movement.

“The camera does not record all points in a picture at the same time – it scans across in lines from side to side (or sometimes top to bottom) until it has recorded a whole picture.

A more familiar example: Have you ever taken a movie from a high speed train or car window? Nearby objects like electricity posts seem to be leaning. Of course they are not, it’s just that the camera has recorded the top of the post first and, when it gets to the bottom of the post, the train has moved on. It’s more complicated when the object (like these strings) are vibrating,” Wolfe added.


Another video which illustrates a similar effect. The instruments are really out of tune though, so mute it or prepare your ears.

So there you have it – the video is misleading, sorry – the effect comes from the camera work, not from physics. But hey, I do have some good news – guitar strings really are cool when they vibrate; here’s the real deal.

How Guitar Strings Vibrate and Make Sounds


Have you ever wondered how a guitar makes sounds? We’re talking about acoustic guitar, no electrical fuzz yet. Sound is transmitted via a pressure wave within a material. When you pick the guitar string, it vibrates quickly back and forth, creating such a pressure and leaving a vaccuum behind. This alternating pressure creates sounds, which are amplified in the body of guitar and ultimately sent to your ear drums. The bigger the amplitude of the vibration, the louder the sound. The frequency can also be changed by changing the tension in the string using the tuning pegs: tighter gives higher pitch. This is what what you do when you tune up. The frequency also depends on the length of the string that is free to vibrate. You can read a more thorough explanation on Wolfe’s page.

The physics of string instruments is pretty awesome and can be quite complicated, so it’s easy to get fooled, especially when dealing with such a complex effect.

Image via Paintings I love.

 

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2015 ZME Science

Enjoyed this article? Join 40,000+ subscribers to the ZME Science newsletter. Subscribe now!

Like us on Facebook

3 Comments

  1. 1

    Saying the video is fake is just as wrong as saying the strings actually move like that.

    Rolling shutter is a common, widely-known phenomenon that occurs when something is moving at a higher rate than the camera’s refresh rate, and typically happens in well-lit environments. I’ve tossed my phone inside a friend’s acoustic guitar, taken it outside, and played a bit for the sole purpose of recording videos like this—in short, the vine is NOT fake, and you could have said that much better.

    Talk about a hypocritically misleading article….

  2. 2

    Thank you A User, you saved me a lot of typing. Seems to me the author of this piece is looking for ego stroking as he’s smarter than the rest of the world.

  3. 3

    this isnt the type of aliasing where you could find the original frequency by looking at the spectra in the frequency domain and comparing it to the sampling rate, is it?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>