The coelacanth is classed as a sarcopterygian, a term meaning fleshy fins. (c)  Chip Clark/Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, via Associated Press

The coelacanth is classed as a sarcopterygian, a term meaning fleshy fins. (c) Chip Clark/Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, via Associated Press

A matter of great debate and ardent discussion in the field of evolutionary biology today is the transition of complex life from a watery environment to land. So far, there have been numerous speculations put forward in attempt to explain how tetrapods (four-legged land animals) first evolved and washed ashore to start life fresh as land-based animals, however the missing links that mark this transition have eluded scientists.

After sequencing the DNA of a primitive fish that hasn’t evolved much in the past 400 million years and that was thought to have disappeared around the time of the dinosaur extinction, scientists lead by  Chris Amemiya, a biologist at the University of Washington in Seattle, found a gene which when inserted into mice caused them to sprout limbs. The findings might help reveal how fish ultimately swapped their fins for legs and transitioned to walking on land.

[RELATED] First four-legged land animals moved about like seals

The fish in question is called the coelacanth, and was thought to be extinct. However, in 1931 fishermen caught a living specimen, identified later as an African coelacanth, in South African shores. Later, hundreds of specimens were found around the Comoros Islands in the Indian Ocean, as well as off parts of Indonesia. What makes it extremely appealing to researchers is the fact that it has changed very little in the past 400 million years, which is why it’s considered by many as a “living fossil.”

“It really is a cornerstone from which we can view tetrapod evolution,” said study co-author Chris Amemiya, a geneticist at the Benaroya Research Institute in Seattle, Washington.

A captured coelacanth. (c) Simon Maina/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

A captured coelacanth – notice it’s fleshy fins. (c) Simon Maina/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

The gene in question is an enhancer that was present in both coelacanths and four-legged creatures, but missing in other fish, which helps in the formation of limbs in animals during the embryonic stage. The gene is not used by the coelacanth itself, since it lies in the “dark matter” side of its genome, responsible for turning genes on or off, but with no protein coding. They then inserted the coelacanth enhancer DNA into mice.

“It lit up right away and made an almost normal limb,” said Neil Shubin, meaning that the coelacanth gene enhancer successfully encouraged the mouse genes to make a limb. Dr. Shubin, a member of the team, is a paleontologist at the University of Chicago.

In addition, the researchers also found a gene related to those that, in animal species, build the placenta. Being a fish, of course the coelacanth doesn’t have a placenta, its blood-filled eggs are very large however, and hatch inside the fish.

The coelacanths aren’t the only primitive fish that might reveal secrets scientists can use to unravel tetrapod evolution. Another fish, the lungfish, is also studied by researchers, however it’s genome has 100 billion DNA units in length, compared to only 2.8 billion both the coelacanth and human genome have. As such, the lungfish’s genome can’t be decoded with present tech.

The findings were reported in an article published in the journal Nature.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2013 ZME Science

Enjoyed this article? Join 40,000+ subscribers to the ZME Science newsletter. Subscribe now!

Like us on Facebook


  1. 1

    When I was younger, I found 2 (yes, two) Ceolacanthes washed up on the beach in Port-Cartier, (Quebec) Canada. That was back around 1976. They looked identical to the ones we see in the pictures, only, not nearly as large as the one pictures above – only about half the length. They were not found together, but about one year apart, but in the same area where we used to have a house on the shore.

  2. 2
  3. 3

    no, it was ugly as hell. the first time, I went and found a stick, and poked at it… it looked like it was in decay, but on on closer inspection, I realized it was just really really ugly and everything was intact. I found another on the beach about a year later. Our home was in an area where they could get trapped as the tide receded. (in fact, there was a ship that ran aground, Lady Era – I wonder if it is still there). later on, I sw something on TV or in the papers, and understood what I had found at the time.

  4. 4

    I had no idea these were so common. And yeah, you’re right: they look scary and gross. Can’t hate on nature, though :)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>