Language Feature Unique To Human Brain Identified

chimpanzeeThere’s always been a lot of effort put into understanding what (if something) makes humans superior to other man-like mammals. The science world seems to be split into two camps, which can’t agree with each other. Now, researchers at the Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, have identified a language feature unique to the human brain which gives some insight on how human language evolved.

The study used a non-invasive technique by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI); scientists were able to compare human brain structures to those of chimpanzees, our closest living relative. Yerkes researcher James Rilling, PhD, and his colleagues studied the arcuate fasciculus which is the inner connection of the brain areas that direct the language.

According to Rillin:

“The human arcuate fasiculus differed from that of the rhesus macaques and chimpanzees in having a much larger and more widespread projection to areas in the middle temporal lobe, outside of the classical Wernicke’s area. We know from previous functional imaging studies that the middle temporal lobe is involved with analyzing the meanings of words. In humans, it seems the brain not only evolved larger language regions but also a network of fibers to connect those regions, which supports humansÕ superior language capabilities.”

“This is a landmark,” said Yerkes researcher Todd Preuss, PhD, one of the study’s coauthors. “Until DTI was developed, scientists lacked non-invasive methods to study brain connectivity directly. We couldn’t study the connections of the human brain, nor determine how humans resemble or differ from other animals. DTI now makes it possible to understand how evolution changed the wiring of the human brain to enable us to think, act and speak like humans.”

Written by



  • Rogerscottq

    Well, it would be interesting to
    know if there is a ‘commutative’
    potential involved here.

    Meaning, that maybe dumb animals have deep thoughts that
    cannot be ‘enunciated’ or ‘articulated’ because
    vocal chords and nasal cavities or what-not are ‘lagging’ behind
    ‘potential’.

    Like the data about ‘white moths’ and ‘black’ moths
    that are preserved in moth genes. But it took
    the smoke-stacks of industry to ‘favor’ the
    ‘black’ moths.

    How much energy was required to preserve this trait?

    Probably very little, but at least some.

    Yet, I’m not too sure about more extreme variability.

    Like, the lengths of a giraffes’ neck.

    If the first long-necked giraffe was an oddity, I wonder
    about the viability of that?

    One can only suppose that this odd-ball lanky-necked
    ‘weirdo’ had to have had something other than the
    work of having to bend-over to eat grass or
    short trees. Maybe the chicks were impressed
    by this weirdo or the other guys were intimidated.

    Yeah . . . . I can see how that potential would be
    preserved.

    Then those darned trees! Kept growing higher and higher
    so as to starve out the shorties . . .

    Huh! Guess I can’t fault this ‘selection’ business
    so far.

    Yet, sometimes I wonder: would a short-necked giraffe impress
    a desire for a longer neck on the sperm or ova and then
    bring-forth offspring with such better mechanics?

    I don’t know.

Tags: , ,

Subscribe for FREE!

Popular This Week

Drop us a line!

Tip us on news, scientific reports and studies, scientific advances, science art, interesting phenomena or any kind of science related material. Just write to andrei@zmescience.com.